Taiwan’s economy is forecast to grow 3.1 percent year-on-year this year, driven by steady demand for the electronic components (including semiconductors) and information and communications technology products amid the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported last week. Yet this prediction comes with a caveat: The economic momentum would likely be robust in the first half of the year, as GDP is projected to increase by an annual rate of 5.35 percent, but in the second half, it might weaken sharply with growth of just 1 percent from a year earlier. The decelerated growth in the bottom half is mainly due to US tariff policy that could affect foreign trade and domestic demand in consumer spending, investments and exports, the DGBAS said.
The 1 percent growth for the second half of the year is a downward adjustment from the agency’s previous 2.93 percent estimate and would be the lowest expansion for the same period over the past two-and-a-half years. Exports of goods and services are projected to contract by 3.2 percent, and private investment is forecast to decline 0.73 percent, while private consumption is predicted to grow 1.87 percent in the second half compared with a year ago, all worse than the original forecasts.
Despite soaring demand for the AI-related semiconductors and servers that Taiwan excels at producing, the nation’s economic growth is not without risks, as US President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the US government’s ongoing review of export controls and sanctions on Chinese goods could impact Taiwan’s export-driven economy. There are also challenges for the domestic job market and household incomes.
The uncertainty of Trump’s tariff policy has intensified financial market volatility and raised household financial risks. If the job market becomes more severe, it might also affect debt repayment, necessitating close observation of changes in the debt servicing capacity of some households with higher debt burdens, the central bank said in its annual financial stability report last week.
The report showed that household borrowing expanded continuously last year, reaching NT$23.7 trillion (US$790.3 billion), equivalent to 92.62 percent of Taiwan’s GDP, up from 90.27 percent the previous year and higher than those in the US, Japan and South Korea. The main purpose of household borrowing last year was to purchase real-estate, accounting for 61.29 percent of total borrowing, followed by 36.59 percent for working capital needs, the report found.
Owing to a higher annual growth of 11.52 percent in Taiwan’s household borrowing last year, coupled with the ratio of household borrowing to total disposable income rising 1.52 times in the year, the increasing debt burden for the household sector warrants close attention, the report said.
By and large, Taiwan’s indebted household sector is susceptible to job losses and real income declines caused by increases in public utility rates and train tickets, as well as the effects of Trump’s tariffs.
While the household sector’s strong net worth — at more than eight times the nation’s GDP in 2023 — should help cushion the impact of any adverse shocks, Taiwan’s high household debt would still weigh on consumption and affect the nation’s economic growth in the long term.
Overall, the uncertainty of US trade policies has caused significant fluctuations in global financial markets, and the spillover effect of a tightening financial situation might affect the growth of global and domestic economies, putting pressure on Taiwanese companies and the debt repayment capacity of the household sector. It would also indirectly affect the real-estate market. Against that backdrop, the government must pay close attention to the effects of global trade developments, hoping for the best and preparing for the worst.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
Taiwan’s unconditional support “for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India to safeguard national security and fight terrorist forces that cross borders to attack innocent civilians” marked a monumental shift in the relationship between Taipei and New Delhi. At a time when the Indian government sent several delegations of parliament members to convey to the rest of the world Pakistan’s role in sponsoring terrorism against India, Taiwan became one of the few nations that unequivocally supported India’s military operation, “Sindhoor.” Sure, this change in bilateral ties did not happen in a vacuum. Over the past decade,