The central bank might be facing growing pressure from Washington to address Taiwan’s large trade surplus with the US, but a repeat of the sharp appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar as seen in 1985, following the coordinated currency intervention by the US, Japan, Germany, France and the UK under the Plaza Accord, appears unlikely.
This is because the central bank’s primary responsibility is to safeguard the nation’s economic growth and financial stability. A rapid surge in the local currency would dampen the earnings of exporters, particularly in the electronics sector, which remains a major pillar of Taiwan’s economy. In addition, as the liberalization of global capital markets since 2000 has significantly increased currency trading volumes and cross-border capital flows, large-scale interventions in foreign exchange markets are more difficult to execute effectively today.
Still, the recent sharp appreciation of the NT dollar against the US dollar draws uneasy parallels with Japan’s experience in the mid-1980s. The dramatic revaluation of the yen, alongside other structural factors, contributed to Japan’s prolonged economic stagnation. The ripple effect spread to Asian foreign exchange markets, causing sharp appreciations in many regional currencies, including the NT dollar. The steep increases eroded local exporters’ competitiveness and led to widespread factory closures and layoffs in Taiwan, the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research said. However, Taiwan’s export landscape has shifted significantly in recent decades, with electronics manufacturers replacing textile firms as the nation’s major exporters and occupying a stronger position in global supply chains.
A strong NT dollar remains a headwind for local exporters, sparking concerns that Taiwan might follow a trajectory similar to Japan’s, especially as the local currency’s sharp appreciation coincided with the conclusion of the initial trade talks between Taiwan and US earlier this month. On May 2, just one day after the talks ended, the NT dollar surged nearly 3 percent to NT$31.064 against the US dollar.
Central bank Governor Yang Chin-long (楊金龍) has denied speculation that Taiwan was under pressure from the US Department of the Treasury to revalue the NT dollar, as part of a broader effort to trim the nation’s trade surplus with the US, help reduce a proposed 32 percent “reciprocal” tariff on imports from Taiwan and ahead of the US Treasury’s release of its latest report on the foreign exchange policies of its major trading partners (Taiwan was included on the US’ currency monitoring list last year).
Yang attributed the NT dollar’s sharp appreciation to market dynamics — including speculative sentiment, exporter sales of US dollars and strong net buying of local equities by foreign investors. He added that the central bank stepped into the foreign exchange market to curb abnormal fluctuations in the NT dollar, rather than allowing the currency’s rise to proceed unchecked, as some media reported.
The NT dollar yesterday fell for a sixth straight session, closing at NT$30.455 against the greenback. Despite the recent pullback, the local currency has appreciated 7.34 percent since the start of the year, from NT$32.868 on Jan. 2.
Given the inherently unpredictable nature of foreign exchange markets, the central bank should adopt measures to support local businesses to navigate the volatility of the NT dollar against the greenback. In addition, government agencies should be ready with supportive measures for sectors most vulnerable to foreign exchange volatility, such as manufacturers of machine tools, textiles and chemicals, given their smaller operational scale and limited market exposure.
Regardless of the uncertainty of the external environment, minimizing the impact of currency fluctuations should remain a key priority for policymakers.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS