The Ministry of Agriculture has estimated that agricultural losses caused by Typhoon Danas totaled NT$1.6 billion (US$54.72 million). During the last legislative session, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators jointly cut the ministry’s budget for this year’s agricultural special income fund by NT$90 million, which would inevitably impact the government’s distribution of agricultural disaster relief funds.
Additionally, disaster relief funds, which fall under the agricultural special income fund, have in recent years consistently faced budget shortfalls due to frequent natural disasters. As a result, the ministry has had to apply for permission from the Executive Yuan to access allocations from the secondary reserve fund.
However, Article 22 of the Budget Act (預算法) states: “No reserve funds shall be used for any budget items deleted or budget amount cut down by the Legislative Yuan at the review unless used for Allocations for Legal Expenses or otherwise agreed upon by the Legislative Yuan.”
Therefore, if disaster relief funds were to run empty, it would be impossible to employ the secondary reserve fund to fill in budgetary gaps, which would lead to significant delays in relief fund disbursement. This raises the question — should farmers seek compensation from KMT and TPP legislators for the losses they suffer as a result of these budget cuts?
The agriculture ministry had proposed a budget of NT$169.2 billion for this year, but the Legislative Yuan cut NT$2 billion to eliminate the budget for items such as marketing and publicity, domestic and international travel expenses, and public budgets for supplementary funds.
Article 6 of the Agricultural Natural Disaster Relief Regulations (農業天然災害救助辦法) stipulates that — within seven days following a natural disaster — local agricultural authorities may consult with the Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute to assist with conducting damage assessments.
Similarly, the operational guidelines for agricultural natural disaster relief require that random inspections be conducted by small teams composed of personnel from the Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute and the Agriculture and Food Agency. With the travel budgets for these departments having been cut this year, how would on-site damage assessments be carried out? Are civil servants expected to pay for their own travel expenses?
KMT and TPP legislators arbitrarily slashed the budget, directly cutting disaster relief funds that provide the subsidies farmers urgently need. As a result, it would be impossible for farmers affected by natural disasters to resume work as soon as possible to sustain their livelihoods. KMT and TPP legislators have not only failed their constituents, but also brought shame to the office of legislators.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung County Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS