Over-the-top (OTT) boxes might be used by China as a channel for influence campaigns in Taiwan, Cable Broadband Institute in Taiwan chief executive officer Claudia Peng (彭淑芬) said on June 8.
Peng said that more than 7 million OTT devices used to stream Chinese content have been imported into Taiwan, and that the devices are “used as tools of cognitive warfare, quietly influencing the culture and ideology of Taiwan’s young people without people realizing it.”
Many hotels have Chinese OTT boxes installed in rooms, and the content they offer includes Chinese state media broadcaster China Central Television and various provincial satellite channels, she said.
However, despite the known potential for Chinese OTT boxes to be used for cognitive warfare, tackling their use remains challenging due to legislative limitations. To begin with, there is no law specifically designed to target cognitive warfare.
The National Security Act (國家安全法) covers collusion with foreign forces, and the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) addresses election influence campaigns and the disruption of public order, but neither has stipulations specifically prohibiting the consumption or dissemination of “united front” content.
The devices allegedly stream copyrighted content without authorization, which would be a contravention of the Copyright Act (著作權法), Peng said, adding that the law requires approval for the broadcast of Chinese programs.
However, if the government moved to ban OTT boxes, there would likely be protests, especially among those in the pan-blue camp and who hope for unification with China. Moreover, such a move would be ineffective, since such content can still be accessed from any personal computer or mobile device.
Illegally broadcasting the channels also constitutes a contravention of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), she said.
Authorities could impose fines on establishments found to be publicly broadcasting copyrighted content, but an outright ban on Chinese programming would be unlikely to have the intended effect. Young people are always likely to find ways to access the content they are interested in. A better solution to tackle cognitive warfare would be for Taiwan to invest more in the domestic film and TV industry.
For example, the Ministry of Culture could provide funding to studios that create programming highlighting unique aspects of Taiwanese society, Hoklo-language (commonly known as Taiwanese) content, and generally anything that speaks to a Taiwanese identity and cultural experience.
There might be pushback from opposition party members who espouse a cross-strait cultural identity, but the ministry could assure them that such programming would not be “anti-China” or intentionally refute aspects of a shared historical experience between Chinese and a portion of Taiwanese.
Instead, the focus could be on “Taiwanese” content, promoting the values that Taiwanese universally share. For example, referencing Taiwan’s diversity and free speech, liberty, democracy and the legalization of same-sex marriage.
There could also be content that portrays conscription — an experience shared by many Taiwanese men — and armed forces personnel as heroes.
While attempts to restrict Taiwanese access to certain information and content — even that considered harmful to Taiwan’s democracy — might be an uphill battle, the challenge offers a good opportunity to take seriously the funding of Taiwan’s own cultural industries, ensuring the production of high-quality, compelling content that resonates with Taiwanese audiences and reflects their values, interests and identity.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS