In Taiwan, the implementation of the Constitution was overshadowed by the bloodshed of the 228 Incident. The Republic of China (ROC) Constitution was promulgated on Dec. 25, 1946, just two months before the outbreak of the incident in early 1947. The proximity of these events raises an unsettling question: Was there a deeper connection between them?
In 1946, before the incident, Taiwanese could not have foreseen that just three years later, in 1949, the nation would enter a period governed by the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款), which effectively suspended the Constitution. Under these emergency provisions, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) declared nationwide martial law in May 1949, thereby putting the Constitution on hold.
In 1946, Taiwanese still believed that the ratification of the Constitution offered a pathway out of dictatorship, initiating a system of suffrage to dismantle a corrupt authoritarian regime through democratic elections and institutional reform.
That year, 18 Taiwanese delegates to the National Assembly for the Establishment of the Constitution took the initiative to voice their concerns during the National Assembly convened in Nanjing, urging the full implementation of the Constitution without delay.
The history of implementing the Constitution is recorded in a letter from Lin Lien-tsung (林連宗), one of those Taiwanese delegates, addressed to his daughter Lin Hsin-yu (林信貞). He wrote: “After the Constitution was passed, no date had been set for its implementation. In response, we Taiwanese delegates demanded that the Constitution be implemented in Taiwan immediately. To make every delegate from other provinces in China understand our situation, we invited members of the national press and fellow delegates to repeatedly explain our position.”
Lin Lien-tsung’s letter was not merely a personal account — it reflected real political action. His advocacy was formalized into an official proposal, documented in black and white as Proposal No. 61 in the Record of the National Assembly (國民大會實錄).
In Proposal No. 61, 11 Taiwanese delegates, including Lin Lien-tsung, Chang Chi-lang (張七郎) and Huang Kuo-shu (黃國書) — but not Lien Chen-tung (連震東), Lee Wan-chu (李萬居) and Liu Ming-chao (劉明朝), as they did not participate in the proposal — joined forces with other delegates from other provinces. In total 71 delegates submitted a unified proposal for the restoration of suffrage rights to ROC citizens. The proposal demanded that the government promulgate the Constitution within 10 days and implement it within six months.
The advocacy for constitutional democracy sent shockwaves through Taiwanese society. Members of the former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — revived as the Taiwan Provincial Political Construction Association after World War II, and not to be confused with the current Taiwan People’s Party founded by then-Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) in 2019 — took to the streets waving banners in support of holding general elections, and calling for democratically elected county commissioners and mayors.
The TPP had been co-founded in 1927 by Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) and others, but was dissolved by the Japanese colonial government in 1931. In January 1946, former members and activists regrouped and established the Taiwan People’s Association, which was soon forced to rename, and became the Taiwan Provincial Political Construction Association that March. The association requested universal suffrage as early as in June 1947.
Meanwhile, the ROC government postponed the implementation of the Constitution, later announcing that it would be enacted on Dec. 25, 1947. Then-Taiwanese chief executive Chen Yi (陳儀) further obstructed Taiwan’s path to democracy by introducing a three-year local government political plan. Yet in the face of growing resistance, protesters pressed forward, resorting to any means available to push for democratic reforms and transform Taiwan into a “model province,” where democratic elections would be held as soon as possible.
The opposition leaders played a vital role in spearheading Taiwan’s early pro-democracy protest movement. They recognized that the mass movement leading to the 228 Incident represented the largest civil uprising in Taiwan’s history up to that point — one that compelled the ruling authorities to confront the public’s demand for universal suffrage.
At the heart of this democratic struggle stood the Constitution — which served as the most powerful legal foundation for the opposition’s calls for political reform and universal suffrage.
On March 7, 1947, amid mounting pressure from the protest movement, Chen announced that July 1 would be election day for county and city heads. However, the brief concession was followed by the brutal crackdown of the 228 Incident, as Chiang Kai-shek ordered military forces into Taiwan.
Opposition figures — many affiliated with the Taiwan Provincial Political Construction Association — were systematically targeted and assassinated. Lin Lien-tsung and Chang were among those killed; Lin’s body was never found. Chang’s sons, Chang Chung-jan (張宗仁) and Chang Kuo-jan (張果仁), both medical doctors, were arrested and executed by firing squad alongside their father.
President William Lai (賴清德) has demonstrated a willingness to engage with Taiwan’s history. As he continues to articulate his vision, it is hoped that Lai would come to fully recognize the sacrifices and bloodshed of those who fought for democracy. Only through such historical awareness can the Constitution be reaffirmed as the enduring cornerstone of national unity.
Huang Heui-jiun is the author of A Vanished Political Party in the 228 Incident.
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS