A cropped image of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) pointing to a blackboard that says: “Year-end bonus... Every resident gets NT$40,000 [US$1,337]... Taichung has a NT$12 billion surplus... Academics urge the government to return the money to the people,” has been circulating online for several days.
After the Taichung City Government reported it to the police, an investigation was launched and the public was warned that under Article 63 of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法), those who engage in “spreading rumors in a way that is sufficient to undermine public order and peace” could be detained for a maximum of three days or fined up to NT$30,000.
The term “rumor” refers to information that is fabricated or lacks factual basis.
Changhua District Court judgement No. 147 states that for a rumor to be “sufficient to undermine public order and peace,” it must cause “fear, panic or actual disturbance.” Therefore, merely spreading false content is not enough to meet that criteria.
The graphic’s use of the word “urge” implies that the measure has not been implemented. In other words, it is precisely because the city government has not yet used its surplus to distribute NT$40,000 cash handouts to residents that academics are calling on the government to do so. Where is the wrongdoing here? How is this considered “spreading rumors”?
Furthermore, the public did not experience feelings of “fear” or “panic” upon seeing the graphic — on the contrary, many expressed excitement or anticipation. Some even said: “Let all residents feel it — feel Lu’s love for the people of Taichung” and “NT$40,000 could relieve residents’ hardships.”
The graphic does not contravene the law, yet Lu reported it to the police, leading to citizens being investigated. Could this be an attempt by Lu to instill fear and restrict Taichung residents’ freedom of speech?
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung County Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS