The mass recall movement marks a significant milestone in Taiwan’s history. The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday last week announced the results of its review into petitions to recall 24 lawmakers and one mayor, scheduling the vote for July 26.
The practice of using recall elections to oust politicians can be traced back more than 2,000 years to ancient Athens. The recall election serves as a mechanism to remove undesirable individuals, or those who violate societal rules and threaten civil order. The early form of recall election, inscribing the names of politicians on ostraca — the plural of ostracon, pottery sherds on which citizens inscribed names to vote for exile — as ballots, was meant to prevent politicians from abusing elected office.
The democratic practice of ostracism, which originated from the use of these ostraca, is a valuable export of Athenian democracy. Citizens would inscribe critical labels, such as “betrayer,” “traitor,” “slanderer,” or “main instigator” onto the ostraca. The sherds could also serve as historical records, avoiding the possibility of later revisionism by politicians. In Athenian democracy, citizens established various supervisory mechanisms to make sure the recall worked free from interference.
We call on the county and city local election commissions affiliated with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) not to act as turncoats of Taiwan. The local commissions should respect the rules set by the CEC, avoiding any deliberate, politically motivated violations of the law.
The actions of certain lawmakers have triggered an unprecedented feeling of unease among Taiwanese. Like the Athenians in ancient times, Taiwanese have initiated an ostracism-like election on the “turncoats” who might play a pivotal role in shaping the future of society. This recall election was launched by Taiwanese wanting to “ostracize” KMT and Taiwan People’s Party lawmakers for threatening constitutional violations and passing pro-China legislation.
However, the issue goes beyond the question of whether those lawmakers should be recalled: What truly matters is whether Taiwanese can continue to live in Taiwan as a home with peace and prosperity, for ourselves and generations to come.
We should all thank the civil groups involved, which have set a remarkable recall record in Taiwan’s political history, leaving an inspiring chapter.
Wong Chong-Gyiau is a former director of Tainan Theological College and Seminary.
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS