The legislature has passed the third reading of the government’s special relief package, allocating NT$235 billion (US$8.02 billion) for a universal NT$10,000 cash handout, while scrapping a NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co (Taipower), which raised the package’s total ceiling from NT$410 billion to NT$545 billion.
The opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) passed its version of the bill, with the support of the Taiwan People’s Party. Together they wield a majority in the legislature.
The Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及國土安全韌性特別條例) was proposed in April to counter the impacts of US President Donald Trump’s tariffs.
The Cabinet’s proposed special budget included NT$93 billion for economic resilience, NT$150 billion for whole-of-society defense resilience and NT$167 billion for social support, which included a NT$100 billion subsidy for Taipower, as well as a NT$20 billion and NT$10 billion subsidy for national health insurance and labor insurance respectively.
The bill, which is intended to “return money to the people,” might boost the economy. It might also be unconstitutional and questionable on legal grounds for several reasons.
First, the government should make long-term plans. That the government has tax surpluses is because Taiwan’s economic performance was better than expected, which is not guaranteed every year. Apart from repaying debts, tax surpluses should be used to improve infrastructure or social welfare, so that the nation’s economic resilience can be enhanced.
A universal cash handout could jeopardize the country’s capability for national construction. Taxation is to maintain a country’s operation and improve infrastructure. Returning tax surpluses defeats that purpose. Unless there is an urgent need to rescue the economy, the cost of distributing cash would have a negative impact on the economy.
Second, a cash handout would not boost the economy. In the past, no matter whether it was the KMT or the Democratic Progressive Party in power, consumption vouchers were released along with other measures to stimulate consumption to maximize economic efficiency. The government did not simply distribute cash, which could result in consumers spending it on things that they would use their own money to buy. That would mean that the cash handout would not increase consumption.
Additionally, scrapping the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taipower would raise electricity rates and commodity prices, which would increase the burden on economically vulnerable groups.
It is clearly not worthwhile to sacrifice controlling electricity prices, a long-term benefit, for a cash handout, a short-term benefit. It would not help the economy grow and would not benefit the disadvantaged much.
Third, it is a misuse of public resources. Taxation is in itself a public good, which should be used for the benefit of the public.
A universal cash handout is not only unfair, but it was also proposed by the KMT to please voters to avoid being recalled. It is a blatant misuse of public funds to seek personal gain.
The KMT’s attempt to buy popular support through a universal cash handout amid recall elections obviously underestimates civil society in Taiwan. Using public resources to buy votes shows that KMT lawmakers disregard national interests in pursuit of personal gains. That is why mass recall campaigns are surging nationwide.
Hsu Hui-feng is a professor in CTBC Business School’s Department of Business and Economic Law.
Translated by Fion Khan
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS