As the sun sets on the third UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France, there is much to celebrate, but also much unfinished business for the world to address at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP30) in Belem, Brazil, later this year.
Against a backdrop of global uncertainty and questions about whether multilateral processes can still deliver, the nations represented in Nice were largely united on the need for a more ambitious response to the challenges facing our oceans, but this was only the first leg of the journey. To protect this life-preserving global commons in time, much more must be done ahead of COP30.
Among the outcomes to celebrate, the High Seas Treaty has made remarkable progress. With 19 nations ratifying it in Nice, and another dozen committing to do so, we are now on course to make this landmark global agreement operational by the start of next year, enabling the creation of marine protected areas on the high seas. That would plug an enormous hole in ocean governance.
Illustration: Mountain People
Achieving the goal of protecting at least 30 percent of the world’s oceans by 2030 is not possible without setting aside large areas of the vast high seas — an area representing two-thirds of the oceans and half our planet’s surface. Establishing effective marine protection is especially urgent in polar regions, which are on the front line of the climate crisis. The situation in the Southern Ocean is dire, demanding immediate action to advance long-stalled proposals for marine protected areas. Such protections would both safeguard the ocean’s ability to help mitigate climate change (by absorbing carbon) and increase marine species’ resilience against warming temperatures (such as by removing pressures from overfishing).
In Nice, several nations also announced significant new marine protections in their national waters, with French Polynesia announcing what, at nearly 5 million square kilometers, would be the world’s largest network of protected areas, and the conference delivered welcome progress toward combating plastic pollution and restricting the most harmful fishing practices. However, none of these milestones should be mistaken as a turning of the tide for ocean protection. Rather, each must be part of a broader shift — a rising tide of higher ambitions that still has further to go.
Consider what remains to be done.
First, we are still falling woefully short in designating and enforcing marine protection. Even after Nice, only 10 percent of oceans are now protected in some fashion. That is a long way from the 30 percent we need to protect by the end of the decade. Worse, many protected areas are protected in name only. For example, many hoped that an environmental champion such as France would have announced a strict ban on bottom trawling in its protected areas. Still, there is time for more nations to set an example, including at COP30.
Second, dollars still count. There remains a big gap between what has been pledged and what has been delivered. Globally, only US$1.2 billion annually is going toward ocean protection, less than 10 percent of what is needed, even when studies show that protecting 30 percent of oceans by 2030 could unlock US$85 billion annually by 2050. In fact, redirecting the money allocated to harmful fishing subsidies in just 10 nations would plug the financing gap for ocean protection. Government spending must rehabilitate, not debilitate, this critical resource.
Third, the silence in Nice on ending our fossil-fuel addiction was deafening. Although the world committed two years ago, at COP28 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to “transition away” from fossil fuels, this issue seems to be relitigated at every multilateral convening. With the climate crisis providing an existential threat to all life on our blue planet, new unmitigated offshore oil and gas development is antithetical to all our stated goals.
Still, one bright spot was the Blue NDC Challenge — launched by Brazil and France, and supported by eight inaugural nations — which is pushing for ocean-based measures to be included in national climate plans.
The Nice conference must become a springboard for greater ocean action in Belem. COP30 is the ideal platform to announce new marine protections and financing for conservation efforts in developing nations, and for resilience-building in vulnerable island and coastal countries.
As the COP30 president and a coastal country itself, Brazil has the opportunity to use the momentum generated in Nice to integrate the world’s response to our connected climate and ocean crises. We have a choice. We can be the generation that turned ambition into action, or we can let our most important global commons collapse irretrievably. The oceans cannot wait. COP30 must deliver.
John F. Kerry is a former US secretary of state and special presidential envoy for climate.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Starting this month, young women in Denmark would be subject to conscription on the same terms as men. All Danes, regardless of gender, would be required to register for military assessment, and eligible individuals would be selected through a lottery-based draft. In addition, service time would be increased to 11 months, and conscript numbers would grow to meet national defense targets. Denmark is not alone. In the past few years, several European countries, most notably Sweden and Norway, have adopted gender-neutral conscription systems. Latvia is moving in the same direction. The war in Ukraine has accelerated this trend. Faced with the
RSS