The legislature has passed the third reading of the government’s special relief package, allocating NT$235 billion (US$8.02 billion) for a universal NT$10,000 cash handout, while scrapping a NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co (Taipower), which raised the package’s total ceiling from NT$410 billion to NT$545 billion.
The opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) passed its version of the bill, with the support of the Taiwan People’s Party. Together they wield a majority in the legislature.
The Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及國土安全韌性特別條例) was proposed in April to counter the impacts of US President Donald Trump’s tariffs.
The Cabinet’s proposed special budget included NT$93 billion for economic resilience, NT$150 billion for whole-of-society defense resilience and NT$167 billion for social support, which included a NT$100 billion subsidy for Taipower, as well as a NT$20 billion and NT$10 billion subsidy for national health insurance and labor insurance respectively.
The bill, which is intended to “return money to the people,” might boost the economy. It might also be unconstitutional and questionable on legal grounds for several reasons.
First, the government should make long-term plans. That the government has tax surpluses is because Taiwan’s economic performance was better than expected, which is not guaranteed every year. Apart from repaying debts, tax surpluses should be used to improve infrastructure or social welfare, so that the nation’s economic resilience can be enhanced.
A universal cash handout could jeopardize the country’s capability for national construction. Taxation is to maintain a country’s operation and improve infrastructure. Returning tax surpluses defeats that purpose. Unless there is an urgent need to rescue the economy, the cost of distributing cash would have a negative impact on the economy.
Second, a cash handout would not boost the economy. In the past, no matter whether it was the KMT or the Democratic Progressive Party in power, consumption vouchers were released along with other measures to stimulate consumption to maximize economic efficiency. The government did not simply distribute cash, which could result in consumers spending it on things that they would use their own money to buy. That would mean that the cash handout would not increase consumption.
Additionally, scrapping the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taipower would raise electricity rates and commodity prices, which would increase the burden on economically vulnerable groups.
It is clearly not worthwhile to sacrifice controlling electricity prices, a long-term benefit, for a cash handout, a short-term benefit. It would not help the economy grow and would not benefit the disadvantaged much.
Third, it is a misuse of public resources. Taxation is in itself a public good, which should be used for the benefit of the public.
A universal cash handout is not only unfair, but it was also proposed by the KMT to please voters to avoid being recalled. It is a blatant misuse of public funds to seek personal gain.
The KMT’s attempt to buy popular support through a universal cash handout amid recall elections obviously underestimates civil society in Taiwan. Using public resources to buy votes shows that KMT lawmakers disregard national interests in pursuit of personal gains. That is why mass recall campaigns are surging nationwide.
Hsu Hui-feng is a professor in CTBC Business School’s Department of Business and Economic Law.
Translated by Fion Khan
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials