China’s independent oil companies are ramping up operations in Iraq, investing billions of dollars in OPEC’s No. 2 producer, even as some global majors have scaled back from a market dominated by Beijing’s big state-run firms.
Drawn by more lucrative contract arrangements, smaller Chinese producers are on track to double their output in Iraq to 500,000 barrels per day by about 2030, according to estimates by executives at four of the firms, a figure not previously reported.
For Baghdad, which is also seeking to lure global giants, the growing presence of the mostly privately run Chinese players marks a shift, as Iraq comes under growing pressure to accelerate projects, multiple Iraqi energy officials said. Over the past few years, the Iraqi Ministry of Oil had pushed back on rising Chinese control over its oilfields.
For the smaller Chinese firms, managed by veterans of China’s state heavyweights, Iraq is an opportunity to leverage lower costs and faster development of projects that might be too small for Western or Chinese majors.
With meager prospects in China’s state-dominated oil and gas industry, the overseas push mirrors a pattern by Chinese firms in other heavy industries to find new markets for productive capacity and expertise.
Little-known players including Geo-Jade Petroleum Corp, United Energy Group, Zhongman Petroleum and Natural Gas Group, and Anton Oilfield Services Group made a splash last year when they won half of Iraq’s exploration licensing rounds.
Executives at smaller Chinese producers said Iraq’s investment climate has improved, as the country becomes more politically stable, and Baghdad is keen to attract Chinese and Western companies.
Iraq wants to boost output by more than half to more than 6 million barrels per day (bpd) by 2029. China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC) alone accounts for more than half of Iraq’s production at massive fields, including Haifaya, Rumaila and West Qurna 1.
Iraq’s shift a year ago to contracts based on profit-sharing from fixed-fee agreements — an attempt to accelerate projects after ExxonMobil and Shell scaled back — helped lure Chinese independents.
These smaller firms are nimbler than the big Chinese companies and more risk-tolerant than many companies that might consider investing in the Gulf economy.
Chinese companies offer competitive financing, cut costs with cheaper Chinese labor and equipment, and are willing to accept lower margins to win long-term contracts, said Ali Abdulameer at state-run Basra Oil Co, which finalizes contracts with foreign firms.
“They are known for rapid project execution, strict adherence to timelines and a high tolerance for operating in areas with security challenges,” he said. “Doing business with the Chinese is much easier and less complicated, compared to Western companies.”
Smaller Chinese firms could develop an oilfield in Iraq in two to three years, faster than the five to 10 years for Western firms, Chinese executives said.
“Chinese independents have much lower management costs compared to Western firms and are also more competitive versus Chinese state-run players,” said Dai Xiaoping (戴小平), CEO of Geo-Jade Petroleum, which has five blocks in Iraq.
The independents have driven down the industry cost to drill a development well in a major Iraqi oilfield by about half from a decade ago to between US$4 million and US$5 million, Dai said.
A Geo-Jade-led consortium agreed in May to invest in the South Basra project, which includes ramping up the Tuba field in southern Iraq to 100,000 bpd and building a 200,000-bpd refinery.
Geo-Jade, committing US$848 million, plans to revive output at the largely mothballed field to 40,000 bpd by about mid-2027, he said.
The project also calls for a petrochemical complex and two power stations, requiring a multibillion dollar investment, said Dai, a reserve engineer who previously worked overseas with CNPC and Sinopec.
Zhenhua Oil, a small state-run firm that partnered with CNPC in a US$3 billion deal to develop the Ahdab oilfield in 2008, the first major foreign-invested project after Saddam Hussein was toppled in 2003, aims to double its production to 250,000 bpd by 2030, a company official said.
Zhongman Petroleum announced in June a plan to spend US$481 million on the Middle Euphrates and East Baghdad North blocks won last year.
Chinese firms’ cheaper projects could come at the expense of Iraq’s goal to introduce more advanced technologies.
Former Basra Oil crude operations manager Muwafaq Abbas expressed concern about transparency and technical standards among Chinese firms, which he said have faced criticism for relying heavily on Chinese staff and relegating Iraqis to lower-paid roles.
To be sure, some Western firms are returning to Iraq: TotalEnergies announced a US$27 billion project in 2023, and BP is expected to spend up to US$25 billion to redevelop four Kirkuk fields, Reuters reported.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is often accused of getting close to, and even conspiring with, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). There are certainly good reasons behind these accusations, yet the confounding truth is that it makes neither historical nor logical sense for it to do so. Whether one believes that the Chinese civil war fought between the KMT and CCP in the previous century has ended or has yet to be resolved, the KMT’s retreat to Taiwan in 1949 resulted in the CCP governing China and the KMT taking root in Taiwan. For years, the KMT refused to even
RSS