For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance.
It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists around the globe to resist the KMT regime’s contraventions of human rights during the White Terror era. As the Martial Law era ended and Taiwan transitioned to a democracy, it was Taiwanese who allowed KMT members to remain in the Legislative Yuan, run for office and continue to influence Taiwanese politics.
Such events are testaments to the tolerance and trust Taiwanese have given the KMT.
What has the KMT done in return?
To this day, it continues to make revanchist claims, such as asserting that “mainland China is integral to the Republic of China” and that Taiwanese are descendants of the Yan Emperor (炎帝) and Yellow Emperor (黃帝), the so-called Yanhuang shizhou (炎黃世胄). The KMT’s heart is far from the land that nurtured it and supported it, but with the long-irrelevant “motherland that birthed it.”
When Taiwanese contributed to the rescue effort after the Hualien earthquake last year, the KMT sent delegates to China for “dialogue exchanges.” When Chinese planes and warships enter the Taiwan Strait and threaten Taiwan’s safety, the KMT accuses the armed forces of provoking China through routine military exercises. When Taiwanese civilians volunteer to safeguard democracy and recall legislators who have paralyzed the political system, the KMT makes slanderous accusations based on populism and a desire for revenge.
The KMT has forgotten that Taiwan gave it a refuge to heal, a place for its children to grow up and build families in freedom, and a chance for the KMT, once a failed regime, to compete in a democratic system against other parties.
Taiwan does not judge people by their origins, but by their willingness to build a better future. Today, we must ask the KMT: Where do you consider home?
As a Taiwanese saying goes: “We are more indebted to the parents who care for us than the parents who birthed us.” It is not just an idiom; it is a measure of morality and loyalty. If the KMT continues to worship China and despise Taiwan, then Taiwan would abandon the KMT.
Taiwan does not need visitors longing for a “motherland.” Taiwan needs a family of friends who will stand with it.
Hsu Pai-yueh is a former air force fighter pilot and commercial airline pilot.
Translated by Cayce Pan
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS