Taiwan is widely regarded to be a vibrant democracy in East Asia. However, its think tank ecosystem still has room to grow, especially in terms of strengthening the foundations of democratic resilience.
At the Yushan Forum this year, several speakers, including James Gomez of the Asia Centre and Tristan Liu (呂曜志) of Taiwan Thinktank, said that Taiwan’s think tanks often maintain strong connections with the government, both financially and institutionally. This close relationship might contribute to relatively uniform policy discussions, and limit Taiwan’s flexibility and visibility in international policy communities.
While this arrangement reflects Taiwan’s historical and political context, it also underscores the importance of rethinking how think tanks operate in a democratic society.
Think tanks are not only providers of technical expertise. They help render public opinion more informed and professionally grounded. A robust think tank ecosystem contributes to public discourse, broadens the range of policy options and enhances transparency in governance. The institutional structure and developmental path of think tanks influence the overall quality of democratic governance, not just policy outcomes.
In Taiwan’s case, the need for strong, independent and globally connected think tanks is especially urgent. As authoritarian regimes increasingly engage in disinformation and historical revisionism, Taiwan must be prepared to defend its narratives with clarity and credibility.
For instance, during a May 8 meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized the two countries’ shared stance against “neo-Nazism.” While Taiwan was not named directly, this rhetoric echoes the kind of ideological framing used to justify the invasion of Ukraine, and has appeared over the past few months in Chinese-language disinformation targeting Taiwan.
To strengthen Taiwan’s democratic resilience, the first imperative is to strengthen public recognition and the institutional role of think tanks. Compared with the US, home to one of the most mature think tank ecosystems, with more than 2,200 registered think tanks in 2020, Taiwan’s think tanks are not yet widely seen as central pillars of democratic life. Public awareness of their functions, such as providing expert knowledge to inform policy or amplifying diverse voices, is still relatively limited.
Policymaking remains highly centralized, and think tanks often play a supplementary, rather than formative, role in policy development. Under such conditions, cultivating a robust think tank ecosystem akin to that of the US, which is based on strong demand, is inherently challenging.
To address this, the government could engage more systematically with a wider range of think tanks, including those from civil society, to incorporate their insights into policymaking processes. At the same time, in today’s polarized society, where many commentators argue that the media is a key driver of division, it is also a timely opportunity to strengthen think tanks as trustworthy sources of public knowledge. By increasing their influence and visibility, think tanks can enhance public understanding of their roles and gradually build recognition of their importance in democratic governance.
Second, funding mechanisms and institutional capacity could be improved. As noted by the Taiwan Competitiveness Forum in 2017, unhealthy competition resulting from limited funding channels can compromise research independence. Rather than simply reducing state funding, Taiwan might diversify the types of government-commissioned projects available, making them more open.
Meanwhile, a fair and transparent evaluation system should also be developed to guide funding allocation, not only to reduce alignment incentives between think tanks and government, thereby enhancing their operational independence, but also to signal institutional quality to domestic and international stakeholders.
Third, the government could explore tax incentives, including deductible donations from individuals, or baseline funding to think tanks that meet transparency and performance standards.
It is essential to enhance collaboration among think tanks in democratic countries. While facing narrative challenges, think tanks can offer more flexible and credible platforms than official spokespeople. They could participate in international forums, publish in respected journals, engage foreign media and monitor cognitive operations. Moreover, it is essential to recognize that authoritarianism does not target Taiwan alone, but the broader rules-based international order. In this context, deepening international collaboration is not just desirable, but imperative.
As Taiwan considers the next phase of the New Southbound Policy, think tanks should jointly create strategic frameworks with regional counterparts. This means not only responding to external narratives, but shaping them, offering alternative visions rooted in democratic values and regional solidarity. Such cooperation would help safeguard the resilience of Taiwan and the region’s democratic institutions.
In sum, as global uncertainties intensify, the demand for analysis and recommendations across a wide range of domains, including international relations, defense, economic security and semiconductors, is expected to rise significantly. This trend would likely elevate the visibility and importance of think tanks. Seizing this moment to establish a comprehensive and healthy think tank ecosystem could bring substantial and lasting benefits not only to Taiwan’s democratic resilience, but also to a peaceful and prosperous Indo-Pacific region.
Kuo Ruei is a political worker with experience in international affairs.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS