UN Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher fears that thousands of babies are at imminent risk of death in Gaza unless aid reaches them. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu fears that foreign politicians could see too many pictures of Palestinian children like these.
Two months after all supplies were cut off, the Israeli government denies the obvious truth: that Gaza is on the brink of famine. However, on Monday night, the prime minister announced that “minimal” aid deliveries would restart, saying his country’s “greatest friends in the world” had told him that they could not “accept images of … mass hunger.”
Netanyahu’s entirely cynical response saw a handful of trucks permitted to cross; reportedly, 100 a day would be allowed — grotesquely inadequate given the vast scale of need. Reaching the most vulnerable would be perilous and difficult anyway amid Israel’s intensified offensive. Netanyahu vowed that Israel would “take control” of all of Gaza.
His words show both that Western allies can shift Israeli behavior — and that they are insufficiently willing to do so. The trickle of supplies is meant to ensure the continuation of a war that enables his political survival, but has killed more than 53,500 Palestinians. That death toll might be a grave underestimate, researchers said.
Foreign leaders are finally stirring as Palestinians starve and the enormity of Israel’s plan sinks in. Britain, France and Canada have described conditions in Gaza as intolerable and threatened further “concrete” actions if Israel’s “egregious” campaign continues and aid restrictions are not lifted. An unrepentant Netanyahu accused them of “offering a huge prize” for the murderous Hamas attack of Oct. 7, 2023, which triggered Israel’s assault.
In a separate statement, 23 countries, including Australia and New Zealand, condemned the aid blockade and military offensive. On Tuesday, the European Commission launched a review of trade ties. Relatives of Israeli hostages have again pressed for a ceasefire and release deal. Outrage has broken through in mainstream domestic politics, with Yair Golan, leader of the Democrats, saying that Israel was “on the path to becoming a pariah state.”
The growing condemnation is spurred not only by the grotesque suffering in Gaza and ministers’ explicit calls for ethnic cleansing, but also by a new distance between Netanyahu and the administration of US President Donald Trump.
Trump did not bother stopping in Israel and repeatedly overrode its interests — on Syria, on the Houthis and on Iran — on his Middle East tour. He has emboldened the Israeli government’s annihilationist approach and would be happy to see a Gaza without Palestinians, but might be tiring of the conflict.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reportedly called Netanyahu three times in 24 hours over the aid blockade. The limited return on his efforts shows that the shift in approach should not be overstated. Striking support for Israel endures in Washington even as other governments — and American voters — think again.
Others must match rhetoric with action. British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs David Lammy condemned the “repellent” words of the extremist Israeli Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich. However, suspending trade talks is barely a start. The same goes for the sanctioning of settler activists: David Cameron has said that as British foreign secretary he wanted to impose sanctions on Smotrich and his colleague Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir last year.
The UK should follow the example of France, which has said it is “determined” to recognize a Palestinian state. Most of all, it should ensure that no arms, including parts for F-35 jets, continue to reach Israel. Until it does so, it will be complicit in these crimes.
The US has the ability to stop the slaughter and achieve a desperately needed ceasefire, but pressure from other allies can make a difference. If they care about saving lives — and not just their own optics — it is time for decisive action.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS