Internet celebrity Holger Chen (陳之漢) might call himself a peace ambassador, but really, he is just a clown in someone else’s circus. A loud one. The kind that hurls vulgarities when cornered and marvels at vending machines like he has just discovered fire.
During his recent trip to China, Chen bent over backward to praise whatever happened to cross his line of sight — vending machines, food delivery robots, roadside trees, rubbish bins and toilets. If someone had spat at him, he would probably praise the robust lung power of Chinese.
Boiled down, his trip was not about diplomacy, it was salesmanship. He was there to sell China to the Taiwanese audience.
However, let us pause a moment: What exactly was he selling?
Restrooms with doors? Sidewalk trees? Faster food delivery? Smart rubbish bins? Cheaper food? Who cares about things Taiwan already has — some better, some worse, but all familiar.
Chen is like someone trying to sell sand in the desert, failing to realize that his product is not rare, nor is it wanted. The only thing colder than his sales pitch was the public’s reception.
Because here is the truth: Taiwanese do not resist China because its buildings are low or its trains are slow.
So clowns such as Chen gain nothing by correcting a few outdated perceptions.
What Taiwanese resist is not infrastructure — it is authoritarianism.
They resist, because they cherish something far more precious — and far rarer — under the Chinese Communist Party: freedom.
Try selling us this, Holger: freedom of speech without the risk of disappearing; rule of law without interference from the ruling party; the right to elect our leaders and to criticize them when they fail; a press that asks questions instead of parroting slogans; world-class, affordable healthcare; a high standard of living; and the freedom to leave the country without needing a special permit.
These are the things that matter — not fast trains, not cashless payments and certainly not public toilets with doors.
Those are the shades people in the desert might actually buy.
However, Beijing has none to offer. So, instead, they send clowns with tattoos and livestreams, hoping that volume can substitute for value.
Of course, Chen’s admirers in China were entertained. So were his critics.
Most saw through the performance: a man who could not even admit he was from Taiwan when asked, who could not stay polite when questioned, who could not survive without the very freedoms he pretends to belittle.
He sells admiration. He sells awe.
What he does not sell is conviction.
Even the worst salesmen know that the product has to work.
No matter how many livestreams he wraps it in, authoritarianism does not sell in Taiwan.
Do not try to sell dictatorship to a democracy that already knows exactly what it is worth.
If Beijing is serious about selling China to Taiwanese, it needs to stop outsourcing the pitch to “united front” clowns. Taiwanese are tired of them — if not revolted by them. Do not send influencers. Send reform. Start with the product itself: stop the military threats, democratize the political system, lengthen the leash on human rights and let people speak freely. Then maybe, just maybe, the product might start to sell on its own.
John Cheng is a retired businessman from Hong Kong now residing in Taiwan.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS