The government is to loosen regulations and offer career-counseling and language-training services to encourage international students to stay in Taiwan for work, a Ministry of Education official said on May 9.
Under a new program called “Intense 2+2,” international students would also be eligible for full scholarships to pursue master’s degrees in Taiwan, Deputy Minister of Education Yeh Ping-cheng (葉丙成) said, adding that new services for eligible students would include internship matching, Mandarin-language courses, vocational training and employment workshops.
The program is meant to introduce foreign talent into Taiwan’s science, technology, engineering, mathematics, semiconductor and finance sectors.
The announcement came two months after the Ministry of Labor on March 20 said it would propose regulations to expand the jobs available for foreign students in Taiwan upon graduation.
The proposed amendments would change regulations on employment qualifications, skill requirements, and regulations on changing employers, the Central News Agency wrote, adding that Taiwan’s industries face a shortfall of 400,000 workers by 2030.
The amendments proposed by the ministries would eliminate some bureaucratic barriers for foreign students considering working in Taiwan following graduation, but what would be more important to such a consideration would be whether Taiwan’s industries could offer an attractive work environment.
Wages in Taiwan are significantly better than those in most of Southeast Asia — which might make it attractive to students from some countries — but tech jobs in Taiwan pay much less on average than those in the US. The average annual tech sector salary in Taiwan is roughly NT$800,000 (US$26,515), while the average in California is roughly US$65,000. Of course, the cost of living in California is higher, but financial considerations are only part of the equation.
Silicon Valley has the densest concentration of tech companies, much of the world’s top industry talent, a strong ecosystem for start-ups and abundant venture capital. Those things would be very important to many people starting a career in tech who would want to network with others in the industry.
For someone less interested in networking or entrepreneurship, Japan offers another attractive alternative to Taiwan, and Japan is facing a massive shortage of programmers and other IT workers amid an industry boom. Many tech jobs there do not even require Japanese-language skills.
Taiwan arguably has the competitive edge when it comes to jobs in semiconductors, given its strengths in the sector. Those interested in chip design, particularly chips intended for use with artificial intelligence (AI) applications, would find a supportive research environment in Taiwan, given the government’s growing focus on this area. President William Lai (賴清德) has said on numerous occasions that he plans to turn Taiwan into an “AI island,” and in March the Ministry of Digital Affairs launched the Enhanced AI Investment Startup Program, investing NT$10 billion from the National Development Fund to support unlisted AI start-ups.
While Taiwan might struggle to attract or retain talent in engineering or finance, given its lack of global prominence in these sectors, it might have success in keeping mathematics talent. Taiwanese tend to perform well in mathematics, and there are 124 universities nationwide, as well as the Academia Sinica, offering plenty of opportunities. The need for those researchers would grow alongside growth in Taiwan’s semiconductor and AI sectors.
In its efforts to encourage international students to develop their careers in Taiwan, the government should capitalize on Taiwan’s strengths. It would also be of benefit to bolster collaborations with international firms and research institutions, providing greater networking opportunities for those who want to stay and work. Such exchanges would facilitate the advancement of research, benefiting all parties involved, while making Taiwan a more attractive place to work.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of