Sitting in their homes typing on their keyboards and posting on Facebook things like, “Taiwan has already lost its democracy,” “The Democratic Progressive Party is a party of green communists,” or “President William Lai [賴清德] is a dictator,” then turning around and heading to the convenience store to buy a tea egg and an iced Americano, casually chatting in a Line group about which news broadcast was more biased this morning — are such people truly clear about the kind of society in which they are living?
This is not meant to be sarcasm or criticism, but an exhausted honesty. We are witnessing an increasingly common phenomenon — a misunderstanding of freedom, a misuse of free speech and a complete misunderstanding of democracy’s fragility. Even more terrifying is that this ignorance is being cloaked in the guise of “rational skepticism,” but beneath that cloak contains a mockery of the system, a neglect of history and a sad, twisted delusion of having been persecuted.
Allow us to start from an often overlooked reality. Taiwan scored 94 points in the latest edition of Freedom House’s Freedom in the World report, while China scored a nine. You read that right — China earned a single-digit score. These rankings are not based on some abstract criteria, but are a detailed examination of several issues: Can citizens speak freely, practice their desired religion, or choose not to believe in a specific religion or ideology? Are students free from political indoctrination in schools? Is there any chance of getting a fair, unbiased trial in court? Can citizens participate in elections to alter the nation’s power structure?
China scored zero on most of these indicators.
What about Taiwan? We have political clashes in the legislature, protests in the streets, shouting matches on TV programs and political talk shows full of long-winded criticisms. Our freedom is not perfect, but it truly exists — and it was not earned easily.
When someone casually throws around the term “green communist,” do they truly comprehend the historical weight behind the word? Do they understand that in China, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can arbitrarily detain human rights lawyers, install surveillance cameras in places of worship, limit minors from entering churches and remove academic freedom clauses from university charters, thereby reducing all thoughts and ideas to a single voice — party loyalty? Do they fully grasp that in China, criticizing the CCP does not just run the risk of unemployment or silencing — but of disappearance?
If you do not understand how distant that reality is from the one we live in today, you have no one else to blame.
Taiwanese media outlets each have their own political leanings, but we can choose which ones to consume, criticize them as we please or even create our own independent outlets. The Chinese media have only one leaning. All media in China are aligned with the CCP, serve the CCP and follow its lead.
You can be dissatisfied with the Taiwanese government, but to equate a democratically elected administration with an authoritarian regime is just out of touch with reality. It is reckless, historically ignorant and most importantly, outright cruel toward those in societies who have been denied their freedom.
There are also grounds for emotional comparison. China’s economy is developing rapidly, its cities are modern and daily life is full of conveniences — so, why then, can we not we say it is free? This is one of the weakest and most harmful arguments today — reducing freedom to mere consumption and turning society into nothing but a shell for providing convenient shelter and food, all while neglecting to consider whether those living within that shell can speak the truth, question right from wrong, or participate in shaping the system. This is confusing survival for living — such freedom is not true freedom, but the price of obedience.
Taiwan’s democracy is not without issues, but it is those very issues that prove our democracy is still breathing. We can discuss, argue, oppose and be disappointed — yet we never lack the space to speak out.
This is the true face of freedom — not perfection, but the tolerance of imperfection.
Liu Che-ting is a writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times
RSS