Since 2017, Amnesty International, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and civil society sponsorship programs have been working together to provide support for refugees, helping them rebuild their lives.
To date, millions of people worldwide have received aid, including housing assistance, education for children, language training and emotional support. Countries such as Argentina, Australia, Ireland and the UK have successfully implemented these models, bringing stability and hope to displaced people.
Taiwan introduced a draft refugee law as early as 2005, but two decades later, no legislative progress has been made. As a result, asylum seekers in Taiwan remain unprotected by clear legal procedures. The absence of a refugee law does not prevent people from arriving; instead, it forces asylum seekers into an uncertain legal status.
Some remain stranded in Taiwan due to conflicts in their home countries, while others arrive without knowing Taiwan lacks refugee legislation. This legal vacuum perpetuates their insecurity and distress.
With global conflicts escalating, Taiwan urgently needs to establish a refugee law and protective mechanisms to comply with the international principle of non-refoulement. Every asylum case must be carefully examined to determine whether repatriation is appropriate or if further protection is necessary.
At least 40 people have yet to have their cases processed under any legal framework, leaving them in limbo and exposing them to prolonged hardship — effectively a form of secondary victimization.
The government should follow international models, collaborate with civil society and provide practical assistance to asylum seekers. The swift passage of a refugee law would ensure procedural clarity for enforcement personnel and asylum seekers, bolstering Taiwan’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law.
Chiu E-ling is the executive director of Amnesty International Taiwan.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS