In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating.
BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability.
The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures.
BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which it issues “e-debt certificates.”
Suppliers can either redeem the certificates upon maturity or transfer them to others within BYD’s supply chain network.
However, such digital instruments are simply bilateral credit agreements between BYD and the supplier.
So how long does it take to get paid? BYD typically follows a net 30 to 60 payment cycle, with the D-chain system adding an additional six to eight months to that period. In practice, that stretches the total payment period to between eight and 10 months.
That approach greatly reduces BYD’s financial pressure, but is to the considerable disadvantage of its suppliers.
By tying its suppliers to the D-chain platform, BYD can integrate them into its own financial ecosystem, tightening control over its supply chain.
The model also allows BYD to circumvent traditional financial oversight, as it avoids issuing regular commercial paper and standard banking transactions.
Last year alone, the D-chain platform accumulated more than 400 billion yuan (US$55.64 billion) in interest-free payables, enabling BYD to save substantially on interest expenses.
However, if a supplier requires early payment, it has to offer an interest rebate to BYD — often as high as 5 to 10 percent — further squeezing supplier profit margins.
The issue of long days sales outstanding (DSO) has long been a problematic factor in doing businesses in China. It has worsened amid the ongoing economic slowdown in China.
China’s average DSO rose to 141 days last year — an increase of eight days from the previous year — compared with an average of about 70 days in Taiwan and the US, trade data showed.
Despite being the world’s largest automaker by production volume, BYD relies on cutthroat tactics to sustain its growth — such as selling “zero kilometer used cars,” which are registered, but never driven, at discounted prices to boost sales.
As BYD’s output continues to expand, the financial grip of its D-chain platform on suppliers would only tighten. The situation inevitably recalls the financial crisis of China’s Evergrande Group, which relied on the excessive use of “commercial acceptance bills,” leading to widespread financial damage among its suppliers just a few years ago.
Honda Chen is a senior researcher at the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS