Taiwan must shape the information space early to avoid being blamed for escalation if it responds with force to Chinese incursions, a former US Navy intelligence head said on Friday last week.
In such a scenario, Taiwan should seek to frame Chinese forces as aggressors and a threat to the entire region, former US Office of Naval Intelligence commander Mike Studeman told the Central News Agency when asked to comment on the outcome of a tabletop war game held in Taipei last week.
The exercise simulated a Chinese naval intrusion into Taiwan’s territorial waters in 2030.
In the war game, Taiwan chose not to immediately strike the Chinese navy vessels to avoid being blamed for an escalation.
However, former US officials participating in the exercise said that Taiwan might eventually need to open fire to expel Chinese intruders, but added that it should give them advance warning.
Taiwan’s failure to demonstrate resolve would “only invite deeper and unacceptable encroachments,” Studeman said.
Taiwan is guided by concern that the US would not come to its aid if it were to be seen as the cause of escalation. The Taiwan fact sheet on the US Department of State Web site reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-Strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.”
It is highly unlikely that any country’s administration would blame Taiwan if it were to fire upon a foreign navy that failed to leave its waters following a warning. It is also unlikely that a US decision to intervene to assist with Taiwan’s defense during a conflict would be contingent upon Taiwan not defending itself. If anything, the US would probably be more reluctant to intervene if Taiwan did not fire upon a foreign aggressor challenging its sovereignty and ignoring warning calls.
A US president’s decision on whether to help defend Taiwan would partially depend on Taipei’s ability and willingness to defend itself, retired US admiral and former US Pacific Fleet commander Dennis Blair said on Wednesday last week.
Last week’s tabletop exercises concluded that Taiwan might need to resist an invasion attempt for a few months to give allies time to assist. Part of Taiwan’s ability to do so would hinge upon a timely response to the initial phase of the attempt. If China were to be able to land a contingent of troops on Taiwan proper before Taiwanese forces even fired a shot, that would allow China to carry out sabotage missions.
Commenting on the tabletop exercise, a source on Sunday said that during the simulation, the Taiwanese team put forces in a state of heightened readiness and surveillance after Chinese vessels entered Taiwan’s territorial waters. Presumably, in a real-life scenario, Taiwanese forces would already be on heightened alert whenever Chinese vessels cross the median line of the Taiwan Strait. They should be prepared to open fire before the Chinese vessels even reached 12 nautical miles (22.2km) from Taiwan’s shore, if the vessels’ crews failed to explain the encroachment and stayed their course toward shore.
In April there was a public outcry online after a Chinese cruise ship, the Gulangyu (鼓浪嶼號), sailed within 2 nautical miles of Pingtung County’s Hengchun Peninsula. Following the incident, one analyst said that China could transport hundreds of troops to Taiwan undetected using such a vessel.
Taiwan should invest heavily in its coast guard, including through the purchase of sea and underwater drones, so that it can effectively monitor its extensive coastlines. It should also establish a clear protocol for engaging Chinese vessels that intrude into its territorial waters, and have the resolve to fire upon intruders in a timely manner if necessary.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) last week made a rare visit to the Philippines, which not only deepened bilateral economic ties, but also signaled a diplomatic breakthrough in the face of growing tensions with China. Lin’s trip marks the second-known visit by a Taiwanese foreign minister since Manila and Beijing established diplomatic ties in 1975; then-minister Chang Hsiao-yen (章孝嚴) took a “vacation” in the Philippines in 1997. As Taiwan is one of the Philippines’ top 10 economic partners, Lin visited Manila and other cities to promote the Taiwan-Philippines Economic Corridor, with an eye to connecting it with the Luzon