Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine.
“Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline.
The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead.
“Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like that.
“And if electricity prices go up, so will the cost of manufacturing and raw materials. Then, things such as soy milk, milk, egg pancakes and food will all get more expensive,” the man said.
“Spending NT$30 more each day adds up to an extra NT$10,950 per year; an extra NT$40 per day would make it NT$14,600 a year,” he added.
“So by that logic, getting this extra NT$10,000 is not worth it,” I said.
“There’s a saying in Taiwanese — ‘trading rice for sweet potatoes.’ Essentially, a bad deal,” he said. “To dodge the recall, the KMT is using taxpayers’ money to fork out NT$10,000 to all citizens. Do they take us all for fools?”
The more he spoke, the more agitated he became.
I sighed, saying that by passing the special bill to distribute the handouts, legislators had technically contravened Article 91 of the Budget Act (預算法), which requires that they first seek comment from the Executive Yuan.
“So it is fundamentally illegal,” I said. “They also didn’t explain where the money would come from. It is beyond frustrating.”
The old man concluded by saying that he was going to tell his son, who lives in Taipei, to vote “Yes” on July 26.
“Reckless legislators must be recalled,” he said.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a civil servant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS