Members of commercial drivers’ groups on Monday protested against a proposal to increase fines for motorists who fail to yield to pedestrians at designated crossings.
The protesters also called for an increase in fines for pedestrians who engage in dangerous behavior, such as crossing intersections on a red light.
National Automobile Driver’s Rights Alliance president Liu Hong-chang (劉鴻樟) said that fines for dangerous pedestrian behavior should be the same as those for motorists who engage in illegal behavior. He also suggested that police be deployed at intersections to enforce rules, and that traffic signals should be redesigned to better separate vehicle and pedestrian flow to improve overall safety.
While Liu is correct that pedestrians should be better deterred from engaging in dangerous behavior, arguably the focus on pedestrian safety is due to pedestrians being more at risk than that of motorists when passing through intersections.
However, while the frequency of traffic accidents in Taiwan is relatively high, the rate of fatal accidents involving pedestrians is lower than that in other developed nations — despite pedestrian safety in Taiwan being a widely publicized topic following an op-ed on the subject by CNN in 2022.
For example, in the US there were 40,000 fatal traffic accidents involving pedestrians last year, representing 0.12 percent of the US population. In contrast, there were 366 fatal accidents involving pedestrians in Taiwan last year, representing only 0.0016 percent of the population.
Perhaps the reason for the disparity is that pedestrians in Taiwan have learned to act defensively, often waiting for there to be no cars before attempting to cross the road at intersections without traffic lights — despite the law saying that pedestrians have the right of way.
Nevertheless, most of the fatal traffic accidents in Taiwan are preventable and action should be taken to ensure that pedestrians are not taking a gamble crossing the street. The question is whether that could be achieved through higher fines.
Statistics show that the majority of fatal accidents involving pedestrians occur at intersections and are generally caused by driver negligence, speeding, impaired driving, distracted driving (often due to mobile phone use), unsafe road conditions or poor visibility. Most of those are examples of dangerous driving habits, which high fines, coupled with aggressive enforcement, could potentially deter. However, another major cause of accidents is a general disregard for pedestrian rights. Online discussions on the issue often degrade into criticism of pedestrians, with many drivers saying that pedestrians are being “spoiled.”
Given this situation, the measure most urgently needed is driver education. The US, Canada and European nations offer driver safety courses at high-school level. Taiwan could do so too, and introduce graduated driving, gradually reducing driving restrictions following a series of tests.
Other potential measures include separate lights at intersections for pedestrians and motorists, as suggested by Liu, as well as frequent patrols by traffic police. Better enforcement is especially needed at intersections where motorists frequently cut through a turn diagonally in an attempt to beat oncoming traffic.
This habit is illegal, and is dangerous for both pedestrians and drivers of oncoming vehicles. Such behavior can be mitigated by using concrete barriers on both sides of crosswalks. Pedestrian crossings could also be made safer by installing elevated or underground footways at the most dangerous intersections.
While fines might be effective in deterring some behavior that leads to fatal traffic accidents, the best measures would be improved driver education, better enforcement, and the installation of pedestrian-safety lights, barriers and walkways.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS