Former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) visit to the UK, within her successful European trip as “Taiwan’s ambassador,” demonstrated the development of relations between the two nations. Last year, British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs David Lammy canceled Tsai’s planned visit to the UK, concerned about angering China in close proximity to his own Beijing trip. This change of course signals progress toward stronger relations between the nations.
Tsai visited the UK Parliament and met with House of Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle. In her address to UK lawmakers, Tsai highlighted two key points: the threats posed by authoritarian regimes to modern democracies, and the collaboration that the UK and Taiwan can rely on to address these challenges.
Tsai underscored that “it is a testing time for democracy around the world,” and that “the health of our democracies depends on our ability to cut off malign influence and ensure that people have access to reliable information environments.” Concerning cooperation to safeguard the current international order, Tsai emphasized her nation’s role, saying: “Taiwan is not only a bastion of democracy, but also a cornerstone for maintaining regional peace and stability.”
Tsai said that the two nations are further developing their ties by exchanging experiences and know-how in confronting disinformation and the manipulation of news implemented by assertive neighbors. Her specific reference was to those “anti-democratic forces” trying to create disunity and shatter the internal cohesion of their respective societies. Within this framework, Taiwan aims to contribute not just to the security of the Indo-Pacific region, but also to the enhancement of the security infrastructure of its Western allies.
One of the topics they might have discussed is collaboration in renewable energy, building on past discussions between the nations. In a meeting last year, the parties discussed energy storage, grid stability, net zero policies, offshore wind power generation and renewable energy development.
On the sidelines of this meeting, the Taiwanese government reiterated that it is looking forward to working with the UK as it strives to advance the country’s second energy transition and achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Building on the Enhanced Trade Partnership Arrangement concluded by the two sides in late 2023, the two nations can deepen their cooperation — bilaterally and multilaterally — to achieve ambitious goals in combating climate change, and specifically regarding net zero emissions.
As Taiwan is prepared to offer assistance in the sector, a tangible opportunity is for the UK to leverage the Taiwanese market, especially in offshore wind energy. Security is another area where the parties’ interests ideally meet. The UK’s actions indeed demonstrate a clear willingness to pursue peace and stability in the South China Sea, mirroring the intentions of its Western partners.
London aims to achieve this objective through freedom of navigation operations, whose primary purpose is to uphold freedom of navigation by countering China’s illegitimate maritime claims. The UK conducted a 16-day freedom of navigation activity in the South China Sea this month. This reflects a clear recognition by the UK of the significance of joint operations in helping to solidify the belief in the urgency of a proactive approach to defending the rules-based international law.
Building on these foundations, the UK and Taiwan can enhance their ties in trade and military affairs to meet their shared interests. Operating within the framework of broader cooperation may then be crucial for more effectively pursuing the main objective of peace and stability in the South China Sea and beyond.
Michele Maresca is an analyst at Il Caffe Geopolitico.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did