In his first foreign television interview since taking office, President William Lai (賴清德) issued a sobering warning about the threat China poses to global stability. Speaking with Japanese pop icon Sho Sakurai on his News Zero show, Lai said that Beijing’s ambition to change the rules-based international order begins with its goal of annexing Taiwan. A conflict across the Taiwan Strait would devastate global supply chains, underscoring the urgent need for deterrence and international unity, he said.
The interviewer also caught people’s attention. Sho brought an unconventional, but powerful blend of celebrity and soft power into the Presidential Office. His presence made complex issues — defense readiness, conscription reforms and regional geopolitics — accessible to younger audiences often disengaged from matters of national security.
Beneath the polished broadcast lay a sobering reality: Japan’s concern for Taiwan’s security has never been more visible, vocal or strategic. The evolving partnership between Taiwan and Japan — nations bounded by geography, shared democratic values and a complicated colonial legacy — has always been robust, despite being informal.
Today, that bond is more important than ever.
Taiwan views Japan with deep affinity, a sentiment shaped in part by the legacy of modernization during Japanese colonial rule. Politically, the relationship has sharpened amid rising Chinese aggression. Under former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, Tokyo’s rhetoric shifted dramatically. Abe’s declaration that “a Taiwan emergency is a Japanese emergency” aligned Japan’s security with Taiwan’s stability. Japan’s 2022 National Defense Strategy identified Taiwan as a critical concern, and Tokyo has consistently supported Taipei’s participation in global forums, despite Beijing’s objections.
Why does Japan care so deeply? The answer lies in geography and economics. Taiwan is only 110km from Japan’s southwestern islands. Should conflict erupt, it would likely spill into Japanese territory or airspace. More crucially, Taiwan straddles vital sea lanes — the Taiwan and Luzon straits — through which nearly 80 percent of Japan’s energy imports pass. Any disruption to the maritime arteries could cripple Japan’s economy.
What is striking and troubling is that Japan appears at times more concerned about Taiwan’s security than many in Taiwan itself. While Japan runs TV programs and high-level dialogues on the risks of a Taiwan Strait conflict, some people remain disturbingly disengaged. Pro-China voices continue to operate freely within Taiwanese media and democratic institutions, while civic scrutiny of national security issues often gives way to apathy, partisanship or complacency.
The imbalance is untenable. Taiwan cannot outsource its survival. The burden of defending the nation’s democracy must rest with Taiwanese.
That begins with vigilance at home and abroad. The public must hold lawmakers and civil servants to account. They must challenge pro-China media narratives and reject candidates or institutions that undermine Taiwan’s sovereignty. Civic engagement, public pressure and democratic participation are national security imperatives.
“We have to prepare for war in order to avoid war,” Lai said in the interview.
He emphasized that the development of indigenous uncrewed weapons systems is purely defensive and proposed a cooperation with Japan in the uncrewed vehicle sector, signaling an opportunity for shared innovation and collective security.
Collaboration with Japan reflects a growing alignment between the two democracies. It is a partnership shaped by history, grounded in values and driven by necessity.
As authoritarian pressure intensifies across the Taiwan Strait, Taipei must not let its allies outpace its concern or commitment. Democracy cannot be defended by proxies. It must be protected by its own people.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS