During World War II, Nazi Germany conducted human experiments on concentration camp prisoners — including exposure to extreme cold and high-pressure environments — all without their consent, in an effort to understand the limits of the human body.
Beginning in 1932, the Tuskegee Study was conducted on African American men in Tuskegee, Alabama, to track the natural progression of untreated syphilis. Despite the discovery of an effective treatment in 1943, the men were deliberately left untreated to continue studying the “natural course” of the disease. The unethical study was only halted in 1972.
The former were prosecuted during the Nuremberg trials, leading to the creation of the Nuremberg Code in 1947, which outlined a set of ethical principles for human experimentation. The latter led the US to pass the National Research Act, which established a system to assess and monitor research involving human subjects.
Who could have expected that, in 21st-century Taiwan, there are still research projects where principal investigators — educators at National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) — conducted long-term human experiments, not only without the consent of the subjects, but also by abusing their authority and using coercion. Even worse, the system left these students with no means of seeking help.
It has been eight months since legislators raised inquiries surrounding complaints by former members of a female soccer team at NTNU that soccer coach Chou Tai-ying (周台英) coerced them to participate in a blood sampling research project. They had to give blood samples three times per day for 14 days at a time for years, and she threatened to fail them if they did not comply.
Although the Ministry of Education has fined the university, Chou and project head Chen Chung-ching (陳忠慶) for contravening the Human Subjects Research Act (人體研究法), prosecutors say another two months are required to investigate coercion and other violations. However, the issue could be clarified simply by reviewing the original research proposal, ethics committee review documents, midterm and final reports, and audit documents, should any exist.
In a proper research project involving human subjects, research proposals are reviewed and approved by a research and ethics committee before they can proceed. In addition, the committee review is required to assess whether the benefits of the research outweigh potential harm and whether the research subjects are adequately protected.
Among these considerations, the informed consent of participants — given freely and voluntarily — is of paramount importance. Given the inherent power imbalance between lecturers and students, researchers should refrain from recruiting their own students as test subjects. Committees should only make exceptions if no alternative participants are available.
Even then, they should ensure that students complete the consent form of their own free will, and subsequent audits should be conducted to verify this.
This highlights four major issues in the NTNU case. First, the instructor contravened research ethics and their responsibilities as an educator. Second, the research and ethics committee that reviewed the project might have failed in its duties. Third, NTNU mishandled the complaints and petition process. Last, the NSTC and the ministry did not provide adequate oversight of the project.
This incident should serve as a catalyst for agencies and educational institutions to place greater emphasis on research ethics and enforce their implementation more rigorously.
Lin Jin-jia is a psychiatrist.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
“Of course you can choose not to be Taiwanese, just do not stay here,” chairwoman of Taipei 101 operator Taipei Financial Center Corp Janet Chia (賈永婕) said in an online interview with local entertainer Tai Chih-yuan (邰智源), triggering intense discussion on social media, with politicians across party lines weighing in. In the interview, which was aired on May 14, Chia and Tai’s discussion over a meal in Taipei 101 covered Chia’s career change from entertainer to chairwoman and US climber Alex Honnold’s free solo climb up the Taipei 101 building. During the interview, Chia said, “Being on this land, we