US President Donald Trump’s administration is considering rescinding the previous administration’s restrictions on artificial intelligence (AI) chip exports, which were set to take effect on Thursday.
The White House said that sorting countries into three tiers subject to specific AI-related trade regulations is too complex and unenforceable, international media reported. The Trump administration is working toward new regulations to keep advanced AI technology out of the hands of foreign adversaries.
While the exact timetable for the new rules is unknown, the latest development boosted US technology stocks last week, as investors welcomed the US government’s recognition that reasonable regulations are needed to sustain growth and innovation in the tech sector. The move is also likely to have implications for Taiwan’s semiconductor and electronics industries.
Another issue worthy of close attention is the US government’s decision on whether to impose steep tariffs on imported semiconductors, following the closure on Wednesday last week of the comment window for Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act investigation into semiconductor imports.
The Trump administration might announce semiconductor tariffs soon based on the results of the probe, with some suggesting Washington could impose tariffs of between 25 percent and 100 percent on chip imports.
Although US Customs and Border Protection on April 11 included products such as smartphones, PCs, servers, chipmaking equipment and other consumer electronics on a list that would be exempted from the US’ latest round of tariffs, such products would likely be included in the potential semiconductor tariffs, international media reported, citing Trump officials.
In other words, when the US government announces its new semiconductor trade ruling, it might also clarify whether such tech products would retain their exemption status or be reclassified under a different tariff category.
As Trump’s trade policies unfold, the US government’s talks with major trading partners continue to weigh on market sentiment. Taiwan has made progress in trade negotiations with the US, but at the same time, the New Taiwan dollar has continued to fluctuate against the US dollar.
Although the government has strongly denied that the NT dollar’s exchange rates were part of trade negotiations, worries over tariffs and the local currency’s rapid appreciation have dominated headlines across multiple news outlets over the past week.
The push to finalize Trump’s tax reform package and his goal of reducing the US’ trade deficit is beginning to take shape, with the White House rushing to reach trade deals with multiple countries. This would likely spur market speculation over rising exchange rates in counterpart economies — and inevitably the strengthening of the NT dollar.
However, none has been appreciating as much as the NT dollar, which has exhibited more volatility than ever before, putting greater pressure on export-oriented businesses from electronics to semiconductors and traditional industries.
It remains unclear whether the Trump administration’s trade deals could lead to a meaningful reduction in tariffs, but one thing that is certain is that the US president’s aggressive tariff moves have rattled investors’ confidence in the US dollar and cast uncertainty over the appeal of US assets.
Against this backdrop, Taiwanese investors and exporters should think seriously about hedging, if not reducing, their exposure to US dollar-denominated assets, as well as exploring portfolio diversification. At the same time, the government, confronted with mounting challenges, from trade negotiations with the US to the restructuring of the international economic landscape, should formulate an effective, credible response strategy to restore public trust.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS