As someone who has closely studied and written about India–Taiwan relations, I have witnessed a quiet, but meaningful transformation in the partnership. What began with the establishment of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) and the India Taipei Association (ITA) in 1995 — modest steps underpinned by mutual caution — has evolved into a more visible and forward-leaning engagement. Thirty years on, this is a milestone that merits not only reflection, but renewed ambition.
Bilateral ties have acquired steady and substantive momentum. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs recently issued a rare and unequivocal statement supporting India’s right to defend its national security, a striking gesture that reflects how Taipei now perceives its relationship with New Delhi. India, too, has extended timely support, following the Hualien train tragedy and amid China’s military posturing after then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi’s 2022 visit.
These expressions of solidarity are not incidental. They reflect a deliberate broadening of engagement, shaped by converging strategic interests and a shared commitment to democratic values, open economies and regional stability. Yet, despite these developments, the India-Taiwan relationship remains conspicuously understudied and underarticulated in both nations’ foreign policy narratives.
In the broader Indo-Pacific context, where economic interdependence, technological competitiveness and geopolitical contestation converge, India and Taiwan are natural partners, but their partnership remains largely ad hoc, without the institutional scaffolding it requires. The 30th anniversary of TECC and ITA should not be treated as a ceremonial marker, but as an inflection point to articulate a bolder vision.
What should this next phase of engagement entail?
First, reconnect the skies. Direct flights between Taipei and New Delhi are long overdue. Governments and airlines alike must look beyond short-term profits to unlock the enormous potential in business, education and people-to-people ties. It is astounding that this simple, yet powerful step remains unrealized.
Second, reinvigorating semi-political dialogue. Parliamentary exchanges, once pursued sporadically, have long remained dormant. Reviving the India-Taiwan Parliamentary Friendship Association could help enhance mutual understanding and reduce political hesitancy. While informal, such initiatives generate momentum in policy spaces where formal diplomacy cannot operate.
Third, institutionalizing cooperation in emerging domains. Cybersecurity, disinformation and advanced technologies are areas where Taiwan has proven capabilities. India, having been subject to increasingly sophisticated cyberintrusions and influence campaigns, would benefit from structured dialogue and knowledge sharing. A dialogue between senior officials from the two foreign ministries could be an effective starting point.
Fourth, deepening collaboration in the semiconductor sector. With the approval of the HCL–Foxconn joint venture, India’s first fabrication unit in Uttar Pradesh, Taiwan’s role in India’s semiconductor ambitions is becoming tangible. However, investment must be paired with long-term planning, including joint training programs, research initiatives and curriculum development to build a skilled workforce.
Fifth, strengthening public awareness and knowledge production. In Taiwan, understanding of India continues to rely heavily on Western media, while in India, Taiwan is still often viewed through the restrictive lens of the “one China policy.” This gap in mutual comprehension is not abstract, I have experienced it personally. During my own academic training, Taiwan was taught not as a vibrant democracy with its own identity and agency, but merely as a China-related issue. It was only through direct engagement and lived experience that I came to understand Taiwan on its own terms.
This underscores why greater academic collaboration is not just desirable, but necessary. Dedicated Taiwan and India studies programs, language exchanges and long-term visiting academic initiatives must be prioritized. Universities in both nations should move beyond symbolic engagement to invest in sustained intellectual partnerships. Only then can we cultivate a new generation of academics, diplomats and practitioners who see each other not through borrowed narratives, but through informed, grounded perspectives.
India and Taiwan are powers navigating a region marked by increasing volatility. They face assertive neighbors, economic coercion and the constant threat of strategic escalation. Unlike other regional actors, they have no diplomatic buffer or “exit” from these tensions; they must contend directly with the China challenge. In this context, silence or inertia is no longer a viable policy choice.
The 30th anniversary of TECC and ITA is not just a moment to commemorate; it is a strategic opportunity to reimagine the future of India-Taiwan relations. This requires more than cautious optimism. It demands policy clarity, public articulation and a proactive road map for cooperation across sectors.
India-Taiwan ties have come a long way, but the path ahead remains open. Whether this anniversary becomes a turning point or a missed opportunity would depend on the choices both sides are willing to make now.
Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS