The US should deepen its cooperation with Taiwan on semiconductor development to counter China’s accelerating growth in the industry, the Research Institute for Democracy, Society and Emerging Technology (DSET) said in a statement on Monday in response to US President Donald Trump’s tariffs policies, including levies on semiconductors.
“Without concrete measures to address the growing challenge from China, the global industrial sector will become increasingly dependent on Chinese suppliers, which could present tremendous risks to the international democratic alliance,” DSET chief executive officer Jeremy Chang (張智程) warned.
Chang and DSET non-resident fellow Ho Ming-yen (何明彥) said that Taiwan, the US and other democratic nations fundamentally rely on stable, diversified, market-driven supply chains. China’s continued expansion in the semiconductor sector, if left unchecked, would seriously jeopardize those principles and could disrupt critical links, including those supporting the defense industry.
To counter this threat, Ho urged democracies to forge stronger partnerships in the sector by enabling free trade across the semiconductor supply chain and coordinating on production capacity as well as specialized process development. Such efforts would ensure that innovation remains in the hands of democratic nations, while building resilience against economic coercion.
President William Lai (賴清德) has also expressed Taiwan’s commitment to deepening collaboration with the US in strategic technologies. In a February meeting with then-US deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger and retired US rear admiral Mark Montgomery, Lai reaffirmed his administration’s goal of jointly constructing a secure and robust “non-red” supply chain with Washington.
“This will ensure that Taiwan, the US and democratic partners around the world maintain a technological edge,” Lai said at the time.
The remarks reflect a broader policy direction from Taiwan’s leadership that aligns with the DSET’s recommendations: building an integrated, secure and democratic tech ecosystem in partnership with the US. Yet this vision is being threatened by the tariffs that Trump’s administration is imposing.
Business Insider on April 9 reported that Trump had threatened Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) with a “big tax” of up to 100 percent if it did not build plants in the US. His remarks suggest that he understands just how essential TSMC’s chips are to the US economy. Given the strategic importance of ensuring that TSMC does not fall under China’s influence, the US should be involved in initiatives to enhance the semiconductor industry’s global resilience — especially among its democratic allies.
TSMC is a key member of the Semiconductor Industry Association. Although the association ostensibly represents US and non-US chipmakers, it is based in Washington and advocates US interests. Still, it would be shortsighted for it not to recognize that the future of the US semiconductor industry is inextricably linked with the well-being of its democratic partners in East Asia, particularly Taiwan.
A more tightly knit, cooperative network of “non-red” chipmakers would be far more capable of withstanding Chinese competition and coercion. Such a network is especially urgent, as Chinese tech firms are required to share innovations with the Chinese military, posing a serious security threat.
Taiwan should seek to engage constructively with the Trump camp and future US administrations to stress the importance of avoiding harmful tariffs and restrictions on “non-red” supply chain producers. Preserving open trade among trusted democratic partners is not merely an economic concern — it is a strategic imperative.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS