Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) on Monday last week played an audio recording at a hearing of the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee to accuse a prosecutor of interrogating a suspect with a harsh tone. Huang later said the tape was an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated “demo tape,” triggering controversy over mixing fact with fiction to misrepresent judicial proceedings.
In the hearing, Huang questioned Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien (鄭銘謙) on the prosecutors’ improper interrogations of suspects and played what he called “an interrogation audio tape” that appeared to depict a female prosecutor harshly questioning a suspect, surnamed Chu (朱), who resembled Chu Yea-hu (朱亞虎), a defendant in the Core Pacific City (京華城) development project case who had confessed to bribing former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
When the minister warned that broadcasting material related to ongoing legal proceedings is illegal, Huang retracted his remarks and said the tape is “a demonstration tape,” without specifying its origin, to illustrate a harsh interrogation. Huang later told media that the tape was “an AI-processed piece” made by himself.
However, the tape released by Huang has been widely cited as “the prosecutor’s interrogation of Chu Yea-hu.” Even TPP-funded media and TPP members’ social media posts call it “evidence of improper interrogation of the Core Pacific city case’s defendant Chu.”
The party’s caucus deputy convener Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) also said that the tape is “a part of the prosecutors’ interrogation recording, which party members have heard several times.”
Huang’s tape has triggered heated controversy. The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office has launched an investigation into Huang’s tape on suspicion of misusing and counterfeiting investigation material to misrepresent ongoing legal proceedings. If the tape really is of an interrogation, Huang could have contravened the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法) by revealing classified materials from ongoing court proceedings and the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法) for violating the privacy of defendants.
On the other hand, if the tape actually is an AI-generated or fabricated piece derived from interrogation materials, Huang could have committed document forgery to misrepresent judicial and prosecutorial operations.
It should be further noted that Huang and the TPP have recently proposed an amendment to the Court Organization Act (法院組織法) to allow court proceedings to be broadcast live, which has aroused concern, and opposition from legal associations and civil rights groups.
To live stream trials is rare even among advanced democracies. The US, Germany and Japan permit video recording only under limited conditions. In Taiwan, the transparency of court trials has been and could be gradually advanced through documents disclosure, citizen judges and public observations. To broadcast trials without complementary measures would not only disrupt the legal process, but also put excessive stress on participants, jeopardize the privacy of victims and witnesses, and threaten fairness.
The Judges Association issued a statement questioning the source of Huang’s audio file, adding that such an approach could mislead the public, as well as suggesting that there is a risk of using congressional questioning to interfere with individual cases. Huang’s move has validated concerns that the potential live streaming of court activities could be misused and edited to manipulate public opinion and influence trials.
Huang’s tape has put the TPP on the verge of contravening the law by improperly interfering with the Core Pacific City case, and has caused harm to legislative discipline. More importantly, it justifies the ongoing nationwide recall of legislators who know the law, but willingly break it.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
RSS