Following the widely celebrated visit of Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) and the company’s surge in market capitalization, Taiwan has plunged into a fervent wave of adulation. Government officials, industry leaders, and academics have lined up to pay tribute, and media outlets cannot seem to lavish sufficient praise in their breathless coverage. There is an uneasy question beneath this frenzy: Are we mistaking the shovel vendor for the one who knows where the gold is?
Taiwan has earned its reputation as an efficient node in the global tech supply chain. Firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) that have supported global growth with their foundry capacity and processing innovation are revered as “national protectors” and part of the “silicon shield.” With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) as a new frontier in technological progress, Taiwanese seem eager to repeat their past industrial success with a new technological emblem.
On the surface, Nvidia seems to fit the bill: It is led by a charismatic, forward-looking, Mandarin-speaking executive, and it relies on TSMC to support its efforts to meet global demand for AI infrastructure. However, a closer look shows that Nvidia is not in a position to define the future of AI, it is only one step in the computation acceleration process.
The true architects of artificial general intelligence (AGI) are OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic and similar entities. They are the ones designing the learning architectures, curating the training data, calibrating inference mechanisms and creating ethical boundaries. While indispensable, the GPU remains a means to an end, not the conceptually innovative source.
This raises important questions. In our motivation to sustain Taiwan’s dominant role in the hardware supply chain, are we abandoning all claims of ownership for core intelligence technologies?
Are we devoting so much effort to hardware production that we are forfeiting the opportunity to shape AGI architectures, narratives and ethical frameworks?
To be clear, Huang deserves enormous respect for his strategic timing efforts and supply chain mastery, but to accept his vision as a guiding roadmap for Taiwan’s trajectory risks conflating production capacity with knowledge agency. Our continuing global influence would not be determined solely by meeting the computational requirements of technological superpowers, but by articulating a vision of what intelligence should become, and how it should serve society.
Taiwan needs to make a strong commitment to foundational research, including indigenous model design and culturally grounded computational architectures.
If we fail to make the necessary investment, we might find ourselves idolizing the shovel vendors instead of building the future that our tools are meant to create.
Huang Chung-yuan is a professor in the Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Department of Artificial Intelligence and the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at Chang Gung University.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS