Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) on Monday last week played an audio recording at a hearing of the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee to accuse a prosecutor of interrogating a suspect with a harsh tone. Huang later said the tape was an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated “demo tape,” triggering controversy over mixing fact with fiction to misrepresent judicial proceedings.
In the hearing, Huang questioned Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien (鄭銘謙) on the prosecutors’ improper interrogations of suspects and played what he called “an interrogation audio tape” that appeared to depict a female prosecutor harshly questioning a suspect, surnamed Chu (朱), who resembled Chu Yea-hu (朱亞虎), a defendant in the Core Pacific City (京華城) development project case who had confessed to bribing former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
When the minister warned that broadcasting material related to ongoing legal proceedings is illegal, Huang retracted his remarks and said the tape is “a demonstration tape,” without specifying its origin, to illustrate a harsh interrogation. Huang later told media that the tape was “an AI-processed piece” made by himself.
However, the tape released by Huang has been widely cited as “the prosecutor’s interrogation of Chu Yea-hu.” Even TPP-funded media and TPP members’ social media posts call it “evidence of improper interrogation of the Core Pacific city case’s defendant Chu.”
The party’s caucus deputy convener Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) also said that the tape is “a part of the prosecutors’ interrogation recording, which party members have heard several times.”
Huang’s tape has triggered heated controversy. The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office has launched an investigation into Huang’s tape on suspicion of misusing and counterfeiting investigation material to misrepresent ongoing legal proceedings. If the tape really is of an interrogation, Huang could have contravened the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法) by revealing classified materials from ongoing court proceedings and the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法) for violating the privacy of defendants.
On the other hand, if the tape actually is an AI-generated or fabricated piece derived from interrogation materials, Huang could have committed document forgery to misrepresent judicial and prosecutorial operations.
It should be further noted that Huang and the TPP have recently proposed an amendment to the Court Organization Act (法院組織法) to allow court proceedings to be broadcast live, which has aroused concern, and opposition from legal associations and civil rights groups.
To live stream trials is rare even among advanced democracies. The US, Germany and Japan permit video recording only under limited conditions. In Taiwan, the transparency of court trials has been and could be gradually advanced through documents disclosure, citizen judges and public observations. To broadcast trials without complementary measures would not only disrupt the legal process, but also put excessive stress on participants, jeopardize the privacy of victims and witnesses, and threaten fairness.
The Judges Association issued a statement questioning the source of Huang’s audio file, adding that such an approach could mislead the public, as well as suggesting that there is a risk of using congressional questioning to interfere with individual cases. Huang’s move has validated concerns that the potential live streaming of court activities could be misused and edited to manipulate public opinion and influence trials.
Huang’s tape has put the TPP on the verge of contravening the law by improperly interfering with the Core Pacific City case, and has caused harm to legislative discipline. More importantly, it justifies the ongoing nationwide recall of legislators who know the law, but willingly break it.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS