For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance.
It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists around the globe to resist the KMT regime’s contraventions of human rights during the White Terror era. As the Martial Law era ended and Taiwan transitioned to a democracy, it was Taiwanese who allowed KMT members to remain in the Legislative Yuan, run for office and continue to influence Taiwanese politics.
Such events are testaments to the tolerance and trust Taiwanese have given the KMT.
What has the KMT done in return?
To this day, it continues to make revanchist claims, such as asserting that “mainland China is integral to the Republic of China” and that Taiwanese are descendants of the Yan Emperor (炎帝) and Yellow Emperor (黃帝), the so-called Yanhuang shizhou (炎黃世胄). The KMT’s heart is far from the land that nurtured it and supported it, but with the long-irrelevant “motherland that birthed it.”
When Taiwanese contributed to the rescue effort after the Hualien earthquake last year, the KMT sent delegates to China for “dialogue exchanges.” When Chinese planes and warships enter the Taiwan Strait and threaten Taiwan’s safety, the KMT accuses the armed forces of provoking China through routine military exercises. When Taiwanese civilians volunteer to safeguard democracy and recall legislators who have paralyzed the political system, the KMT makes slanderous accusations based on populism and a desire for revenge.
The KMT has forgotten that Taiwan gave it a refuge to heal, a place for its children to grow up and build families in freedom, and a chance for the KMT, once a failed regime, to compete in a democratic system against other parties.
Taiwan does not judge people by their origins, but by their willingness to build a better future. Today, we must ask the KMT: Where do you consider home?
As a Taiwanese saying goes: “We are more indebted to the parents who care for us than the parents who birthed us.” It is not just an idiom; it is a measure of morality and loyalty. If the KMT continues to worship China and despise Taiwan, then Taiwan would abandon the KMT.
Taiwan does not need visitors longing for a “motherland.” Taiwan needs a family of friends who will stand with it.
Hsu Pai-yueh is a former air force fighter pilot and commercial airline pilot.
Translated by Cayce Pan
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic