It was encouraging to hear about the establishment of a preparatory office for the National Indigenous Peoples’ Museum, which is to be constructed north of Kaohsiung’s Chengcing Lake (澄清湖). The office’s establishment has attracted a lot of public attention surrounding the museum’s design and development. However, a museum is more than a static exhibition space — it should also serve as a home for collective memories, a platform of cultural exchange and a crucial foundation for indigenous groups as they look forward to the future.
For a museum to truly belong to indigenous people, it should tell cultural stories with its architectural design. Its exterior should incorporate elements of traditional indigenous dwellings, along with images of mountains and oceans or ancestral totems, allowing visitors to feel the spirit of indigenous groups upon approaching. Entering the museum should feel like a journey through daily village life — from oral histories passed down by elders to hunting rituals and traditional arts — allowing the culture to naturally flow between visitors’ every step.
In our digital age, a museum for indigenous people should also make good use of technology. Through the use of augmented reality, virtual reality and interactive projections, young visitors could do more than just view the exhibitions — they could participate in traditional harvest festivals or step onto tribal hunting grounds. Technology is not merely a supportive or supplementary tool for exhibitions — it is key to the rebirth of cultural acceptance and understanding.
That being said, the core focus of a museum should never be the objects on display, but the people. In the past, many stories about indigenous people were told by outsiders, leading to the oversimplification and distortion of indigenous cultures. Future museums must allow indigenous people to tell their own stories. From design and curation to guided tours, indigenous people must take center stage. Only then can a museum truly become a source of pride and a home for indigenous communities.
More importantly, a museum should not merely be a place for exhibitions — it should reach into communities and connect with local life. Through tribal tours, handmade craft workshops and even integration with indigenous cultural tourism, more people can engage with indigenous cultures firsthand, thereby creating more opportunities for local communities to grow and thrive.
Shifting focus to the international stage, Taiwan’s indigenous groups are a vital part of the global Austronesian language family. Indigenous people’s museums can also serve as a window to cultural diplomacy. By organizing international exhibitions, curatorial collaborations and digital collections, Taiwan can make its voice heard on the Austronesian cultural map and share its own story with the world.
Yu Tien-min is an assistant professor at Da-Yeh University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS