Since 2017, Amnesty International, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and civil society sponsorship programs have been working together to provide support for refugees, helping them rebuild their lives.
To date, millions of people worldwide have received aid, including housing assistance, education for children, language training and emotional support. Countries such as Argentina, Australia, Ireland and the UK have successfully implemented these models, bringing stability and hope to displaced people.
Taiwan introduced a draft refugee law as early as 2005, but two decades later, no legislative progress has been made. As a result, asylum seekers in Taiwan remain unprotected by clear legal procedures. The absence of a refugee law does not prevent people from arriving; instead, it forces asylum seekers into an uncertain legal status.
Some remain stranded in Taiwan due to conflicts in their home countries, while others arrive without knowing Taiwan lacks refugee legislation. This legal vacuum perpetuates their insecurity and distress.
With global conflicts escalating, Taiwan urgently needs to establish a refugee law and protective mechanisms to comply with the international principle of non-refoulement. Every asylum case must be carefully examined to determine whether repatriation is appropriate or if further protection is necessary.
At least 40 people have yet to have their cases processed under any legal framework, leaving them in limbo and exposing them to prolonged hardship — effectively a form of secondary victimization.
The government should follow international models, collaborate with civil society and provide practical assistance to asylum seekers. The swift passage of a refugee law would ensure procedural clarity for enforcement personnel and asylum seekers, bolstering Taiwan’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law.
Chiu E-ling is the executive director of Amnesty International Taiwan.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS