Many people over the past two decades have called for the government to establish a sovereign wealth fund, with discussions mainly focused on whether it should be funded through Taiwan’s foreign exchange reserves; whether it would be managed by investment professionals, free of political interference; or what kind of oversight would be needed to prevent misuse, promote public trust and maximize the benefits of such a fund. No consensus has ever been reached.
After US President Donald Trump in April announced “reciprocal” tariffs against Taiwan and many other trading partners, causing turmoil in global financial markets, the call to establish a sovereign wealth fund has resurfaced. The Ministry of Economic Affairs, the central bank and other government agencies are once again talking about such a fund, as well as practical issues such as financial resources, operations and investments.
On May 20, President William Lai (賴清德) announced in his one-year anniversary speech the establishment of a sovereign wealth fund to invest in artificial intelligence (AI). After the announcement, the Executive Yuan decided the plan would be temporarily led by the National Development Council, while the central bank, the Ministry of Finance and other agencies would be convened to discuss the source of funds and its scale.
The plan to set up a sovereign wealth fund underlies the government’s attempt to boost Taiwan’s economic momentum, expand the nation’s global investments and increase its international presence, particularly in AI. Several other countries have already invested in technology upgrades in strategic areas — such as AI, quantum technology and energy transformation — through sovereign wealth funds. Taiwan also needs such a state-owned platform to drive technological independence and fortify industrial prowess.
Some experts have also highlighted a sovereign wealth fund’s potential to transform Taiwan’s financial and diplomatic strategy, while bolstering national security in the face of a changing geopolitical landscape. Just as Lai said in his speech that the fund would help Taiwan raise its global profile and connect with major target markets, strategic and prudent investing would create opportunities for Taiwan to increase its global influence, especially as it faces China’s rising military aggression.
Although Taiwan does not have a sovereign wealth fund, the government has other state-run funds — the National Development Fund, the Labor Insurance Fund, the Labor Pension Fund, the Public Service Pension Fund and the Postal Savings Fund, which are tasked with handling various investments and seek to obtain long-term stable returns. However, the main problems with those funds are poor oversight, unimpressive management, ill-advised planning and mediocre performance. If the government wants a large sovereign wealth fund to succeed, it needs to determine how it would be organized and managed.
There is also growing discussion about using a portion of the nation’s substantial foreign exchange reserves to establish the fund. That debate is likely to continue in the coming months among the central bank and other government agencies. Regardless, the main concern in establishing the fund is not to achieve significantly higher annual returns on Taiwan’s forex investments than the central bank or whether it should invest in high-risk markets or industries, but rather to focus on what the fund can do to benefit the nation as a whole economically, financially and diplomatically.
Admittedly, there are technical difficulties and political challenges ahead in the discussions about a sovereign wealth fund. Now that the president has outlined the direction of the fund, the government should focus on how to design a sovereign fund structure that is professional, robust, transparent and public-oriented, rather than whether Taiwan should do so or not.
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS