The government faces several obstacles to implementing a proposal to rename roads — spelled Zhongzheng (中正) in Taipei and Jhongjheng in other parts of the nation — commemorating former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). However, replacing the Presidential Office Building would be a more feasible goal, and should be considered one of the most important policy initiatives.
As is widely known, the Presidential Office Building was originally known as the Office of the Governor-General of Taiwan during the Japanese colonial period. It is not only a century-old historical building, but a symbol of authoritarianism.
The building — at the intersection of Chongqing S Road and Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei’s Zhongzheng District (中正) — does not have any outer perimeter walls, and therefore lacks defense in depth. Vehicles have on more than one occasion attempted to ram into the building, raising serious safety concerns.
In the past few years, various reports have said that China has constructed a full-scale recreation of parts of Taipei — including a replica of the Presidential Office Building and its surrounding structures — that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army uses to simulate potential decapitation strikes.
With consideration to historic sites, authoritarianism and national security, the Executive Yuan should select a new location site and draw up blueprints to build a modern Presidential Office Building that can serve as a working headquarters for the president, along with other major government departments.
President William Lai (賴清德) on Tuesday last week welcomed Marshallese President Hilda Heine to Taiwan with full military honors during a state visit. However, a sudden downpour forced the heads of state to walk the red carpet while getting soaked in the rain, returning to tents to deliver their remarks.
When planning a new Presidential Office Building, in addition to incorporating safety and security measures, it should be designed to account for weather to avoid unexpected situations as occurred last week, as Taiwan’s subtropical climate makes sudden showers common, even on sunny days.
Constructing a new Presidential Office Building is aimed at long-term stability and security. If Lai promotes such an initiative, all future presidents — regardless of political party — would undoubtedly benefit.
Fang Fu-chuan is an international trader.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed