Taiwan is widely regarded to be a vibrant democracy in East Asia. However, its think tank ecosystem still has room to grow, especially in terms of strengthening the foundations of democratic resilience.
At the Yushan Forum this year, several speakers, including James Gomez of the Asia Centre and Tristan Liu (呂曜志) of Taiwan Thinktank, said that Taiwan’s think tanks often maintain strong connections with the government, both financially and institutionally. This close relationship might contribute to relatively uniform policy discussions, and limit Taiwan’s flexibility and visibility in international policy communities.
While this arrangement reflects Taiwan’s historical and political context, it also underscores the importance of rethinking how think tanks operate in a democratic society.
Think tanks are not only providers of technical expertise. They help render public opinion more informed and professionally grounded. A robust think tank ecosystem contributes to public discourse, broadens the range of policy options and enhances transparency in governance. The institutional structure and developmental path of think tanks influence the overall quality of democratic governance, not just policy outcomes.
In Taiwan’s case, the need for strong, independent and globally connected think tanks is especially urgent. As authoritarian regimes increasingly engage in disinformation and historical revisionism, Taiwan must be prepared to defend its narratives with clarity and credibility.
For instance, during a May 8 meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized the two countries’ shared stance against “neo-Nazism.” While Taiwan was not named directly, this rhetoric echoes the kind of ideological framing used to justify the invasion of Ukraine, and has appeared over the past few months in Chinese-language disinformation targeting Taiwan.
To strengthen Taiwan’s democratic resilience, the first imperative is to strengthen public recognition and the institutional role of think tanks. Compared with the US, home to one of the most mature think tank ecosystems, with more than 2,200 registered think tanks in 2020, Taiwan’s think tanks are not yet widely seen as central pillars of democratic life. Public awareness of their functions, such as providing expert knowledge to inform policy or amplifying diverse voices, is still relatively limited.
Policymaking remains highly centralized, and think tanks often play a supplementary, rather than formative, role in policy development. Under such conditions, cultivating a robust think tank ecosystem akin to that of the US, which is based on strong demand, is inherently challenging.
To address this, the government could engage more systematically with a wider range of think tanks, including those from civil society, to incorporate their insights into policymaking processes. At the same time, in today’s polarized society, where many commentators argue that the media is a key driver of division, it is also a timely opportunity to strengthen think tanks as trustworthy sources of public knowledge. By increasing their influence and visibility, think tanks can enhance public understanding of their roles and gradually build recognition of their importance in democratic governance.
Second, funding mechanisms and institutional capacity could be improved. As noted by the Taiwan Competitiveness Forum in 2017, unhealthy competition resulting from limited funding channels can compromise research independence. Rather than simply reducing state funding, Taiwan might diversify the types of government-commissioned projects available, making them more open.
Meanwhile, a fair and transparent evaluation system should also be developed to guide funding allocation, not only to reduce alignment incentives between think tanks and government, thereby enhancing their operational independence, but also to signal institutional quality to domestic and international stakeholders.
Third, the government could explore tax incentives, including deductible donations from individuals, or baseline funding to think tanks that meet transparency and performance standards.
It is essential to enhance collaboration among think tanks in democratic countries. While facing narrative challenges, think tanks can offer more flexible and credible platforms than official spokespeople. They could participate in international forums, publish in respected journals, engage foreign media and monitor cognitive operations. Moreover, it is essential to recognize that authoritarianism does not target Taiwan alone, but the broader rules-based international order. In this context, deepening international collaboration is not just desirable, but imperative.
As Taiwan considers the next phase of the New Southbound Policy, think tanks should jointly create strategic frameworks with regional counterparts. This means not only responding to external narratives, but shaping them, offering alternative visions rooted in democratic values and regional solidarity. Such cooperation would help safeguard the resilience of Taiwan and the region’s democratic institutions.
In sum, as global uncertainties intensify, the demand for analysis and recommendations across a wide range of domains, including international relations, defense, economic security and semiconductors, is expected to rise significantly. This trend would likely elevate the visibility and importance of think tanks. Seizing this moment to establish a comprehensive and healthy think tank ecosystem could bring substantial and lasting benefits not only to Taiwan’s democratic resilience, but also to a peaceful and prosperous Indo-Pacific region.
Kuo Ruei is a political worker with experience in international affairs.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Alarm bells over a “hollowing out” of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry and US demands for “protection money” have fueled a panic over Taiwan. To understand how misplaced these fears are, consider the movements of global technology giants. Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) CEO Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) could undoubtedly understand the situation best, and they continue to make key investments in Taiwan. They do not make decisions on a whim. They are the architects of global computing power strategy and possess the highest levels of industry knowledge. No