Since the Patient Right to Autonomy Act (病人自主權利法) took effect in 2019, the uptake rate for advance directives, also known as “advance decisions,” has fallen short of expectations, lower than 1 percent. That is mainly because the advance care planning (ACP) consultation costs about NT$2,000 to NT$3,500, which reduces people’s willingness to make living wills.
Although the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s Department of Health Affairs oversees the act, the ministry’s cash-strapped National Health Insurance (NHI) Administration is responsible for funding affairs related to it, and the administration has few dollars to promote ACP. The ministry should set up a separate budget for ACP promotion, to create more room for its development. It should not rely on the NHI for everything.
The NHI was expanded to cover ACP fees for people aged 65 or older with severe injuries or illnesses or multiple chronic diseases, who are now exempt from paying for the consultation fee, a change that it is estimated to benefit 1.8 million people. By doing so, the ministry is aiming to increase the number of living will signatories by 20,000 to reach its 40,000 goal this year. Still, a gap remains between that and the ministry’s original goal of covering the fees for everyone by next year.
The ACP differs from do not resuscitate (DNR) documents in that the latter does not require a consultation from a professional medical team, which makes the promotion of DNRs simpler and easier. Signing an advance decision needs to go through ACP conducted by a professional medical team, which naturally incurs costs, with people needing to pay NT$2,000 to NT$3,500 out of their own pockets for ACP first to sign an advance decision. That is why the signing rate is low.
To promote advance decision signing, the NHI Administration is now covering the ACP fees for those with mild dementia, and those older than 65 with major injuries or illnesses, who are not only hospice patients, but also included in the home-based medical integration program.
However, the number of people in that category is quite low. Even though the administration has expanded the scope of coverage to two more groups starting last month, the advance decision signing rate is unlikely to rise to a significant degree.
To promote advance decision signing, it is not enough to rely solely on NHI coverage. If the ministry is truly determined to boost the signing rate, it should make available additional funds to expand coverage, encouraging people to take an ACP and sign an advance decision.
In addition to budgetary funding, due to a labor shortage for the ACP consultation at some hospitals, people who make an appointment for the service might need to wait one to three months. Faced with staffing problems, the ministry should also come up with some incentives. Only with sufficient budget and staff for ACP can the government revitalize the advance decision signing rate.
Tsai Ming-chung is director of Fengan Polyclinic.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS