Following the widely celebrated visit of Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) and the company’s surge in market capitalization, Taiwan has plunged into a fervent wave of adulation. Government officials, industry leaders, and academics have lined up to pay tribute, and media outlets cannot seem to lavish sufficient praise in their breathless coverage. There is an uneasy question beneath this frenzy: Are we mistaking the shovel vendor for the one who knows where the gold is?
Taiwan has earned its reputation as an efficient node in the global tech supply chain. Firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) that have supported global growth with their foundry capacity and processing innovation are revered as “national protectors” and part of the “silicon shield.” With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) as a new frontier in technological progress, Taiwanese seem eager to repeat their past industrial success with a new technological emblem.
On the surface, Nvidia seems to fit the bill: It is led by a charismatic, forward-looking, Mandarin-speaking executive, and it relies on TSMC to support its efforts to meet global demand for AI infrastructure. However, a closer look shows that Nvidia is not in a position to define the future of AI, it is only one step in the computation acceleration process.
The true architects of artificial general intelligence (AGI) are OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic and similar entities. They are the ones designing the learning architectures, curating the training data, calibrating inference mechanisms and creating ethical boundaries. While indispensable, the GPU remains a means to an end, not the conceptually innovative source.
This raises important questions. In our motivation to sustain Taiwan’s dominant role in the hardware supply chain, are we abandoning all claims of ownership for core intelligence technologies?
Are we devoting so much effort to hardware production that we are forfeiting the opportunity to shape AGI architectures, narratives and ethical frameworks?
To be clear, Huang deserves enormous respect for his strategic timing efforts and supply chain mastery, but to accept his vision as a guiding roadmap for Taiwan’s trajectory risks conflating production capacity with knowledge agency. Our continuing global influence would not be determined solely by meeting the computational requirements of technological superpowers, but by articulating a vision of what intelligence should become, and how it should serve society.
Taiwan needs to make a strong commitment to foundational research, including indigenous model design and culturally grounded computational architectures.
If we fail to make the necessary investment, we might find ourselves idolizing the shovel vendors instead of building the future that our tools are meant to create.
Huang Chung-yuan is a professor in the Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Department of Artificial Intelligence and the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at Chang Gung University.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS