Sexually discriminatory and demeaning content was included in a health education question for a midterm exam for ninth-grade students at Jincheng Junior High School in Kinmen County.
Were there no guardrails in place to prevent the inclusion of inappropriate questions in an exam for students? Why is it that the school authorities only discovered the seriousness of the issue when it was reported by parents?
Examination questions are generally provided by teachers on a rotational basis, and according to regulations, the questions would have to be vetted by another teacher specializing in the same field. If any queries had been raised in the case, were they adequately followed up? Were the test questions found to be inappropriate? Were any recommendations for revision offered? If so, did the teacher who formulated the questions take any notice?
The whole process needs to be investigated, step by step. In schools nowadays, responsibility and accountability have been transferred from administrative guidelines to a collegiate system with more autonomy given to teachers. Many academic decisions, including teacher selection, have been moved from the authority of school principals and directors to teachers and teacher groups.
Given this, who should be held accountable for this examination question fiasco? Is there a disciplinary mechanism in place for the teachers’ groups? Experience shows that colleagues tend to close ranks when something major occurs.
Responsible teachers who have been given a high degree of autonomy also need to show professionalism and keep each other in line, as well as offer encouragement. Administrators should also be given the authority to regulate the system and step in when needed.
If not, it would be difficult to meet the expectations of students and parents, and to provide an environment conducive to learning.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior-High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Paul Cooper
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework