Following the widely celebrated visit of Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) and the company’s surge in market capitalization, Taiwan has plunged into a fervent wave of adulation. Government officials, industry leaders, and academics have lined up to pay tribute, and media outlets cannot seem to lavish sufficient praise in their breathless coverage. There is an uneasy question beneath this frenzy: Are we mistaking the shovel vendor for the one who knows where the gold is?
Taiwan has earned its reputation as an efficient node in the global tech supply chain. Firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) that have supported global growth with their foundry capacity and processing innovation are revered as “national protectors” and part of the “silicon shield.” With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) as a new frontier in technological progress, Taiwanese seem eager to repeat their past industrial success with a new technological emblem.
On the surface, Nvidia seems to fit the bill: It is led by a charismatic, forward-looking, Mandarin-speaking executive, and it relies on TSMC to support its efforts to meet global demand for AI infrastructure. However, a closer look shows that Nvidia is not in a position to define the future of AI, it is only one step in the computation acceleration process.
The true architects of artificial general intelligence (AGI) are OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic and similar entities. They are the ones designing the learning architectures, curating the training data, calibrating inference mechanisms and creating ethical boundaries. While indispensable, the GPU remains a means to an end, not the conceptually innovative source.
This raises important questions. In our motivation to sustain Taiwan’s dominant role in the hardware supply chain, are we abandoning all claims of ownership for core intelligence technologies?
Are we devoting so much effort to hardware production that we are forfeiting the opportunity to shape AGI architectures, narratives and ethical frameworks?
To be clear, Huang deserves enormous respect for his strategic timing efforts and supply chain mastery, but to accept his vision as a guiding roadmap for Taiwan’s trajectory risks conflating production capacity with knowledge agency. Our continuing global influence would not be determined solely by meeting the computational requirements of technological superpowers, but by articulating a vision of what intelligence should become, and how it should serve society.
Taiwan needs to make a strong commitment to foundational research, including indigenous model design and culturally grounded computational architectures.
If we fail to make the necessary investment, we might find ourselves idolizing the shovel vendors instead of building the future that our tools are meant to create.
Huang Chung-yuan is a professor in the Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Department of Artificial Intelligence and the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at Chang Gung University.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS