Sitting in their homes typing on their keyboards and posting on Facebook things like, “Taiwan has already lost its democracy,” “The Democratic Progressive Party is a party of green communists,” or “President William Lai [賴清德] is a dictator,” then turning around and heading to the convenience store to buy a tea egg and an iced Americano, casually chatting in a Line group about which news broadcast was more biased this morning — are such people truly clear about the kind of society in which they are living?
This is not meant to be sarcasm or criticism, but an exhausted honesty. We are witnessing an increasingly common phenomenon — a misunderstanding of freedom, a misuse of free speech and a complete misunderstanding of democracy’s fragility. Even more terrifying is that this ignorance is being cloaked in the guise of “rational skepticism,” but beneath that cloak contains a mockery of the system, a neglect of history and a sad, twisted delusion of having been persecuted.
Allow us to start from an often overlooked reality. Taiwan scored 94 points in the latest edition of Freedom House’s Freedom in the World report, while China scored a nine. You read that right — China earned a single-digit score. These rankings are not based on some abstract criteria, but are a detailed examination of several issues: Can citizens speak freely, practice their desired religion, or choose not to believe in a specific religion or ideology? Are students free from political indoctrination in schools? Is there any chance of getting a fair, unbiased trial in court? Can citizens participate in elections to alter the nation’s power structure?
China scored zero on most of these indicators.
What about Taiwan? We have political clashes in the legislature, protests in the streets, shouting matches on TV programs and political talk shows full of long-winded criticisms. Our freedom is not perfect, but it truly exists — and it was not earned easily.
When someone casually throws around the term “green communist,” do they truly comprehend the historical weight behind the word? Do they understand that in China, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can arbitrarily detain human rights lawyers, install surveillance cameras in places of worship, limit minors from entering churches and remove academic freedom clauses from university charters, thereby reducing all thoughts and ideas to a single voice — party loyalty? Do they fully grasp that in China, criticizing the CCP does not just run the risk of unemployment or silencing — but of disappearance?
If you do not understand how distant that reality is from the one we live in today, you have no one else to blame.
Taiwanese media outlets each have their own political leanings, but we can choose which ones to consume, criticize them as we please or even create our own independent outlets. The Chinese media have only one leaning. All media in China are aligned with the CCP, serve the CCP and follow its lead.
You can be dissatisfied with the Taiwanese government, but to equate a democratically elected administration with an authoritarian regime is just out of touch with reality. It is reckless, historically ignorant and most importantly, outright cruel toward those in societies who have been denied their freedom.
There are also grounds for emotional comparison. China’s economy is developing rapidly, its cities are modern and daily life is full of conveniences — so, why then, can we not we say it is free? This is one of the weakest and most harmful arguments today — reducing freedom to mere consumption and turning society into nothing but a shell for providing convenient shelter and food, all while neglecting to consider whether those living within that shell can speak the truth, question right from wrong, or participate in shaping the system. This is confusing survival for living — such freedom is not true freedom, but the price of obedience.
Taiwan’s democracy is not without issues, but it is those very issues that prove our democracy is still breathing. We can discuss, argue, oppose and be disappointed — yet we never lack the space to speak out.
This is the true face of freedom — not perfection, but the tolerance of imperfection.
Liu Che-ting is a writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS