Members of commercial drivers’ groups on Monday protested against a proposal to increase fines for motorists who fail to yield to pedestrians at designated crossings.
The protesters also called for an increase in fines for pedestrians who engage in dangerous behavior, such as crossing intersections on a red light.
National Automobile Driver’s Rights Alliance president Liu Hong-chang (劉鴻樟) said that fines for dangerous pedestrian behavior should be the same as those for motorists who engage in illegal behavior. He also suggested that police be deployed at intersections to enforce rules, and that traffic signals should be redesigned to better separate vehicle and pedestrian flow to improve overall safety.
While Liu is correct that pedestrians should be better deterred from engaging in dangerous behavior, arguably the focus on pedestrian safety is due to pedestrians being more at risk than that of motorists when passing through intersections.
However, while the frequency of traffic accidents in Taiwan is relatively high, the rate of fatal accidents involving pedestrians is lower than that in other developed nations — despite pedestrian safety in Taiwan being a widely publicized topic following an op-ed on the subject by CNN in 2022.
For example, in the US there were 40,000 fatal traffic accidents involving pedestrians last year, representing 0.12 percent of the US population. In contrast, there were 366 fatal accidents involving pedestrians in Taiwan last year, representing only 0.0016 percent of the population.
Perhaps the reason for the disparity is that pedestrians in Taiwan have learned to act defensively, often waiting for there to be no cars before attempting to cross the road at intersections without traffic lights — despite the law saying that pedestrians have the right of way.
Nevertheless, most of the fatal traffic accidents in Taiwan are preventable and action should be taken to ensure that pedestrians are not taking a gamble crossing the street. The question is whether that could be achieved through higher fines.
Statistics show that the majority of fatal accidents involving pedestrians occur at intersections and are generally caused by driver negligence, speeding, impaired driving, distracted driving (often due to mobile phone use), unsafe road conditions or poor visibility. Most of those are examples of dangerous driving habits, which high fines, coupled with aggressive enforcement, could potentially deter. However, another major cause of accidents is a general disregard for pedestrian rights. Online discussions on the issue often degrade into criticism of pedestrians, with many drivers saying that pedestrians are being “spoiled.”
Given this situation, the measure most urgently needed is driver education. The US, Canada and European nations offer driver safety courses at high-school level. Taiwan could do so too, and introduce graduated driving, gradually reducing driving restrictions following a series of tests.
Other potential measures include separate lights at intersections for pedestrians and motorists, as suggested by Liu, as well as frequent patrols by traffic police. Better enforcement is especially needed at intersections where motorists frequently cut through a turn diagonally in an attempt to beat oncoming traffic.
This habit is illegal, and is dangerous for both pedestrians and drivers of oncoming vehicles. Such behavior can be mitigated by using concrete barriers on both sides of crosswalks. Pedestrian crossings could also be made safer by installing elevated or underground footways at the most dangerous intersections.
While fines might be effective in deterring some behavior that leads to fatal traffic accidents, the best measures would be improved driver education, better enforcement, and the installation of pedestrian-safety lights, barriers and walkways.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS