Taiwan must shape the information space early to avoid being blamed for escalation if it responds with force to Chinese incursions, a former US Navy intelligence head said on Friday last week.
In such a scenario, Taiwan should seek to frame Chinese forces as aggressors and a threat to the entire region, former US Office of Naval Intelligence commander Mike Studeman told the Central News Agency when asked to comment on the outcome of a tabletop war game held in Taipei last week.
The exercise simulated a Chinese naval intrusion into Taiwan’s territorial waters in 2030.
In the war game, Taiwan chose not to immediately strike the Chinese navy vessels to avoid being blamed for an escalation.
However, former US officials participating in the exercise said that Taiwan might eventually need to open fire to expel Chinese intruders, but added that it should give them advance warning.
Taiwan’s failure to demonstrate resolve would “only invite deeper and unacceptable encroachments,” Studeman said.
Taiwan is guided by concern that the US would not come to its aid if it were to be seen as the cause of escalation. The Taiwan fact sheet on the US Department of State Web site reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-Strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.”
It is highly unlikely that any country’s administration would blame Taiwan if it were to fire upon a foreign navy that failed to leave its waters following a warning. It is also unlikely that a US decision to intervene to assist with Taiwan’s defense during a conflict would be contingent upon Taiwan not defending itself. If anything, the US would probably be more reluctant to intervene if Taiwan did not fire upon a foreign aggressor challenging its sovereignty and ignoring warning calls.
A US president’s decision on whether to help defend Taiwan would partially depend on Taipei’s ability and willingness to defend itself, retired US admiral and former US Pacific Fleet commander Dennis Blair said on Wednesday last week.
Last week’s tabletop exercises concluded that Taiwan might need to resist an invasion attempt for a few months to give allies time to assist. Part of Taiwan’s ability to do so would hinge upon a timely response to the initial phase of the attempt. If China were to be able to land a contingent of troops on Taiwan proper before Taiwanese forces even fired a shot, that would allow China to carry out sabotage missions.
Commenting on the tabletop exercise, a source on Sunday said that during the simulation, the Taiwanese team put forces in a state of heightened readiness and surveillance after Chinese vessels entered Taiwan’s territorial waters. Presumably, in a real-life scenario, Taiwanese forces would already be on heightened alert whenever Chinese vessels cross the median line of the Taiwan Strait. They should be prepared to open fire before the Chinese vessels even reached 12 nautical miles (22.2km) from Taiwan’s shore, if the vessels’ crews failed to explain the encroachment and stayed their course toward shore.
In April there was a public outcry online after a Chinese cruise ship, the Gulangyu (鼓浪嶼號), sailed within 2 nautical miles of Pingtung County’s Hengchun Peninsula. Following the incident, one analyst said that China could transport hundreds of troops to Taiwan undetected using such a vessel.
Taiwan should invest heavily in its coast guard, including through the purchase of sea and underwater drones, so that it can effectively monitor its extensive coastlines. It should also establish a clear protocol for engaging Chinese vessels that intrude into its territorial waters, and have the resolve to fire upon intruders in a timely manner if necessary.
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical