Sexually discriminatory and demeaning content was included in a health education question for a midterm exam for ninth-grade students at Jincheng Junior High School in Kinmen County.
Were there no guardrails in place to prevent the inclusion of inappropriate questions in an exam for students? Why is it that the school authorities only discovered the seriousness of the issue when it was reported by parents?
Examination questions are generally provided by teachers on a rotational basis, and according to regulations, the questions would have to be vetted by another teacher specializing in the same field. If any queries had been raised in the case, were they adequately followed up? Were the test questions found to be inappropriate? Were any recommendations for revision offered? If so, did the teacher who formulated the questions take any notice?
The whole process needs to be investigated, step by step. In schools nowadays, responsibility and accountability have been transferred from administrative guidelines to a collegiate system with more autonomy given to teachers. Many academic decisions, including teacher selection, have been moved from the authority of school principals and directors to teachers and teacher groups.
Given this, who should be held accountable for this examination question fiasco? Is there a disciplinary mechanism in place for the teachers’ groups? Experience shows that colleagues tend to close ranks when something major occurs.
Responsible teachers who have been given a high degree of autonomy also need to show professionalism and keep each other in line, as well as offer encouragement. Administrators should also be given the authority to regulate the system and step in when needed.
If not, it would be difficult to meet the expectations of students and parents, and to provide an environment conducive to learning.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior-High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Paul Cooper
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS