Every day when we open social media, we are flooded with posts and images that are emotionally provocative, misleading and divisive. Among them are carefully crafted cognitive weapons curated for the purpose of manipulation and backed by long-standing infiltration networks from hostile foreign forces — especially the Chinese Communist party (CCP). The CCP has been systematically deploying artificial intelligence-generated content and fake accounts, as well as using information overload strategies to engage in a smoke-free cyberwar against Taiwan.
We must adopt a public health stance — treat disinformation like a virus and implement epidemic prevention strategies. Of course, though we cannot totally eliminate a virus outbreak, we could aim to reduce its transmission rate (R value) by cutting off its transference chains and building herd immunity.
The CCP’s cognitive warfare against Taiwan has three main characteristics: First, there is the mass generation of content, such as when the same message is repeatedly launched with different images, wordings and narratives. Second, repeated account duplication — once a propaganda account is exposed, another immediately takes its place. Third, cumulative strategies that merge disinformation with narrative manipulation, emotional provocation and coordinated performances by political figures, which, in turn, result in systemic offensive attacks.
These modes of dissemination mirror the organized and collective behavior of a biological virus, and are often sponsored by the CCP through allocated funding, linguistic model weaponization (an overloading of key words, phrasing and narratives that propagate the CCP’s political agenda), as well as state-affiliated content moderators.
In epidemiology, there is a key indicator termed the R value — representing how many people one infected individual can pass the virus to on average. If R > 1, the virus spreads exponentially; if R < 1, the outbreak will gradually fade, naturally dying off.
The spread of disinformation follows this pattern. Once you comment, share, or even like a post in the name of satire or criticism, algorithms automatically misinterpret the propaganda as valuable content and continue to promote it to other users. This inadvertently raises its R value, enabling it to spread faster through social networks.
The effective response is not to offer counterarguments against it, but to reduce its transmissibility: Block it, refuse engagement, and encourage others to block and report it as well. Additionally, spreading accurate information and linguistic antibodies — this is the true strategy for a cognitive epidemic prevention.
When hostile forces flood cyberspace with fake accounts, auto-generated content, and deliberately blur the line between reality and falsehood to cripple our empirical judgement, democratic societies must develop a form of digital immunity. This includes the strengthening of language and media literacy in education from a young age to cultivate cognitive antibodies; demanding transparency regarding social media algorithms and a mechanism to label content sources, thus curbing the unintentional spread of false information; forming communities that independently block, report and counter online disinformation campaigns; and urging politicians and influencers to exact self-restraint by refusing to become pawns to the CCP’s cyberwarfare.
We cannot completely eliminate disinformation, but we can prevent systemic paralysis. This requires a structured, scientific epidemic-control mindset, as well as collective action. Every time we report, block, or refrain from sharing, we become an antibody. Furthermore, every time we share correct information or infographics that neutralizes hostility, it is analogous to a vaccination — generating further immunity.
Yu Ming is a registered architect.
Translated by Lenna Veronica Suminski
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS