Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has always had a tradition of holding its leadership accountable for election defeats. Despite the LDP having already experienced three consecutive losses under the leadership of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Ishiba has insisted on staying in power to resolve the tariff negotiations with the US and Japan.
However, on Wednesday last week, US President Donald Trump unexpectedly announced that a “massive” trade deal with Japan had been reached — including a 15 percent tariff rate — thereby undermining Ishiba’s argument and making his position appear weak and ineffective.
Back in 2007, when former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s LDP lost the upper house elections and Taro Aso’s approval ratings plummeted after he succeeded Abe, Ishiba was among the first to call on both to take responsibility by stepping down.
If Ishiba insists on clinging to power despite his own abysmal track record, it would not only be difficult to justify his actions, but also harder to quell criticism from within and outside the party.
On Wednesday last week, the Mainichi Shimbun and the Yomiuri Shimbun reported that Ishiba plans to announce his resignation by the end of next month. While Ishiba swiftly denied these reports, the presence of dissent within the LDP is undeniable.
On the same day, hardline nationalist Sanae Takaichi — who led the first round of last year’s LDP leadership election — and Japanese Representative Takayuki Kobayashi each held private meetings with their supporters. Takaichi’s meeting drew attention, as it was attended by former Japanese minister of economy, trade and industry Koichi Hagiuda — a key figure in the party’s Abe faction — and was followed by a closed-door meeting with Aso. While campaigning in Japan’s ancient capital of Nara earlier this month, Takaichi declared her resolve to “stiffen the backbone of the party again,” a statement seen as signaling her intention to run for party leader once more.
The Yomiuri Shimbun named several potential successors to Ishiba, including Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Shinjiro Koizumi, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi, former LDP secretary-general Toshimitsu Motegi and former minister of digital transformation Taro Kono.
However, with the ruling coalition between the LDP and its partner Komeito lacking a majority in both houses, the combination of a strong opposition and a weak ruling party means that the next prime minister would face significant constraints in governance. As a result, the administration’s outlook remains uncertain.
For the LDP to rise from the ashes, its next leader must possess three key qualities.
The first is the ability to unify the party and engage with the opposition. Amid growing political polarization and rising conservative sentiment, the ability to unite conservative forces is crucial to the party’s survival.
Takaichi and Kobayashi visited Taiwan in April and last month respectively, demonstrating a keen awareness of security issues — positions that are quite popular among conservatives.
The second is the vision and skills nedded to revitalize Japan’s economy. In the face of weak domestic demand, inflationary pressure and the hollowing out of local industries, the next leader would struggle to maintain public support without a clear and effective plan for economic reform.
The final quality is the ability to rebuild a positive relationship with the US. Since Trump’s return to the White House, the US-Japan relationship has entered a new phase of adjustment. Takaichi, Kobayashi, Koizumi, Motegi and Hayashi all have strong ties with the US, making them better positioned than Ishiba to understand Washington’s interests and respond to new developments.
Ishiba’s slogan, “vultures do not flock together,” reflects his unconventional, independent style. However, lone-wolf figures often struggle to integrate with the broader landscape. Now, with a “post-Ishiba” era on the horizon, the leader who can emerge victorious and guide the LDP out of the fog would determine the next chapter of Japanese politics.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan, and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS