As someone who has closely studied and written about India–Taiwan relations, I have witnessed a quiet, but meaningful transformation in the partnership. What began with the establishment of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) and the India Taipei Association (ITA) in 1995 — modest steps underpinned by mutual caution — has evolved into a more visible and forward-leaning engagement. Thirty years on, this is a milestone that merits not only reflection, but renewed ambition.
Bilateral ties have acquired steady and substantive momentum. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs recently issued a rare and unequivocal statement supporting India’s right to defend its national security, a striking gesture that reflects how Taipei now perceives its relationship with New Delhi. India, too, has extended timely support, following the Hualien train tragedy and amid China’s military posturing after then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi’s 2022 visit.
These expressions of solidarity are not incidental. They reflect a deliberate broadening of engagement, shaped by converging strategic interests and a shared commitment to democratic values, open economies and regional stability. Yet, despite these developments, the India-Taiwan relationship remains conspicuously understudied and underarticulated in both nations’ foreign policy narratives.
In the broader Indo-Pacific context, where economic interdependence, technological competitiveness and geopolitical contestation converge, India and Taiwan are natural partners, but their partnership remains largely ad hoc, without the institutional scaffolding it requires. The 30th anniversary of TECC and ITA should not be treated as a ceremonial marker, but as an inflection point to articulate a bolder vision.
What should this next phase of engagement entail?
First, reconnect the skies. Direct flights between Taipei and New Delhi are long overdue. Governments and airlines alike must look beyond short-term profits to unlock the enormous potential in business, education and people-to-people ties. It is astounding that this simple, yet powerful step remains unrealized.
Second, reinvigorating semi-political dialogue. Parliamentary exchanges, once pursued sporadically, have long remained dormant. Reviving the India-Taiwan Parliamentary Friendship Association could help enhance mutual understanding and reduce political hesitancy. While informal, such initiatives generate momentum in policy spaces where formal diplomacy cannot operate.
Third, institutionalizing cooperation in emerging domains. Cybersecurity, disinformation and advanced technologies are areas where Taiwan has proven capabilities. India, having been subject to increasingly sophisticated cyberintrusions and influence campaigns, would benefit from structured dialogue and knowledge sharing. A dialogue between senior officials from the two foreign ministries could be an effective starting point.
Fourth, deepening collaboration in the semiconductor sector. With the approval of the HCL–Foxconn joint venture, India’s first fabrication unit in Uttar Pradesh, Taiwan’s role in India’s semiconductor ambitions is becoming tangible. However, investment must be paired with long-term planning, including joint training programs, research initiatives and curriculum development to build a skilled workforce.
Fifth, strengthening public awareness and knowledge production. In Taiwan, understanding of India continues to rely heavily on Western media, while in India, Taiwan is still often viewed through the restrictive lens of the “one China policy.” This gap in mutual comprehension is not abstract, I have experienced it personally. During my own academic training, Taiwan was taught not as a vibrant democracy with its own identity and agency, but merely as a China-related issue. It was only through direct engagement and lived experience that I came to understand Taiwan on its own terms.
This underscores why greater academic collaboration is not just desirable, but necessary. Dedicated Taiwan and India studies programs, language exchanges and long-term visiting academic initiatives must be prioritized. Universities in both nations should move beyond symbolic engagement to invest in sustained intellectual partnerships. Only then can we cultivate a new generation of academics, diplomats and practitioners who see each other not through borrowed narratives, but through informed, grounded perspectives.
India and Taiwan are powers navigating a region marked by increasing volatility. They face assertive neighbors, economic coercion and the constant threat of strategic escalation. Unlike other regional actors, they have no diplomatic buffer or “exit” from these tensions; they must contend directly with the China challenge. In this context, silence or inertia is no longer a viable policy choice.
The 30th anniversary of TECC and ITA is not just a moment to commemorate; it is a strategic opportunity to reimagine the future of India-Taiwan relations. This requires more than cautious optimism. It demands policy clarity, public articulation and a proactive road map for cooperation across sectors.
India-Taiwan ties have come a long way, but the path ahead remains open. Whether this anniversary becomes a turning point or a missed opportunity would depend on the choices both sides are willing to make now.
Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS