US President Donald Trump’s administration is considering rescinding the previous administration’s restrictions on artificial intelligence (AI) chip exports, which were set to take effect on Thursday.
The White House said that sorting countries into three tiers subject to specific AI-related trade regulations is too complex and unenforceable, international media reported. The Trump administration is working toward new regulations to keep advanced AI technology out of the hands of foreign adversaries.
While the exact timetable for the new rules is unknown, the latest development boosted US technology stocks last week, as investors welcomed the US government’s recognition that reasonable regulations are needed to sustain growth and innovation in the tech sector. The move is also likely to have implications for Taiwan’s semiconductor and electronics industries.
Another issue worthy of close attention is the US government’s decision on whether to impose steep tariffs on imported semiconductors, following the closure on Wednesday last week of the comment window for Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act investigation into semiconductor imports.
The Trump administration might announce semiconductor tariffs soon based on the results of the probe, with some suggesting Washington could impose tariffs of between 25 percent and 100 percent on chip imports.
Although US Customs and Border Protection on April 11 included products such as smartphones, PCs, servers, chipmaking equipment and other consumer electronics on a list that would be exempted from the US’ latest round of tariffs, such products would likely be included in the potential semiconductor tariffs, international media reported, citing Trump officials.
In other words, when the US government announces its new semiconductor trade ruling, it might also clarify whether such tech products would retain their exemption status or be reclassified under a different tariff category.
As Trump’s trade policies unfold, the US government’s talks with major trading partners continue to weigh on market sentiment. Taiwan has made progress in trade negotiations with the US, but at the same time, the New Taiwan dollar has continued to fluctuate against the US dollar.
Although the government has strongly denied that the NT dollar’s exchange rates were part of trade negotiations, worries over tariffs and the local currency’s rapid appreciation have dominated headlines across multiple news outlets over the past week.
The push to finalize Trump’s tax reform package and his goal of reducing the US’ trade deficit is beginning to take shape, with the White House rushing to reach trade deals with multiple countries. This would likely spur market speculation over rising exchange rates in counterpart economies — and inevitably the strengthening of the NT dollar.
However, none has been appreciating as much as the NT dollar, which has exhibited more volatility than ever before, putting greater pressure on export-oriented businesses from electronics to semiconductors and traditional industries.
It remains unclear whether the Trump administration’s trade deals could lead to a meaningful reduction in tariffs, but one thing that is certain is that the US president’s aggressive tariff moves have rattled investors’ confidence in the US dollar and cast uncertainty over the appeal of US assets.
Against this backdrop, Taiwanese investors and exporters should think seriously about hedging, if not reducing, their exposure to US dollar-denominated assets, as well as exploring portfolio diversification. At the same time, the government, confronted with mounting challenges, from trade negotiations with the US to the restructuring of the international economic landscape, should formulate an effective, credible response strategy to restore public trust.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS