Since 1995, Global Views Monthly (遠見雜誌) has been conducting annual telephone surveys on local residents’ satisfaction with their county commissioners’ or city mayors’ performances. Due to the polling techniques and differences in public sentiments between the urban and rural areas, there is often a gap between the poll results and actual performance.
In this year’s survey, respondents were asked whether they were “satisfied” or “dissatisfied” with the overall performance of their commissioner or mayor since taking office. They were then asked to grade the overall performance and provide their opinion on whether performance in eight specific areas — education, environmental protection, public order, transportation, healthcare, tourism, firefighting and the economy — had “improved,” become “worse,” or remained “the same.”
Clearly, such satisfaction surveys reflect the subjective views of local residents, often influenced by their personal favoritism toward the politician, rather than offering an objective “evaluation” of local government performance.
For generations, my family and I have lived in Taitung County. The county commissioners have consistently received the highest “5-star” rating or at least a “4-star” rating in the surveys. While I do not deny the efforts of the commissioners, the more significant reason might lie in the honest and simple nature of Taitung residents.
The Taitung County Government only needs to make basic efforts to earn the public’s support, unlike the residents of Taipei, who have higher expectations. As former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) once remarked, it is difficult for a Taipei mayor’s approval rating to exceed 60 percent. Even after successfully hosting the 2017 Taipei Universiade, Ko’s approval was just slightly above 50 percent.
Similarly, despite successfully holding the recent World Masters Games, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) approval rate only rose to 60 percent.
None of the major development projects in Taitung, including the Jhihben (知本) recreational park, the deep sea water center and the Taitung Miramar Resort (美麗灣) build-operate-transfer project, have been successful. Yet, remarkably, local residents continue to offer their recognition and support.
Public administration has entered the era of “public management,” which attaches great importance to strategic and objective management. This approach involves constructing a performance evaluation system and establishing key performance indicators.
Evaluation is not merely about assigning grades, but is about identifying administrative flaws and uncovering blind spots during the process. Therefore, the Cabinet’s National Development Council should implement a comprehensive evaluation system for assessing local governments’ overall performance.
Furthermore, when the media evaluate the administrative performance of local governments, in addition to subjective satisfaction surveys, it would be more effective to reference objective government information provided by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics. This would allow for a more accurate selection of outstanding commissioners and mayors.
Chen Chien-hsien is the chairman of the Taitung County Sports Development Foundation and an assistant professor in Meiho University’s Department of Social Work.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS