A cropped image of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) pointing to a blackboard that says: “Year-end bonus... Every resident gets NT$40,000 [US$1,337]... Taichung has a NT$12 billion surplus... Academics urge the government to return the money to the people,” has been circulating online for several days.
After the Taichung City Government reported it to the police, an investigation was launched and the public was warned that under Article 63 of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法), those who engage in “spreading rumors in a way that is sufficient to undermine public order and peace” could be detained for a maximum of three days or fined up to NT$30,000.
The term “rumor” refers to information that is fabricated or lacks factual basis.
Changhua District Court judgement No. 147 states that for a rumor to be “sufficient to undermine public order and peace,” it must cause “fear, panic or actual disturbance.” Therefore, merely spreading false content is not enough to meet that criteria.
The graphic’s use of the word “urge” implies that the measure has not been implemented. In other words, it is precisely because the city government has not yet used its surplus to distribute NT$40,000 cash handouts to residents that academics are calling on the government to do so. Where is the wrongdoing here? How is this considered “spreading rumors”?
Furthermore, the public did not experience feelings of “fear” or “panic” upon seeing the graphic — on the contrary, many expressed excitement or anticipation. Some even said: “Let all residents feel it — feel Lu’s love for the people of Taichung” and “NT$40,000 could relieve residents’ hardships.”
The graphic does not contravene the law, yet Lu reported it to the police, leading to citizens being investigated. Could this be an attempt by Lu to instill fear and restrict Taichung residents’ freedom of speech?
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung County Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS