At a critical moment in the US-China confrontation, Nikkei Asia took a bold leap — visiting Taiwan to conduct an interview with President William Lai (賴清德), and publishing a rare and extensive report on Tuesday. Other than to echo Lai’s policy of staying firmly rooted in Taiwan, and expanding global presence and marketing worldwide, this interview served two main purposes.
The first is one domestic in nature. Nikkei Asia aims to align with the strong sentiment among the Japanese public of supporting Taiwan and remaining suspicious of China. Interviewing Lai, Taiwan’s pro-Japan president, could help to build a bipartisan consensus in Japan to support Taiwan — something that could help boost the low approval ratings of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s Cabinet. It also allows Japan to better understand and accommodate Taiwan’s urgent needs, thereby fostering an atmosphere of a shared purpose and laying the foundation for deeper cooperation between the two countries in the future.
The second purpose is diplomatic. By providing Lai with a platform, Japanese media indirectly expressed a message to the US and the rest of the world: Japan and Taiwan share a common destiny.
As the US-Japan alliance strengthens its policies and cooperation with regard to Taiwan, this move could lead to further substantive cooperation between Taiwan, Japan and the US.
This unprecedented interview not only highlighted Japan’s strong recognition of Lai’s political stance and international role, but also garnered significant global attention. In the interview, Lai made several clear-cut statements on Taiwan-Japan relations, US-Taiwan relations, US-China rivalry and the Taiwan-China situation.
Behind this interview was a strong political intent. It was more than just an interview — it was a diplomatic and strategic signal between Taiwan and Japan. It reflects the comprehensive deepening of the two countries’ relationship, further highlighting Taiwan’s indispensable and central role in Indo-Pacific strategy.
With the Japanese media as his conduit, Lai also took advantage of the opportunity to promote Taiwan’s plans to leverage its production and manufacturing capabilities to establish a “non-red” global semiconductor supply chain partnership for democratic countries. Given Taiwan’s sheer strength in the global semiconductor industry, there is every reason to believe that such a vision would be realized.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan, and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS