The mass recall movement marks a significant milestone in Taiwan’s history. The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday last week announced the results of its review into petitions to recall 24 lawmakers and one mayor, scheduling the vote for July 26.
The practice of using recall elections to oust politicians can be traced back more than 2,000 years to ancient Athens. The recall election serves as a mechanism to remove undesirable individuals, or those who violate societal rules and threaten civil order. The early form of recall election, inscribing the names of politicians on ostraca — the plural of ostracon, pottery sherds on which citizens inscribed names to vote for exile — as ballots, was meant to prevent politicians from abusing elected office.
The democratic practice of ostracism, which originated from the use of these ostraca, is a valuable export of Athenian democracy. Citizens would inscribe critical labels, such as “betrayer,” “traitor,” “slanderer,” or “main instigator” onto the ostraca. The sherds could also serve as historical records, avoiding the possibility of later revisionism by politicians. In Athenian democracy, citizens established various supervisory mechanisms to make sure the recall worked free from interference.
We call on the county and city local election commissions affiliated with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) not to act as turncoats of Taiwan. The local commissions should respect the rules set by the CEC, avoiding any deliberate, politically motivated violations of the law.
The actions of certain lawmakers have triggered an unprecedented feeling of unease among Taiwanese. Like the Athenians in ancient times, Taiwanese have initiated an ostracism-like election on the “turncoats” who might play a pivotal role in shaping the future of society. This recall election was launched by Taiwanese wanting to “ostracize” KMT and Taiwan People’s Party lawmakers for threatening constitutional violations and passing pro-China legislation.
However, the issue goes beyond the question of whether those lawmakers should be recalled: What truly matters is whether Taiwanese can continue to live in Taiwan as a home with peace and prosperity, for ourselves and generations to come.
We should all thank the civil groups involved, which have set a remarkable recall record in Taiwan’s political history, leaving an inspiring chapter.
Wong Chong-Gyiau is a former director of Tainan Theological College and Seminary.
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou Province, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS