Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies.
Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports.
Denmark has given China a significant anniversary gift: It has decided that Taiwanese are Chinese and should therefore list “China” as their nationality on residency permits.
The decision was cemented at a parliamentary consultation on May 6 and marks a significant change, as Taiwanese nationality had been listed as “Taiwan” since 1978.
In other words, Denmark now considers Taiwan to be part of China, implying that 23 million Taiwanese should be subject to an authoritarian regime that threatens not only Taiwan, but also the surrounding South China Sea region.
Taiwan is a well-functioning democracy with press freedom surpassing that of several EU countries, and it is not just in terms of values that Taiwan is an ally. The EU has, in realpolitik terms, recognized that Taiwan’s technologies and related supply chains are critical and has increased cooperation with the nation over the years.
Taiwan is one of the world’s 25 largest industrial nations. Even Trump maintains close engagement with Taiwan, as have other US presidents.
We live in a time when democracies are under pressure, and this decision touches on fundamental democratic principles. The registration change is a decision made by Denmark’s government, not a technical update, as it wants the rest of us to believe.
That was made clear at the parliamentary consultation, with Danish Minister for Immigration and Integration Kaare Dybvad repeatedly saying that Denmark’s “one China” policy is the reason that Taiwanese in Denmark must list “China” as their nationality on their residency cards, based on advice from the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Now we arrive at a very central point: China is trying to influence countries to adopt its “one China” principle, which claims that Taiwan is part of China. That fundamentally differs from Denmark’s previously pragmatic “one China” policy and the EU’s “one China” policy, which explicitly does not take a position on Taiwan’s status in relation to China. In other words, Denmark has never before misused its “one China” policy to conclude that Taiwan belongs to China, but is now leaning toward Beijing’s position.
There are many conflicts around the world. China’s military posture toward Taiwan is increasingly viewed with concern, and any potential conflict would have economic and technological consequences for the world, including Denmark. Other EU countries have found solutions, but Denmark is choosing to take an indecent position among democracies.
Michael Danielsen is chairman of Taiwan Corner.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS