Today is the 90th birthday of His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama. In an age marred by authoritarian resurgence, geopolitical fragmentation and ethical ambiguity, the Dalai Lama’s voice continues to resonate with uncommon moral clarity.
For decades, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has sought to control Tibetan Buddhism from the inside out. In 2007, Beijing codified its claim to religious authority by requiring all reincarnated lamas to be approved by the state. The absurdity of an atheist regime appointing spiritual leaders is not lost on the world. Nor is the precedent: In 1995, after the Dalai Lama recognized a six-year-old boy as the 11th Panchen Lama, China abducted the child and installed its own proxy. That boy — Gedhun Choekyi Nyima — has not been seen since.
Now, the 14th Dalai Lama has made it unequivocally clear: His own reincarnation would be chosen by the Gaden Phodrang Trust, in accordance with centuries-old Tibetan Buddhist tradition. He has further stated that his successor would be born in a free country — not under Chinese rule. This announcement has sparked a wave of international affirmation.
The US, through its Tibetan Policy and Support Act, has explicitly rejected China’s claim to control reincarnation and authorized sanctions against officials who interfere. Amnesty International has called China’s policy a “direct assault” on religious freedom. Buddhist communities across Asia have echoed the Dalai Lama’s call for spiritual autonomy.
At its core, this is a battle between coercion and conscience. China’s reincarnation policy is not about religion; it is about control. It seeks to manufacture legitimacy by co-opting the symbols of Tibetan identity. However, the world has seen this playbook before — in Hong Kong, in Xinjiang and in the silencing of dissent across China. The Dalai Lama’s stand is a reminder that some truths cannot be legislated away.
Moreover, the global embrace of his announcement reflects a deeper recognition: That Tibet’s struggle is not a relic of the past, but a living testament to the resilience of culture, faith and freedom. The Dalai Lama is not just a spiritual leader — he is a symbol of nonviolent resistance, of compassion in the face of conquest. His decision to continue the lineage is not about personal legacy; it is about ensuring that the Tibetan people — and their spiritual compass — are not erased.
Legitimacy cannot be forged in the halls of Beijing. It must be earned in the hearts of the faithful. In that realm, the Dalai Lama’s voice still echoes with unmatched clarity.
Let this 90th birthday renew our commitment — not just to His Holiness’ legacy, but to the future of a free and culturally vibrant Tibet. The measure of our admiration must be action. Anything less would dishonor the path he has walked on behalf of all of us.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS