The documentary A Chip Odyssey (造山者-世紀的賭注) portrays the immense hardships involved in building Taiwan’s semiconductor industry into what is known as the “silicon shield.” Today, Taiwan has forged another form of shield to protect the country — the mass recall movement, driven by civic groups and volunteers. This movement embodies the core value of public accountability, sending a clear message: Resist the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), safeguard Taiwan, raise civil awareness.
The first wave that primed Taiwan’s civic self-defense was the “Bluebird movement,” which emerged in response to a series of power-grabbing amendments pushed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) last year. Since then, the KMT has shown an insatiable appetite for control — drafting a national security strategy act to reduce the president’s authority to a mere figurehead; revising the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) to tighten regulations on signature campaigns; shelving 10 national security-related bills; improperly amending the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法); and rashly reviewing, freezing and slashing the annual budget.
Moreover, KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) promoted these controversial initiatives after leading a delegation to China, reinforcing perceptions of the KMT as undermining Taiwanese sovereignty. The collective consciousness “Resist the CCP, safeguard Taiwan, raise civil awareness” has spread like wildfire, amplifying civic awareness and strengthening the public’s sense of self-defense. These developments have driven the mass recall movement, which targets at least 24 KMT lawmakers in the third stage of the mass recall vote.
This wave of civic self-defense among Taiwanese civil groups is embodied in the recall movement. Not only does the recall hold individual lawmakers accountable, but it also symbolizes the rise of civic awareness. First, the recall movement serves as a defense of Taiwan’s constitutional system and national security, demonstrating the nation’s commitment to democracy amid mounting economic and social challenges. Second, the movement reinforces the collective consensus around “Resist the CCP, safeguard Taiwan, raise civil awareness.” Taiwanese are making a firm stand of resistance in the face of escalating economic and military pressure from China. Third, the movement has accelerated political participation among the younger generation and strengthened networks of civil groups and online platforms, transforming grassroots power as a force for political change. This forms a dynamic chain that resembles Taiwan’s semiconductor supply chain, with each part pulsing, passing and perpetuating the power to the next.
On the international stage, China’s “wolf warrior” diplomacy and geopolitical expansionism have heightened global awareness. Taiwan, as a key provider in the global semiconductor supply chain, enjoys a growing international consensus that the world cannot afford to see it fall under China’s control. Alliances among the US, Japan, Australia and other partners have formed what some now describe as a “new Eight-Nation Alliance” — to repurpose the name originally given to the Western powers that plagued the Qing Dynasty in its final years — to support Taiwan and to ensure the safety of the Taiwan Strait. This alliance consists of lawmakers across democratic countries, united in their criticism of China as a regime ruled by the CCP and in their shared commitment to resisting authoritarian expansion.
As tensions rise, Taiwan has become a vital pillar of global security. However, the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party have taken several controversial actions that could be seen as destabilizing, undermining the confidence of international allies in Taiwan. The mass recall movement has demonstrated to the world that Taiwan’s civil society has the resilience to self-correct within a democracy, safeguarding national security and governance efficacy, under the idea of “Resist the CCP, safeguard Taiwan, raise civil awareness.”
The mass recall movement is not only a reckoning for unscrupulous lawmakers, but also a powerful statement from Taiwan’s civil society. This is a new chapter in Taiwan’s democratic odyssey, where civic power is forged to build a resilient democratic foundation. The mass recall movement and Taiwan’s world-leading semiconductor industry can be seen as titans of the nation’s future. While semiconductors serve as the economic lifeblood of the nation, civic awareness rises as a guard for the democratic soul, together reshaping the destiny of Taiwan.
Chang Yeh-sen is a doctor and the chairman of the Taiwan Society.
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS