Building a new US political party from scratch is a daunting task, even for the world’s richest man. However, that is what Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said he plans to do in the wake of his falling out with US President Donald Trump. Musk on Saturday last week announced the birth of the “America Party” — which he said was dedicated to defeating Republicans who backed Trump’s massive tax-cut and spending bill.
Musk described his new party on his platform X as tech-centric, budget-conscious, pro-energy and centrist, with the goal of drawing disaffected Democrats and Republicans. Musk has criticized the tax-cut bill, which is forecast to add about US$3.4 trillion to the US’ debt.
Breaking the two-party system’s grip on US federal elections would take tremendous resources and a long-term commitment, political experts said. Similar attempts have failed, underscoring how difficult it is to gain a foothold in a country where elections are organized on a state-by-state level.
“There are just very, very significant barriers to the creation of a viable third party,” Boston College political science professor David Hopkins said.
Challenges include building party infrastructure, organizing volunteers and qualifying for the ballot, he said.
David Jolly, a former Republican representative from Florida who left the party over Trump, said Musk can provide what has long been required for such a push: money.
“What the independent space has been lacking has been resources,” Jolly said. “It’s more than filing with the Federal Election Commission. It’s really starting 50 state parties. You’re talking about US$100 million just to enter the space with real serious intent.”
Jolly said he considered returning to politics as an independent, but concluded that staying within the two-party system would be a more effective way to reach unhappy voters. He is now running for governor of Florida as a Democrat.
In 2016, former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, another billionaire, made a similar conclusion, rejecting the idea of running for president as an independent, saying that such a candidate would have “no chance of winning.” Jolly estimated it would take Musk 10 years and perhaps US$1 billion to build a viable national party — and said Musk’s recent history with the US Department of Government Efficiency suggests the billionaire might not be in it for the long haul. Musk left the department after just a few months in Trump’s administration, having delivered little of the savings he promised.
“What we have seen is an Elon Musk who is not disciplined ... enough to change American politics,” Jolly said.
Musk’s office did not respond to a request for comment.
Tesla shares closed nearly 7 percent lower on Monday, as Musk reignited investors’ worries about his focus on the company.
Musk could have chosen a more traditional path, using his political action committee to back Republican challengers to incumbents in the party primaries ahead of next year’s midterm elections, which would determine control of the US Congress. He was the largest donor in last year’s campaign cycle, making nearly US$300 million in contributions, mostly focused on helping Trump return to the White House. Not all his political efforts have paid off. He poured millions of dollars into a Wisconsin Supreme Court election in April, only to see his preferred candidate fail. His efforts to convince Republicans in the US Congress not to pass Trump’s tax bill also fell flat.
It is unclear how effective he would be in backing independents in a handful of competitive US House of Representatives races.
As it is, the roughly three-dozen races deemed competitive by nonpartisan analysts are often already swamped with cash from political parties and outside fundraisers, and the candidates themselves typically are ideologically more moderate — which would make it harder for Musk’s candidates to differentiate themselves.
Historically, congressional candidates outside the two parties have struggled to overcome disadvantages in local efforts to organize and get out the vote. More often, independents have served as spoilers — siphoning away votes from either the Democrat or Republican.
In last year’s election for a House seat in Ohio, independent candidate Dennis Kucinich, a former Democratic representative, captured more than 12 percent of the general election vote. The Republican, Max Miller, won by 15 percentage points.
Trump mocked Musk’s efforts on Sunday.
“Third parties have never worked, so he can have fun with it, but I think it’s ridiculous,” he told reporters.
Complicating Musk’s plans is that many voters dislike him. Any role he plays in an election is sure to become part of the debate.
Musk is viewed less favorably than Trump by the US public at large — just 36 percent of respondents to a June Reuters/Ipsos poll had a favorable view of Musk compared with 42 percent who viewed Trump favorably, while 59 percent of respondents have an unfavorable view of him compared with 55 percent who viewed Trump unfavorably.
His biggest liability might be that he is trying to challenge Trump politically while relying on support from Trump’s own voters. Musk enjoyed his strongest level of support — 78 percent favorability — among people who voted for Trump in November last year.
“Musk himself is not very popular, and his appeal has a huge overlap with the existing Republican coalition,” Georgetown University political scientist Hans Noel said. “There really isn’t an unrepresented movement that he’s speaking for ... he’s unlikely to elect many America Party candidates.”
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Workers’ rights groups on July 17 called on the Ministry of Labor to protect migrant fishers, days after CNN reported what it described as a “pattern of abuse” in Taiwan’s distant-water fishing industry. The report detailed the harrowing account of Indonesian migrant fisher Silwanus Tangkotta, who crushed his fingers in a metal door last year while aboard a Taiwanese fishing vessel. The captain reportedly refused to return to port for medical treatment, as they “hadn’t caught enough fish to justify the trip.” Tangkotta lost two fingers, and was fired and denied compensation upon returning to land. Another former migrant fisher, Adrian Dogdodo
RSS