Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine.
“Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline.
The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead.
“Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like that.
“And if electricity prices go up, so will the cost of manufacturing and raw materials. Then, things such as soy milk, milk, egg pancakes and food will all get more expensive,” the man said.
“Spending NT$30 more each day adds up to an extra NT$10,950 per year; an extra NT$40 per day would make it NT$14,600 a year,” he added.
“So by that logic, getting this extra NT$10,000 is not worth it,” I said.
“There’s a saying in Taiwanese — ‘trading rice for sweet potatoes.’ Essentially, a bad deal,” he said. “To dodge the recall, the KMT is using taxpayers’ money to fork out NT$10,000 to all citizens. Do they take us all for fools?”
The more he spoke, the more agitated he became.
I sighed, saying that by passing the special bill to distribute the handouts, legislators had technically contravened Article 91 of the Budget Act (預算法), which requires that they first seek comment from the Executive Yuan.
“So it is fundamentally illegal,” I said. “They also didn’t explain where the money would come from. It is beyond frustrating.”
The old man concluded by saying that he was going to tell his son, who lives in Taipei, to vote “Yes” on July 26.
“Reckless legislators must be recalled,” he said.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a civil servant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS