Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has always had a tradition of holding its leadership accountable for election defeats. Despite the LDP having already experienced three consecutive losses under the leadership of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Ishiba has insisted on staying in power to resolve the tariff negotiations with the US and Japan.
However, on Wednesday last week, US President Donald Trump unexpectedly announced that a “massive” trade deal with Japan had been reached — including a 15 percent tariff rate — thereby undermining Ishiba’s argument and making his position appear weak and ineffective.
Back in 2007, when former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s LDP lost the upper house elections and Taro Aso’s approval ratings plummeted after he succeeded Abe, Ishiba was among the first to call on both to take responsibility by stepping down.
If Ishiba insists on clinging to power despite his own abysmal track record, it would not only be difficult to justify his actions, but also harder to quell criticism from within and outside the party.
On Wednesday last week, the Mainichi Shimbun and the Yomiuri Shimbun reported that Ishiba plans to announce his resignation by the end of next month. While Ishiba swiftly denied these reports, the presence of dissent within the LDP is undeniable.
On the same day, hardline nationalist Sanae Takaichi — who led the first round of last year’s LDP leadership election — and Japanese Representative Takayuki Kobayashi each held private meetings with their supporters. Takaichi’s meeting drew attention, as it was attended by former Japanese minister of economy, trade and industry Koichi Hagiuda — a key figure in the party’s Abe faction — and was followed by a closed-door meeting with Aso. While campaigning in Japan’s ancient capital of Nara earlier this month, Takaichi declared her resolve to “stiffen the backbone of the party again,” a statement seen as signaling her intention to run for party leader once more.
The Yomiuri Shimbun named several potential successors to Ishiba, including Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Shinjiro Koizumi, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi, former LDP secretary-general Toshimitsu Motegi and former minister of digital transformation Taro Kono.
However, with the ruling coalition between the LDP and its partner Komeito lacking a majority in both houses, the combination of a strong opposition and a weak ruling party means that the next prime minister would face significant constraints in governance. As a result, the administration’s outlook remains uncertain.
For the LDP to rise from the ashes, its next leader must possess three key qualities.
The first is the ability to unify the party and engage with the opposition. Amid growing political polarization and rising conservative sentiment, the ability to unite conservative forces is crucial to the party’s survival.
Takaichi and Kobayashi visited Taiwan in April and last month respectively, demonstrating a keen awareness of security issues — positions that are quite popular among conservatives.
The second is the vision and skills nedded to revitalize Japan’s economy. In the face of weak domestic demand, inflationary pressure and the hollowing out of local industries, the next leader would struggle to maintain public support without a clear and effective plan for economic reform.
The final quality is the ability to rebuild a positive relationship with the US. Since Trump’s return to the White House, the US-Japan relationship has entered a new phase of adjustment. Takaichi, Kobayashi, Koizumi, Motegi and Hayashi all have strong ties with the US, making them better positioned than Ishiba to understand Washington’s interests and respond to new developments.
Ishiba’s slogan, “vultures do not flock together,” reflects his unconventional, independent style. However, lone-wolf figures often struggle to integrate with the broader landscape. Now, with a “post-Ishiba” era on the horizon, the leader who can emerge victorious and guide the LDP out of the fog would determine the next chapter of Japanese politics.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan, and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS