For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance.
It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists around the globe to resist the KMT regime’s contraventions of human rights during the White Terror era. As the Martial Law era ended and Taiwan transitioned to a democracy, it was Taiwanese who allowed KMT members to remain in the Legislative Yuan, run for office and continue to influence Taiwanese politics.
Such events are testaments to the tolerance and trust Taiwanese have given the KMT.
What has the KMT done in return?
To this day, it continues to make revanchist claims, such as asserting that “mainland China is integral to the Republic of China” and that Taiwanese are descendants of the Yan Emperor (炎帝) and Yellow Emperor (黃帝), the so-called Yanhuang shizhou (炎黃世胄). The KMT’s heart is far from the land that nurtured it and supported it, but with the long-irrelevant “motherland that birthed it.”
When Taiwanese contributed to the rescue effort after the Hualien earthquake last year, the KMT sent delegates to China for “dialogue exchanges.” When Chinese planes and warships enter the Taiwan Strait and threaten Taiwan’s safety, the KMT accuses the armed forces of provoking China through routine military exercises. When Taiwanese civilians volunteer to safeguard democracy and recall legislators who have paralyzed the political system, the KMT makes slanderous accusations based on populism and a desire for revenge.
The KMT has forgotten that Taiwan gave it a refuge to heal, a place for its children to grow up and build families in freedom, and a chance for the KMT, once a failed regime, to compete in a democratic system against other parties.
Taiwan does not judge people by their origins, but by their willingness to build a better future. Today, we must ask the KMT: Where do you consider home?
As a Taiwanese saying goes: “We are more indebted to the parents who care for us than the parents who birthed us.” It is not just an idiom; it is a measure of morality and loyalty. If the KMT continues to worship China and despise Taiwan, then Taiwan would abandon the KMT.
Taiwan does not need visitors longing for a “motherland.” Taiwan needs a family of friends who will stand with it.
Hsu Pai-yueh is a former air force fighter pilot and commercial airline pilot.
Translated by Cayce Pan
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS