Czech military intelligence last week revealed that Chinese diplomats and intelligence officers followed Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and allegedly planned to stage an incident during her visit to Prague last year.
In March last year, Czech media reported that a Chinese diplomat ran a red light while tailing Hsiao’s car. A Czech public radio news Web site reported on Thursday that Chinese officials also had plans to stage a car crash, a claim later confirmed by Czech military intelligence.
The radio report cited a Czech Military Intelligence spokesperson who described the incident as “a case of physically following, to the point of endangering the Taiwanese vice president,” and said that the Chinese operatives also attempted to gather information on Hsiao’s schedule and meetings with Czech politicians.
The Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC), a cross-party alliance of lawmakers from more than 30 countries, issued a statement condemning the incident as an attempted act of state terror.
Following the revelation of the incident, Taiwan’s Presidential Office, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Mainland Affairs Council all condemned China’s actions and thanked the Czech government and IPAC for their support.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs has denied any wrongdoing by its diplomats and condemned the Czech Republic for allowing “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatist” Hsiao’s “sneaky visit.”
It is not surprising that China’s “wolf warrior” diplomats would engage in overseas coercive actions, despite the growing global condemnation of their aggressive actions.
However, what is shocking is that, aside from remaining silent and refraining from condemning China’s attempted political violence against an elected national leader, some opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers dismissed the incident as fake news and made jokes about it.
KMT Legislator Liao Hsien-hsiang (廖先翔) on an online talk show on Friday said that China “seems a bit lame for wanting to create a car accident and failing ... it should be fairly simple, but it could not even succeed in such a simple collision,” while laughing alongside Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯).
Liao’s remarks ignited widespread outrage online and among public figures, with many questioning his morality and allegiance as a lawmaker in Taiwan. The following day, he said that he was merely “teasing” the Chinese Communist Party for its incompetence, sarcastically adding that “Taiwanese don’t have to be afraid of the People’s Liberation Army,” because Taiwan’s “armed forces can definitely annihilate them.” He also implied that the incident was fake news, while Hsu said the Czech government should “get to the truth” of what happened, seemingly choosing to believe China over the Czech Republic.
Given this cavalier attitude, it is no wonder that so many KMT lawmakers are facing recall votes. Liao and Hsu are not isolated cases. KMT legislators have consistently gone out of their way to block defense and civil resilience initiatives, while pushing China-friendly policies, such as attempting to cut the entire budget for the nation’s first indigenous submarine program and proposing amendments to the Offshore Islands Development Act (離島建設條例), creating a “free-trade zone” that has been criticized by many as “opening a national security back door” for China.
As the KMT faces increasing pressure from the recall movement, the launch earlier this month of “Operation Patriot” by KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) seems particularly ironic, given that KMT lawmakers have shown little regard for national security.
Fortunately, many people have a choice next month through recall voting to express whether they believe the KMT can protect Taiwan’s democracy and guard their safety as it claims.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS