Since 1995, Global Views Monthly (遠見雜誌) has been conducting annual telephone surveys on local residents’ satisfaction with their county commissioners’ or city mayors’ performances. Due to the polling techniques and differences in public sentiments between the urban and rural areas, there is often a gap between the poll results and actual performance.
In this year’s survey, respondents were asked whether they were “satisfied” or “dissatisfied” with the overall performance of their commissioner or mayor since taking office. They were then asked to grade the overall performance and provide their opinion on whether performance in eight specific areas — education, environmental protection, public order, transportation, healthcare, tourism, firefighting and the economy — had “improved,” become “worse,” or remained “the same.”
Clearly, such satisfaction surveys reflect the subjective views of local residents, often influenced by their personal favoritism toward the politician, rather than offering an objective “evaluation” of local government performance.
For generations, my family and I have lived in Taitung County. The county commissioners have consistently received the highest “5-star” rating or at least a “4-star” rating in the surveys. While I do not deny the efforts of the commissioners, the more significant reason might lie in the honest and simple nature of Taitung residents.
The Taitung County Government only needs to make basic efforts to earn the public’s support, unlike the residents of Taipei, who have higher expectations. As former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) once remarked, it is difficult for a Taipei mayor’s approval rating to exceed 60 percent. Even after successfully hosting the 2017 Taipei Universiade, Ko’s approval was just slightly above 50 percent.
Similarly, despite successfully holding the recent World Masters Games, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) approval rate only rose to 60 percent.
None of the major development projects in Taitung, including the Jhihben (知本) recreational park, the deep sea water center and the Taitung Miramar Resort (美麗灣) build-operate-transfer project, have been successful. Yet, remarkably, local residents continue to offer their recognition and support.
Public administration has entered the era of “public management,” which attaches great importance to strategic and objective management. This approach involves constructing a performance evaluation system and establishing key performance indicators.
Evaluation is not merely about assigning grades, but is about identifying administrative flaws and uncovering blind spots during the process. Therefore, the Cabinet’s National Development Council should implement a comprehensive evaluation system for assessing local governments’ overall performance.
Furthermore, when the media evaluate the administrative performance of local governments, in addition to subjective satisfaction surveys, it would be more effective to reference objective government information provided by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics. This would allow for a more accurate selection of outstanding commissioners and mayors.
Chen Chien-hsien is the chairman of the Taitung County Sports Development Foundation and an assistant professor in Meiho University’s Department of Social Work.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS