Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history.
Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them.
No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper.
The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) manufacturing capabilities.
The 3-nanometer process is more than just a technical issue, it is a full-chain challenge encompassing materials, equipment and production workflows.
TSMC and Samsung are the only companies in the world capable of stably mass-producing 3-nanometer chips, with the former holding an overwhelming market advantage.
If Xiaomi’s so-called “independently developed” Xring O1’s fabrication requires outsourcing, its claim of autonomy is meaningless.
Whoever is willing to take on this task would effectively be aiding the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in establishing a false narrative of technological independence under the banner of chip nationalism, thereby putting themselves at risk of becoming entangled in geopolitical and trade tensions.
Given the escalating US-China technological and trade tensions, helping Chinese firms mass-produce advanced chips would inevitably conflict with US tariffs and sanctions mechanisms.
US President Donald Trump imposed high tariffs on high-tech products tied to China’s supply chain, and any products associated with the CCP’s “military-civil fusion” are considered strategic risks.
If TSMC were to manufacture chips designed by China, the US would likely regard the move as indirectly supporting Chinese strategic technologies.
This would give the US ample reason to exert pressure, impose sanctions or even cut off critical parts of TSMC’s supply chain.
The announcement of Xiaomi’s Xring O1 chip was a political publicity stunt.
It serves to gloss over the CCP’s narrative of being a technological superpower and attempts to use private enterprise to repackage the soft power of national strategy.
In reality, it is merely labeling design achievements as “independent,” only to outsource manufacturing to overseas foundries and reimport the finished products to be sold in the domestic market.
Under this framework, it would be impossible for China to escape this bottleneck in advanced chip manufacturing, let alone achieve true strategic autonomy.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
Taiwan’s unconditional support “for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India to safeguard national security and fight terrorist forces that cross borders to attack innocent civilians” marked a monumental shift in the relationship between Taipei and New Delhi. At a time when the Indian government sent several delegations of parliament members to convey to the rest of the world Pakistan’s role in sponsoring terrorism against India, Taiwan became one of the few nations that unequivocally supported India’s military operation, “Sindhoor.” Sure, this change in bilateral ties did not happen in a vacuum. Over the past decade,
RSS