Today is the 90th birthday of His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama. In an age marred by authoritarian resurgence, geopolitical fragmentation and ethical ambiguity, the Dalai Lama’s voice continues to resonate with uncommon moral clarity.
For decades, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has sought to control Tibetan Buddhism from the inside out. In 2007, Beijing codified its claim to religious authority by requiring all reincarnated lamas to be approved by the state. The absurdity of an atheist regime appointing spiritual leaders is not lost on the world. Nor is the precedent: In 1995, after the Dalai Lama recognized a six-year-old boy as the 11th Panchen Lama, China abducted the child and installed its own proxy. That boy — Gedhun Choekyi Nyima — has not been seen since.
Now, the 14th Dalai Lama has made it unequivocally clear: His own reincarnation would be chosen by the Gaden Phodrang Trust, in accordance with centuries-old Tibetan Buddhist tradition. He has further stated that his successor would be born in a free country — not under Chinese rule. This announcement has sparked a wave of international affirmation.
The US, through its Tibetan Policy and Support Act, has explicitly rejected China’s claim to control reincarnation and authorized sanctions against officials who interfere. Amnesty International has called China’s policy a “direct assault” on religious freedom. Buddhist communities across Asia have echoed the Dalai Lama’s call for spiritual autonomy.
At its core, this is a battle between coercion and conscience. China’s reincarnation policy is not about religion; it is about control. It seeks to manufacture legitimacy by co-opting the symbols of Tibetan identity. However, the world has seen this playbook before — in Hong Kong, in Xinjiang and in the silencing of dissent across China. The Dalai Lama’s stand is a reminder that some truths cannot be legislated away.
Moreover, the global embrace of his announcement reflects a deeper recognition: That Tibet’s struggle is not a relic of the past, but a living testament to the resilience of culture, faith and freedom. The Dalai Lama is not just a spiritual leader — he is a symbol of nonviolent resistance, of compassion in the face of conquest. His decision to continue the lineage is not about personal legacy; it is about ensuring that the Tibetan people — and their spiritual compass — are not erased.
Legitimacy cannot be forged in the halls of Beijing. It must be earned in the hearts of the faithful. In that realm, the Dalai Lama’s voice still echoes with unmatched clarity.
Let this 90th birthday renew our commitment — not just to His Holiness’ legacy, but to the future of a free and culturally vibrant Tibet. The measure of our admiration must be action. Anything less would dishonor the path he has walked on behalf of all of us.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS