The Japanese-language daily Nikkei published a two-part column describing Japan and democratic countries in Europe as “tacitly accepting” Israel’s and the US’ use of military force against Iran, profoundly reflecting on the two countries’ attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities and the reactions of Western nations.
European countries — which have consistently emphasized international law and multilateralism, but now choose to keep a low profile and silent by not condemning the attacks — are apparently not determined enough to uphold the principle of resolving conflicts peacefully.
Japan, which relies on the Middle East for its energy needs and is constrained by its security alliance with the US, finds itself in an uncomfortable position. The East Asian nation is not only ambiguous in its diplomatic policies, but is also demonstrating a lack of strategy.
The US, as a leader of the democratic bloc, did not just tacitly approve Israel’s military actions, but also directly took part in the conflict.
Since US President Donald Trump’s first administration withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, in 2018, the US has adopted a tough stance on Tehran. Watching the US strike Iran soon after Trump’s return to the White House, belligerent China probably has mixed feelings.
The US is no longer playing the role of an arbitrator of the international order, but is instead overtly demonstrating its power.
As “might makes right” increasingly becomes a policy, the international order of the free world is undergoing a significant reshuffle.
The authoritarian bloc is stirring. Russia is bolstering its military cooperation with Iran, while China is promoting a “de-dollarization” and “de-Westernization” strategy centered around Iran, attempting to rewrite international rules.
From Ukraine to the Persian Gulf, and from the South China Sea to the Taiwan Strait, the world is entering a multifront confrontation. It is not just a military race, but a struggle between different systems and values.
Taiwan finds itself at the forefront of the confrontation between democracy and authoritarianism.
Taiwan is a global hub for strategy, democratic values and technology. Strategically located at a critical point in the first island chain, the nation controls the supply of the world’s most advanced semiconductors.
Taiwan is not only irreplaceable in the geopolitical landscape and the global tech industry, but it is also unique in the way that it is the only free and democratic political entity in the Chinese-speaking world. These achievements serve as Taiwan’s shield, a thorn in dictators’ side and a jewel cherished by the free world.
As the conflict in Ukraine drags on and the Middle East plunges into chaos, Europe observes in silence, while Japan is caught in a dilemma. Taiwan’s role has become increasingly clear.
Taiwan is not on the periphery, but the front line, no longer being a “troublemaker,” but a pillar safeguarding the values of freedom and democracy.
Even if the rules of the free world change, as long as Taiwan’s values remain steadfast, the world will see Taiwan not as a synonym of crisis, but as a beacon of freedom and democracy. The country is not a pawn to be manipulated, but a ray of hope for the world.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan, and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Fion Khan
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS