News media have reported that this year’s military academy recruitment failed to meet expectations.
This shortfall was clearly not part of the Ministry of National Defense’s plans, as the number of cadets admitted each year is calibrated to match the military’s projected personnel needs four years after enrollment — essentially, one cadet is enrolled per projected open position.
Therefore, all admitted cadets are expected to fill essential roles upon graduation, regardless of gender.
However, a significant problem emerges if recruitment falls more than 25 percent below the planned target.
Such a shortfall can seriously affect the budget and quality of education over the following four years, as well as disrupt future personnel assignments.
In addition, departments initially slated to admit a specific number of students might need to merge with other departments due to low enrollment, further diminishing the appeal of joining the academy.
The ministry should act swiftly to address the enrollment shortfall.
Before enlistment training begins next month, it should conduct a comprehensive survey of all active-duty non-commissioned officers and soldiers with a high school or vocational school education to identify potential candidates for officer training.
Those who express interest in attending a military academy could be considered for admission based on their performance and recommendations from commanding officers.
This approach would help academies fill the current enrollment gap, ensuring that future officer allocations at the grassroots level remain unaffected four years from now.
Beginning next year, in addition to the current system of admitting military academy students based on standardized test scores, a separate and independent recruitment process should be introduced.
It should be similar to the one I experienced more than 30 years ago.
Back then, I performed poorly on the college entrance exam, but I was fortunate enough to be given a second chance through the military academy joint entrance exam. This ultimately led to my admission into a military academy and my career as a professional soldier.
In today’s context of declining birthrates and a shrinking student population, the ministry can no longer rely on just a single channel for student recruitment.
The ministry should adopt a more diversified approach to ensure that more young people have the opportunity to enter military academies.
This way the ministry could prevent the armed forces from missing out on more valuable young talent.
Chen Hung-hui is a military instructor and university life resources officer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS