News media have reported that this year’s military academy recruitment failed to meet expectations.
This shortfall was clearly not part of the Ministry of National Defense’s plans, as the number of cadets admitted each year is calibrated to match the military’s projected personnel needs four years after enrollment — essentially, one cadet is enrolled per projected open position.
Therefore, all admitted cadets are expected to fill essential roles upon graduation, regardless of gender.
However, a significant problem emerges if recruitment falls more than 25 percent below the planned target.
Such a shortfall can seriously affect the budget and quality of education over the following four years, as well as disrupt future personnel assignments.
In addition, departments initially slated to admit a specific number of students might need to merge with other departments due to low enrollment, further diminishing the appeal of joining the academy.
The ministry should act swiftly to address the enrollment shortfall.
Before enlistment training begins next month, it should conduct a comprehensive survey of all active-duty non-commissioned officers and soldiers with a high school or vocational school education to identify potential candidates for officer training.
Those who express interest in attending a military academy could be considered for admission based on their performance and recommendations from commanding officers.
This approach would help academies fill the current enrollment gap, ensuring that future officer allocations at the grassroots level remain unaffected four years from now.
Beginning next year, in addition to the current system of admitting military academy students based on standardized test scores, a separate and independent recruitment process should be introduced.
It should be similar to the one I experienced more than 30 years ago.
Back then, I performed poorly on the college entrance exam, but I was fortunate enough to be given a second chance through the military academy joint entrance exam. This ultimately led to my admission into a military academy and my career as a professional soldier.
In today’s context of declining birthrates and a shrinking student population, the ministry can no longer rely on just a single channel for student recruitment.
The ministry should adopt a more diversified approach to ensure that more young people have the opportunity to enter military academies.
This way the ministry could prevent the armed forces from missing out on more valuable young talent.
Chen Hung-hui is a military instructor and university life resources officer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when