During World War II, Nazi Germany conducted human experiments on concentration camp prisoners — including exposure to extreme cold and high-pressure environments — all without their consent, in an effort to understand the limits of the human body.
Beginning in 1932, the Tuskegee Study was conducted on African American men in Tuskegee, Alabama, to track the natural progression of untreated syphilis. Despite the discovery of an effective treatment in 1943, the men were deliberately left untreated to continue studying the “natural course” of the disease. The unethical study was only halted in 1972.
The former were prosecuted during the Nuremberg trials, leading to the creation of the Nuremberg Code in 1947, which outlined a set of ethical principles for human experimentation. The latter led the US to pass the National Research Act, which established a system to assess and monitor research involving human subjects.
Who could have expected that, in 21st-century Taiwan, there are still research projects where principal investigators — educators at National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) — conducted long-term human experiments, not only without the consent of the subjects, but also by abusing their authority and using coercion. Even worse, the system left these students with no means of seeking help.
It has been eight months since legislators raised inquiries surrounding complaints by former members of a female soccer team at NTNU that soccer coach Chou Tai-ying (周台英) coerced them to participate in a blood sampling research project. They had to give blood samples three times per day for 14 days at a time for years, and she threatened to fail them if they did not comply.
Although the Ministry of Education has fined the university, Chou and project head Chen Chung-ching (陳忠慶) for contravening the Human Subjects Research Act (人體研究法), prosecutors say another two months are required to investigate coercion and other violations. However, the issue could be clarified simply by reviewing the original research proposal, ethics committee review documents, midterm and final reports, and audit documents, should any exist.
In a proper research project involving human subjects, research proposals are reviewed and approved by a research and ethics committee before they can proceed. In addition, the committee review is required to assess whether the benefits of the research outweigh potential harm and whether the research subjects are adequately protected.
Among these considerations, the informed consent of participants — given freely and voluntarily — is of paramount importance. Given the inherent power imbalance between lecturers and students, researchers should refrain from recruiting their own students as test subjects. Committees should only make exceptions if no alternative participants are available.
Even then, they should ensure that students complete the consent form of their own free will, and subsequent audits should be conducted to verify this.
This highlights four major issues in the NTNU case. First, the instructor contravened research ethics and their responsibilities as an educator. Second, the research and ethics committee that reviewed the project might have failed in its duties. Third, NTNU mishandled the complaints and petition process. Last, the NSTC and the ministry did not provide adequate oversight of the project.
This incident should serve as a catalyst for agencies and educational institutions to place greater emphasis on research ethics and enforce their implementation more rigorously.
Lin Jin-jia is a psychiatrist.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
There are no obvious connections between the 7-Eleven retail chain in Japan and the Philippines’ national security concerns in the South China Sea. Here is one, one that also takes in Canadian Broadcasting Corp (CBC), the government of Denmark and Taiwanese plastic surgeons on the way. Japan’s 7-Eleven on Friday last week posted on social media an image of uniforms worn by the chain store’s employees in various locations, including Taiwan, the US, Hawaii, Australia, Sweden, Denmark, Cambodia and the Philippines. If this was intended to promote a sense of camaraderie within the 7-Eleven family, it backfired. Taiwan was tagged with the
RSS