The documentary A Chip Odyssey (造山者-世紀的賭注) portrays the immense hardships involved in building Taiwan’s semiconductor industry into what is known as the “silicon shield.” Today, Taiwan has forged another form of shield to protect the country — the mass recall movement, driven by civic groups and volunteers. This movement embodies the core value of public accountability, sending a clear message: Resist the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), safeguard Taiwan, raise civil awareness.
The first wave that primed Taiwan’s civic self-defense was the “Bluebird movement,” which emerged in response to a series of power-grabbing amendments pushed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) last year. Since then, the KMT has shown an insatiable appetite for control — drafting a national security strategy act to reduce the president’s authority to a mere figurehead; revising the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) to tighten regulations on signature campaigns; shelving 10 national security-related bills; improperly amending the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法); and rashly reviewing, freezing and slashing the annual budget.
Moreover, KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) promoted these controversial initiatives after leading a delegation to China, reinforcing perceptions of the KMT as undermining Taiwanese sovereignty. The collective consciousness “Resist the CCP, safeguard Taiwan, raise civil awareness” has spread like wildfire, amplifying civic awareness and strengthening the public’s sense of self-defense. These developments have driven the mass recall movement, which targets at least 24 KMT lawmakers in the third stage of the mass recall vote.
This wave of civic self-defense among Taiwanese civil groups is embodied in the recall movement. Not only does the recall hold individual lawmakers accountable, but it also symbolizes the rise of civic awareness. First, the recall movement serves as a defense of Taiwan’s constitutional system and national security, demonstrating the nation’s commitment to democracy amid mounting economic and social challenges. Second, the movement reinforces the collective consensus around “Resist the CCP, safeguard Taiwan, raise civil awareness.” Taiwanese are making a firm stand of resistance in the face of escalating economic and military pressure from China. Third, the movement has accelerated political participation among the younger generation and strengthened networks of civil groups and online platforms, transforming grassroots power as a force for political change. This forms a dynamic chain that resembles Taiwan’s semiconductor supply chain, with each part pulsing, passing and perpetuating the power to the next.
On the international stage, China’s “wolf warrior” diplomacy and geopolitical expansionism have heightened global awareness. Taiwan, as a key provider in the global semiconductor supply chain, enjoys a growing international consensus that the world cannot afford to see it fall under China’s control. Alliances among the US, Japan, Australia and other partners have formed what some now describe as a “new Eight-Nation Alliance” — to repurpose the name originally given to the Western powers that plagued the Qing Dynasty in its final years — to support Taiwan and to ensure the safety of the Taiwan Strait. This alliance consists of lawmakers across democratic countries, united in their criticism of China as a regime ruled by the CCP and in their shared commitment to resisting authoritarian expansion.
As tensions rise, Taiwan has become a vital pillar of global security. However, the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party have taken several controversial actions that could be seen as destabilizing, undermining the confidence of international allies in Taiwan. The mass recall movement has demonstrated to the world that Taiwan’s civil society has the resilience to self-correct within a democracy, safeguarding national security and governance efficacy, under the idea of “Resist the CCP, safeguard Taiwan, raise civil awareness.”
The mass recall movement is not only a reckoning for unscrupulous lawmakers, but also a powerful statement from Taiwan’s civil society. This is a new chapter in Taiwan’s democratic odyssey, where civic power is forged to build a resilient democratic foundation. The mass recall movement and Taiwan’s world-leading semiconductor industry can be seen as titans of the nation’s future. While semiconductors serve as the economic lifeblood of the nation, civic awareness rises as a guard for the democratic soul, together reshaping the destiny of Taiwan.
Chang Yeh-sen is a doctor and the chairman of the Taiwan Society.
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did