Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine.
“Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline.
The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead.
“Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like that.
“And if electricity prices go up, so will the cost of manufacturing and raw materials. Then, things such as soy milk, milk, egg pancakes and food will all get more expensive,” the man said.
“Spending NT$30 more each day adds up to an extra NT$10,950 per year; an extra NT$40 per day would make it NT$14,600 a year,” he added.
“So by that logic, getting this extra NT$10,000 is not worth it,” I said.
“There’s a saying in Taiwanese — ‘trading rice for sweet potatoes.’ Essentially, a bad deal,” he said. “To dodge the recall, the KMT is using taxpayers’ money to fork out NT$10,000 to all citizens. Do they take us all for fools?”
The more he spoke, the more agitated he became.
I sighed, saying that by passing the special bill to distribute the handouts, legislators had technically contravened Article 91 of the Budget Act (預算法), which requires that they first seek comment from the Executive Yuan.
“So it is fundamentally illegal,” I said. “They also didn’t explain where the money would come from. It is beyond frustrating.”
The old man concluded by saying that he was going to tell his son, who lives in Taipei, to vote “Yes” on July 26.
“Reckless legislators must be recalled,” he said.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a civil servant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS