On Monday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei chapter director Huang Lu Chin-ru (黃呂錦茹) and her key staff were indicted for allegedly misusing personal information and forging documents.
The indictment said that the KMT broke the law by forging signatures in their recall petitions. However, the KMT leadership did not admit to the accusations nor issue an apology. Instead, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) appealed to the public for help, and accused the government of judicial persecution and said it was undertaking a witch hunt.
The KMT has been making trouble since winning a legislative majority last year. When the public launched a mass recall movement against its lawmakers to show their anger, the party responded by forging signatures for their own recall petitions.
There are four major reasons for recalling KMT lawmakers.
First, since losing power, the KMT has turned from being pro-US and anti-communist to the opposite, allying with China to control Taiwan. The party has also never condemned the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) threats against Taiwan.
During a visit to China in April last year, a delegation of pan-blue camp lawmakers, led by KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁), met with Wang Huning (王滬寧), a Chinese official in charge of the CCP’s “united front” work targeting Taiwan. When they returned, Fu led opposition lawmakers in passing several bills that attempted to paralyze the government, which have plunged the country into a state of chaos.
Second, for more than a year, opposition lawmakers have frozen the Constitutional Court, expanded the legislature’s power, infringed on the powers of the executive, control and judicial branches, and have amended the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法) and the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法). They have also removed or frozen the budgets for national defense, foreign affairs, science and technology, which are seriously affecting Taiwan’s defense and the government’s national policies, and making the whole public suffer.
If KMT lawmakers are not removed, the legislature would not be able to function normally. As a result, national defense, foreign affairs, economic development and people’s livelihoods would be hurt badly, and Taiwan would be exposed to the danger of being annexed by China.
Third, to counter the recalls against them, the KMT forged signatures in their recall petitions, including thousands of signatures of deceased people. Key personnel of KMT party chapters have been detained or prosecuted. Some civil affairs bureau officials in KMT-controlled Keelung City and Nantou County also allegedly misused household and personal information in their recall campaign and are being investigated.
Fourth, after key personnel from the KMT’s Taipei chapter were detained, Chu led KMT lawmakers and elected representatives in staging a protest in front of the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office, breaking the law. The area near the prosecutors’ office is restricted. He also smeared the government, saying it was carrying out judicial persecution, and accused President William Lai (賴清德) of acting like Adolf Hitler.
That analogy was condemned by the German Institute Taipei.
If KMT lawmakers are not removed, it would be difficult to maintain the judiciary and Taiwan’s international image.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS