Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has always had a tradition of holding its leadership accountable for election defeats. Despite the LDP having already experienced three consecutive losses under the leadership of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Ishiba has insisted on staying in power to resolve the tariff negotiations with the US and Japan.
However, on Wednesday last week, US President Donald Trump unexpectedly announced that a “massive” trade deal with Japan had been reached — including a 15 percent tariff rate — thereby undermining Ishiba’s argument and making his position appear weak and ineffective.
Back in 2007, when former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s LDP lost the upper house elections and Taro Aso’s approval ratings plummeted after he succeeded Abe, Ishiba was among the first to call on both to take responsibility by stepping down.
If Ishiba insists on clinging to power despite his own abysmal track record, it would not only be difficult to justify his actions, but also harder to quell criticism from within and outside the party.
On Wednesday last week, the Mainichi Shimbun and the Yomiuri Shimbun reported that Ishiba plans to announce his resignation by the end of next month. While Ishiba swiftly denied these reports, the presence of dissent within the LDP is undeniable.
On the same day, hardline nationalist Sanae Takaichi — who led the first round of last year’s LDP leadership election — and Japanese Representative Takayuki Kobayashi each held private meetings with their supporters. Takaichi’s meeting drew attention, as it was attended by former Japanese minister of economy, trade and industry Koichi Hagiuda — a key figure in the party’s Abe faction — and was followed by a closed-door meeting with Aso. While campaigning in Japan’s ancient capital of Nara earlier this month, Takaichi declared her resolve to “stiffen the backbone of the party again,” a statement seen as signaling her intention to run for party leader once more.
The Yomiuri Shimbun named several potential successors to Ishiba, including Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Shinjiro Koizumi, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi, former LDP secretary-general Toshimitsu Motegi and former minister of digital transformation Taro Kono.
However, with the ruling coalition between the LDP and its partner Komeito lacking a majority in both houses, the combination of a strong opposition and a weak ruling party means that the next prime minister would face significant constraints in governance. As a result, the administration’s outlook remains uncertain.
For the LDP to rise from the ashes, its next leader must possess three key qualities.
The first is the ability to unify the party and engage with the opposition. Amid growing political polarization and rising conservative sentiment, the ability to unite conservative forces is crucial to the party’s survival.
Takaichi and Kobayashi visited Taiwan in April and last month respectively, demonstrating a keen awareness of security issues — positions that are quite popular among conservatives.
The second is the vision and skills nedded to revitalize Japan’s economy. In the face of weak domestic demand, inflationary pressure and the hollowing out of local industries, the next leader would struggle to maintain public support without a clear and effective plan for economic reform.
The final quality is the ability to rebuild a positive relationship with the US. Since Trump’s return to the White House, the US-Japan relationship has entered a new phase of adjustment. Takaichi, Kobayashi, Koizumi, Motegi and Hayashi all have strong ties with the US, making them better positioned than Ishiba to understand Washington’s interests and respond to new developments.
Ishiba’s slogan, “vultures do not flock together,” reflects his unconventional, independent style. However, lone-wolf figures often struggle to integrate with the broader landscape. Now, with a “post-Ishiba” era on the horizon, the leader who can emerge victorious and guide the LDP out of the fog would determine the next chapter of Japanese politics.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan, and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS