For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance.
It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists around the globe to resist the KMT regime’s contraventions of human rights during the White Terror era. As the Martial Law era ended and Taiwan transitioned to a democracy, it was Taiwanese who allowed KMT members to remain in the Legislative Yuan, run for office and continue to influence Taiwanese politics.
Such events are testaments to the tolerance and trust Taiwanese have given the KMT.
What has the KMT done in return?
To this day, it continues to make revanchist claims, such as asserting that “mainland China is integral to the Republic of China” and that Taiwanese are descendants of the Yan Emperor (炎帝) and Yellow Emperor (黃帝), the so-called Yanhuang shizhou (炎黃世胄). The KMT’s heart is far from the land that nurtured it and supported it, but with the long-irrelevant “motherland that birthed it.”
When Taiwanese contributed to the rescue effort after the Hualien earthquake last year, the KMT sent delegates to China for “dialogue exchanges.” When Chinese planes and warships enter the Taiwan Strait and threaten Taiwan’s safety, the KMT accuses the armed forces of provoking China through routine military exercises. When Taiwanese civilians volunteer to safeguard democracy and recall legislators who have paralyzed the political system, the KMT makes slanderous accusations based on populism and a desire for revenge.
The KMT has forgotten that Taiwan gave it a refuge to heal, a place for its children to grow up and build families in freedom, and a chance for the KMT, once a failed regime, to compete in a democratic system against other parties.
Taiwan does not judge people by their origins, but by their willingness to build a better future. Today, we must ask the KMT: Where do you consider home?
As a Taiwanese saying goes: “We are more indebted to the parents who care for us than the parents who birthed us.” It is not just an idiom; it is a measure of morality and loyalty. If the KMT continues to worship China and despise Taiwan, then Taiwan would abandon the KMT.
Taiwan does not need visitors longing for a “motherland.” Taiwan needs a family of friends who will stand with it.
Hsu Pai-yueh is a former air force fighter pilot and commercial airline pilot.
Translated by Cayce Pan
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS