Sexually discriminatory and demeaning content was included in a health education question for a midterm exam for ninth-grade students at Jincheng Junior High School in Kinmen County.
Were there no guardrails in place to prevent the inclusion of inappropriate questions in an exam for students? Why is it that the school authorities only discovered the seriousness of the issue when it was reported by parents?
Examination questions are generally provided by teachers on a rotational basis, and according to regulations, the questions would have to be vetted by another teacher specializing in the same field. If any queries had been raised in the case, were they adequately followed up? Were the test questions found to be inappropriate? Were any recommendations for revision offered? If so, did the teacher who formulated the questions take any notice?
The whole process needs to be investigated, step by step. In schools nowadays, responsibility and accountability have been transferred from administrative guidelines to a collegiate system with more autonomy given to teachers. Many academic decisions, including teacher selection, have been moved from the authority of school principals and directors to teachers and teacher groups.
Given this, who should be held accountable for this examination question fiasco? Is there a disciplinary mechanism in place for the teachers’ groups? Experience shows that colleagues tend to close ranks when something major occurs.
Responsible teachers who have been given a high degree of autonomy also need to show professionalism and keep each other in line, as well as offer encouragement. Administrators should also be given the authority to regulate the system and step in when needed.
If not, it would be difficult to meet the expectations of students and parents, and to provide an environment conducive to learning.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior-High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS