In Taiwan, the implementation of the Constitution was overshadowed by the bloodshed of the 228 Incident. The Republic of China (ROC) Constitution was promulgated on Dec. 25, 1946, just two months before the outbreak of the incident in early 1947. The proximity of these events raises an unsettling question: Was there a deeper connection between them?
In 1946, before the incident, Taiwanese could not have foreseen that just three years later, in 1949, the nation would enter a period governed by the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款), which effectively suspended the Constitution. Under these emergency provisions, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) declared nationwide martial law in May 1949, thereby putting the Constitution on hold.
In 1946, Taiwanese still believed that the ratification of the Constitution offered a pathway out of dictatorship, initiating a system of suffrage to dismantle a corrupt authoritarian regime through democratic elections and institutional reform.
That year, 18 Taiwanese delegates to the National Assembly for the Establishment of the Constitution took the initiative to voice their concerns during the National Assembly convened in Nanjing, urging the full implementation of the Constitution without delay.
The history of implementing the Constitution is recorded in a letter from Lin Lien-tsung (林連宗), one of those Taiwanese delegates, addressed to his daughter Lin Hsin-yu (林信貞). He wrote: “After the Constitution was passed, no date had been set for its implementation. In response, we Taiwanese delegates demanded that the Constitution be implemented in Taiwan immediately. To make every delegate from other provinces in China understand our situation, we invited members of the national press and fellow delegates to repeatedly explain our position.”
Lin Lien-tsung’s letter was not merely a personal account — it reflected real political action. His advocacy was formalized into an official proposal, documented in black and white as Proposal No. 61 in the Record of the National Assembly (國民大會實錄).
In Proposal No. 61, 11 Taiwanese delegates, including Lin Lien-tsung, Chang Chi-lang (張七郎) and Huang Kuo-shu (黃國書) — but not Lien Chen-tung (連震東), Lee Wan-chu (李萬居) and Liu Ming-chao (劉明朝), as they did not participate in the proposal — joined forces with other delegates from other provinces. In total 71 delegates submitted a unified proposal for the restoration of suffrage rights to ROC citizens. The proposal demanded that the government promulgate the Constitution within 10 days and implement it within six months.
The advocacy for constitutional democracy sent shockwaves through Taiwanese society. Members of the former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — revived as the Taiwan Provincial Political Construction Association after World War II, and not to be confused with the current Taiwan People’s Party founded by then-Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) in 2019 — took to the streets waving banners in support of holding general elections, and calling for democratically elected county commissioners and mayors.
The TPP had been co-founded in 1927 by Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) and others, but was dissolved by the Japanese colonial government in 1931. In January 1946, former members and activists regrouped and established the Taiwan People’s Association, which was soon forced to rename, and became the Taiwan Provincial Political Construction Association that March. The association requested universal suffrage as early as in June 1947.
Meanwhile, the ROC government postponed the implementation of the Constitution, later announcing that it would be enacted on Dec. 25, 1947. Then-Taiwanese chief executive Chen Yi (陳儀) further obstructed Taiwan’s path to democracy by introducing a three-year local government political plan. Yet in the face of growing resistance, protesters pressed forward, resorting to any means available to push for democratic reforms and transform Taiwan into a “model province,” where democratic elections would be held as soon as possible.
The opposition leaders played a vital role in spearheading Taiwan’s early pro-democracy protest movement. They recognized that the mass movement leading to the 228 Incident represented the largest civil uprising in Taiwan’s history up to that point — one that compelled the ruling authorities to confront the public’s demand for universal suffrage.
At the heart of this democratic struggle stood the Constitution — which served as the most powerful legal foundation for the opposition’s calls for political reform and universal suffrage.
On March 7, 1947, amid mounting pressure from the protest movement, Chen announced that July 1 would be election day for county and city heads. However, the brief concession was followed by the brutal crackdown of the 228 Incident, as Chiang Kai-shek ordered military forces into Taiwan.
Opposition figures — many affiliated with the Taiwan Provincial Political Construction Association — were systematically targeted and assassinated. Lin Lien-tsung and Chang were among those killed; Lin’s body was never found. Chang’s sons, Chang Chung-jan (張宗仁) and Chang Kuo-jan (張果仁), both medical doctors, were arrested and executed by firing squad alongside their father.
President William Lai (賴清德) has demonstrated a willingness to engage with Taiwan’s history. As he continues to articulate his vision, it is hoped that Lai would come to fully recognize the sacrifices and bloodshed of those who fought for democracy. Only through such historical awareness can the Constitution be reaffirmed as the enduring cornerstone of national unity.
Huang Heui-jiun is the author of A Vanished Political Party in the 228 Incident.
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS