Sexually discriminatory and demeaning content was included in a health education question for a midterm exam for ninth-grade students at Jincheng Junior High School in Kinmen County.
Were there no guardrails in place to prevent the inclusion of inappropriate questions in an exam for students? Why is it that the school authorities only discovered the seriousness of the issue when it was reported by parents?
Examination questions are generally provided by teachers on a rotational basis, and according to regulations, the questions would have to be vetted by another teacher specializing in the same field. If any queries had been raised in the case, were they adequately followed up? Were the test questions found to be inappropriate? Were any recommendations for revision offered? If so, did the teacher who formulated the questions take any notice?
The whole process needs to be investigated, step by step. In schools nowadays, responsibility and accountability have been transferred from administrative guidelines to a collegiate system with more autonomy given to teachers. Many academic decisions, including teacher selection, have been moved from the authority of school principals and directors to teachers and teacher groups.
Given this, who should be held accountable for this examination question fiasco? Is there a disciplinary mechanism in place for the teachers’ groups? Experience shows that colleagues tend to close ranks when something major occurs.
Responsible teachers who have been given a high degree of autonomy also need to show professionalism and keep each other in line, as well as offer encouragement. Administrators should also be given the authority to regulate the system and step in when needed.
If not, it would be difficult to meet the expectations of students and parents, and to provide an environment conducive to learning.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior-High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Paul Cooper
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS