Since 2017, Amnesty International, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and civil society sponsorship programs have been working together to provide support for refugees, helping them rebuild their lives.
To date, millions of people worldwide have received aid, including housing assistance, education for children, language training and emotional support. Countries such as Argentina, Australia, Ireland and the UK have successfully implemented these models, bringing stability and hope to displaced people.
Taiwan introduced a draft refugee law as early as 2005, but two decades later, no legislative progress has been made. As a result, asylum seekers in Taiwan remain unprotected by clear legal procedures. The absence of a refugee law does not prevent people from arriving; instead, it forces asylum seekers into an uncertain legal status.
Some remain stranded in Taiwan due to conflicts in their home countries, while others arrive without knowing Taiwan lacks refugee legislation. This legal vacuum perpetuates their insecurity and distress.
With global conflicts escalating, Taiwan urgently needs to establish a refugee law and protective mechanisms to comply with the international principle of non-refoulement. Every asylum case must be carefully examined to determine whether repatriation is appropriate or if further protection is necessary.
At least 40 people have yet to have their cases processed under any legal framework, leaving them in limbo and exposing them to prolonged hardship — effectively a form of secondary victimization.
The government should follow international models, collaborate with civil society and provide practical assistance to asylum seekers. The swift passage of a refugee law would ensure procedural clarity for enforcement personnel and asylum seekers, bolstering Taiwan’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law.
Chiu E-ling is the executive director of Amnesty International Taiwan.
There has been much catastrophizing in Taiwan recently about America becoming more unreliable as a bulwark against Chinese pressure. Some of this has been sparked by debates in Washington about whether the United States should defend Taiwan in event of conflict. There also were understandable anxieties about whether President Trump would sacrifice Taiwan’s interests for a trade deal when he sat down with President Xi (習近平) in late October. On top of that, Taiwan’s opposition political leaders have sought to score political points by attacking the Lai (賴清德) administration for mishandling relations with the United States. Part of this budding anxiety
The diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments in the Japanese Diet continues to escalate. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong (傅聰) wrote that, “if Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression.” There was no indication that Fu was aware of the irony implicit in the complaint. Until this point, Beijing had limited its remonstrations to diplomatic summonses and weaponization of economic levers, such as banning Japanese seafood imports, discouraging Chinese from traveling to Japan or issuing
Tokyo-Beijing relations have been rapidly deteriorating over the past two weeks as China tries to punish Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks about Taiwan earlier this month, and the off-ramp to this conflict is yet to be seen. Takaichi saying that a “Taiwan contingency” could cause a “situation threatening Japan’s survival” — which would allow Japan to act in self-defense — has drawn Beijing’s ire and sparked retaliatory measures. Her remark did not gain public attention until Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) made an apparent threat to behead her. The two sides lodged protests against each
On Nov. 8, newly elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) and Vice Chairman Chi Lin-len (季麟連) attended a memorial for White Terror era victims, during which convicted Chinese Communist Party (CCP) spies such as Wu Shi (吳石) were also honored. Cheng’s participation in the ceremony, which she said was part of her efforts to promote cross-strait reconciliation, has trapped herself and her party into the KMT’s dark past, and risks putting the party back on its old disastrous road. Wu, a lieutenant general who was the Ministry of National Defense’s deputy chief of the general staff, was recruited