Chinese academic Zhang Weiwei (張維為) recently said that after Taiwan is “unified” with China, “governing Taiwan would be easier than governing Hong Kong” as young Taiwanese are fond of using Chinese social media apps such as Xiaohongshu (小紅書, or “RedNote”). It would be easy to dismiss the Fudan University professor’s remarks as bluster, but it does highlight a worrisome trend — Chinese social media are infiltrating and spreading Beijing’s message and influence in Taiwan.
Cognitive warfare has long been one of the Chinese Communist Party’s major tactics to influence and manipulate domestic and international perceptions about China, with Chinese social media apps, such as TikTok (or Douyin 抖音) and Xiaohongshu, becoming tools to spread Chinese propaganda and disinformation. With the Chinese communist government controlling access to users’ data and strictly censoring content, these social media platforms, under the guise of entertainment and harmless digital interaction, aim to influence and reshape Taiwanese public opinion on cross-strait relations, as well encourage skepticism toward democratic allies such as the US.
Following a growing number of democratic nations raising alerts and imposing restrictions on Chinese social media, Taiwan in 2022 banned the use of Chinese apps in public-sector devices. However, their users in Taiwan have continued to grow. DataReportal estimated that as of early this year, there were 8.34 million TikTok users in Taiwan. Another report by a Ministry of Digital Affairs unit last year showed that more than one-fifth of Taiwanese adults used TikTok, with young people aged 18 to 29 making up more than 35 percent of the total.
Meanwhile, Xiaohongshu, which attracts young Taiwanese with its focus on beauty and lifestyle, had more than 3 million active users, Data.ai figures showed, with more than 1.27 million Taiwanese downloading the app last year, easily surpassing downloads of Facebook and Instagram.
Furthermore, as China escalates its military drills around Taiwan, a new wave of disinformation is spreading on those Chinese social media platforms. The National Security Bureau has warned that Beijing’s dissemination of misleading or controversial information jumped 60 percent last year from a year earlier, most of which could be found in media outlets frequented by young people.
For example, aerial photographs of Hualien Air Base that circulated on Xiaohongshu on Wednesday last week — a day after President William Lai’s (賴清德) first anniversary in office — have been identified to be post-processed fake “composites” designed to spark concern about intrusions or undetected spying that threaten Taiwanese defense. There has also been a growing number of Chinese streamers showing videos about Taiwan that aim to cause social unrest or even teach Chinese nationals how to illegally enter Taiwan.
For a democratic country, it is definitely a challenge to balance regulating social media and protecting freedom of speech. Aside from banning usage of Chinese social media on public-sector devices, the government has repeatedly urged people who use them to be cautious and alert to being influenced by Beijing’s “united front” propaganda.
More efforts should be made to promote media and information literacy to help the public navigate the complexities of social media and identify misinformation and disinformation. Meta Platforms was recently fined NT$1 million (US$33,412) for failing to disclose ad content creators’ identities and sources of funding under the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act (詐欺犯罪危害防制條例). The government could also work with civil rights groups and media experts to extend the legal scope of digital affairs-related laws to increase the transparency of social media platforms’ operations, and to monitor, moderate and hopefully reduce manipulated information online that undermine Taiwan’s security and sovereignty.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
To recalibrate its Cold War alliances, the US adopted its “one China policy,” a diplomatic compromise meant to engage with China and end the Vietnam War, but which left Taiwan in a state of permanent limbo. Half a century later, the costs of that policy are mounting. Taiwan remains a democratic, technologically advanced nation of 23 million people, yet it is denied membership in international organizations and stripped of diplomatic recognition. Meanwhile, the PRC has weaponized the “one China” narrative to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, label the Taiwan Strait as its “internal waters” and threaten international shipping routes that carry more
RSS