Chinese academic Zhang Weiwei (張維為) recently said that after Taiwan is “unified” with China, “governing Taiwan would be easier than governing Hong Kong” as young Taiwanese are fond of using Chinese social media apps such as Xiaohongshu (小紅書, or “RedNote”). It would be easy to dismiss the Fudan University professor’s remarks as bluster, but it does highlight a worrisome trend — Chinese social media are infiltrating and spreading Beijing’s message and influence in Taiwan.
Cognitive warfare has long been one of the Chinese Communist Party’s major tactics to influence and manipulate domestic and international perceptions about China, with Chinese social media apps, such as TikTok (or Douyin 抖音) and Xiaohongshu, becoming tools to spread Chinese propaganda and disinformation. With the Chinese communist government controlling access to users’ data and strictly censoring content, these social media platforms, under the guise of entertainment and harmless digital interaction, aim to influence and reshape Taiwanese public opinion on cross-strait relations, as well encourage skepticism toward democratic allies such as the US.
Following a growing number of democratic nations raising alerts and imposing restrictions on Chinese social media, Taiwan in 2022 banned the use of Chinese apps in public-sector devices. However, their users in Taiwan have continued to grow. DataReportal estimated that as of early this year, there were 8.34 million TikTok users in Taiwan. Another report by a Ministry of Digital Affairs unit last year showed that more than one-fifth of Taiwanese adults used TikTok, with young people aged 18 to 29 making up more than 35 percent of the total.
Meanwhile, Xiaohongshu, which attracts young Taiwanese with its focus on beauty and lifestyle, had more than 3 million active users, Data.ai figures showed, with more than 1.27 million Taiwanese downloading the app last year, easily surpassing downloads of Facebook and Instagram.
Furthermore, as China escalates its military drills around Taiwan, a new wave of disinformation is spreading on those Chinese social media platforms. The National Security Bureau has warned that Beijing’s dissemination of misleading or controversial information jumped 60 percent last year from a year earlier, most of which could be found in media outlets frequented by young people.
For example, aerial photographs of Hualien Air Base that circulated on Xiaohongshu on Wednesday last week — a day after President William Lai’s (賴清德) first anniversary in office — have been identified to be post-processed fake “composites” designed to spark concern about intrusions or undetected spying that threaten Taiwanese defense. There has also been a growing number of Chinese streamers showing videos about Taiwan that aim to cause social unrest or even teach Chinese nationals how to illegally enter Taiwan.
For a democratic country, it is definitely a challenge to balance regulating social media and protecting freedom of speech. Aside from banning usage of Chinese social media on public-sector devices, the government has repeatedly urged people who use them to be cautious and alert to being influenced by Beijing’s “united front” propaganda.
More efforts should be made to promote media and information literacy to help the public navigate the complexities of social media and identify misinformation and disinformation. Meta Platforms was recently fined NT$1 million (US$33,412) for failing to disclose ad content creators’ identities and sources of funding under the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act (詐欺犯罪危害防制條例). The government could also work with civil rights groups and media experts to extend the legal scope of digital affairs-related laws to increase the transparency of social media platforms’ operations, and to monitor, moderate and hopefully reduce manipulated information online that undermine Taiwan’s security and sovereignty.
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS