At a critical moment in the US-China confrontation, Nikkei Asia took a bold leap — visiting Taiwan to conduct an interview with President William Lai (賴清德), and publishing a rare and extensive report on Tuesday. Other than to echo Lai’s policy of staying firmly rooted in Taiwan, and expanding global presence and marketing worldwide, this interview served two main purposes.
The first is one domestic in nature. Nikkei Asia aims to align with the strong sentiment among the Japanese public of supporting Taiwan and remaining suspicious of China. Interviewing Lai, Taiwan’s pro-Japan president, could help to build a bipartisan consensus in Japan to support Taiwan — something that could help boost the low approval ratings of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s Cabinet. It also allows Japan to better understand and accommodate Taiwan’s urgent needs, thereby fostering an atmosphere of a shared purpose and laying the foundation for deeper cooperation between the two countries in the future.
The second purpose is diplomatic. By providing Lai with a platform, Japanese media indirectly expressed a message to the US and the rest of the world: Japan and Taiwan share a common destiny.
As the US-Japan alliance strengthens its policies and cooperation with regard to Taiwan, this move could lead to further substantive cooperation between Taiwan, Japan and the US.
This unprecedented interview not only highlighted Japan’s strong recognition of Lai’s political stance and international role, but also garnered significant global attention. In the interview, Lai made several clear-cut statements on Taiwan-Japan relations, US-Taiwan relations, US-China rivalry and the Taiwan-China situation.
Behind this interview was a strong political intent. It was more than just an interview — it was a diplomatic and strategic signal between Taiwan and Japan. It reflects the comprehensive deepening of the two countries’ relationship, further highlighting Taiwan’s indispensable and central role in Indo-Pacific strategy.
With the Japanese media as his conduit, Lai also took advantage of the opportunity to promote Taiwan’s plans to leverage its production and manufacturing capabilities to establish a “non-red” global semiconductor supply chain partnership for democratic countries. Given Taiwan’s sheer strength in the global semiconductor industry, there is every reason to believe that such a vision would be realized.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan, and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS