The White House’s review of the AUKUS pact — a security arrangement between the US, the UK and Australia — is rattling one of Washington’s closest alliances and playing right into China’s hands. It sends yet another signal that “America first” might just mean everyone else alone.
First announced by former US president Joe Biden in 2021, the multibillion-dollar deal commits Washington and London to help Canberra develop a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines over 30 years. It was designed to help counter Beijing’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region.
US President Donald Trump’s administration has just put those plans in limbo. The review will determine whether AUKUS is “aligned with the president’s America first agenda,” the US Department of Defense said, adding that it is also aimed at making sure allies contribute more to collective security and that the US’ defense industrial base can meet domestic needs.
These are valid concerns. US submarine production has been plagued by persistent delays and ballooning costs. Elbridge Colby, a top policy adviser who is expected to play a central role in the study, has long warned that the US could end up short on submarines at a critical moment in its deterrence strategy against China. In particular, Colby is worried about a hypothetical conflict around Taiwan.
This is yet another example of the White House’s pay-to-play approach to global partnerships and how allies left out in the cold will have to navigate the new environment.
“Regardless of how this review goes, Australia should be reducing its dependence on US weapons and technology,” Michael Shoebridge, founder and director of Strategic Analysis, a Canberra-based political consultancy, told me. “We are probably slower than others in realizing that America remains our most powerful partner, but we have to do more for ourselves.”
European nations have already had a taste of what it means to be a US ally in Trump’s world. At the Munich Security Conference earlier this year, US Vice President J.D. Vance chastised participants for not doing enough to bolster collective security.
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth delivered a similar message to Asian partners at the Shangri-La conference, a regional security summit in Singapore. Countries like Australia, Japan and South Korea have long relied on the US as a security guarantor, but now Washington wants them to carry more of the load and increase military budgets.
Meeting with Australian Minister for Defence Richard Marles on the sidelines, Hegseth told him that Canberra needs to up its military spending target to 3.5 percent of GDP. Currently, Australia is on track for about 2.4 percent by the mid 2030s and has already committed to additional investment.
For Beijing, each move that reduces the Trump administration’s influence in the region is welcomed as a sign of disengagement. When AUKUS was first announced, China expressed outrage at what it viewed as evidence of Washington’s attempts at containment.
On Thursday last week, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs repeated its resistance to the pact, adding that it opposes “anything that amplifies the risk of nuclear proliferation and exacerbates arms race.”
A retooling of the treaty will reinforce the narrative Beijing has been pushing that the US is an untrustworthy partner.
In all likelihood, AUKUS will survive, but perhaps not in its current form. Canberra might be forced to make compromises and offer concessions to Washington, including raising its defense capabilities.
However, even if the public rhetoric is one of long-term cooperation, Australia should begin weighing its options carefully. It could work more closely with other partners.
In May, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen raised the prospect of a formal defense agreement between the trading bloc and Australia. While in reality this would be challenging given the number of countries involved, partnerships like this are worth exploring and should be pursued.
The country has already begun strengthening defense ties with Japan through reciprocal access agreements, and worked with India under the Quad framework on maritime security and military exercises. These steps offer a foundation for a more multipolar security strategy, one that does not always lean so heavily on Washington’s shifting priorities.
Whether the US leader reaffirms the pact or reshapes it, the review should serve as a wake-up call. For Australia, it is a reminder that even the closest alliances are only as stable as the political moment that defines them.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS