The Legislative Yuan has passed new legislation adding four national holidays and making Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors.
That would create a confusing national identity for Taiwanese and the government.
Taiwan Retrocession Day and the anniversary of the Battle of Guningtou, and Constitution Day are used by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to indoctrinate Taiwanese, feeding them propaganda to make them think they are Chinese. It is the same case for Teachers’ Day, which marks the ancient Chinese philosopher Confucius’ (孔子) birthday.
The “retrocession of Taiwan” refers to Japan handing over Taiwan proper and Penghu to the Republic of China (ROC) in 1945. To the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party, it is the only legal basis for the “one China” principle in international law.
On Oct. 25, 1945, the Japanese surrender ceremony took place in Taipei. The ROC’s Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) handed Order No. 1 to General Rikichi Ando, Japan’s last governor-general of Taiwan, saying: “Receiving the territory of Taiwan and the Penghu archipelago.”
After Ando signed the document, Chen delivered a speech proclaiming that Taiwan and the Penghu Islands had rejoined China.
That political show was the so-called “retrocession of Taiwan.” That was not valid in international law. A military occupier does not have the right to hand over the sovereignty of an occupied territory. It is a peace treaty that can determine the sovereignty of an occupied territory after a war. It is the principle of international law.
Ando, as a governor and an army commander, did not have the right to hand over the sovereignty of an occupied territory on behalf of his government.
Then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was aware of the invalidity of the “retrocession of Taiwan.” Therefore, on Jan. 12, 1949, he called then-Taiwan provincial governor Chen Cheng (陳誠) to inform him that until the peace treaty was signed, Taiwan was just a territory under the ROC’s trusteeship.
Most of the Allies, including the US, did not recognize that Japan ceded Taiwan to the ROC. Therefore, on Sept. 8, 1951, the Allies and Japan signed the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which states that “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.”
The statement of the “retrocession of Taiwan” is thus untenable. The “one China” principle that rests its legal basis on that statement is also merely political propaganda.
Designating Retrocession Day as a national holiday by passing new legislation would instill the narrative of “one China” in the general public, reshaping national identity. The international community would also be put under the impression that the Taiwanese government and its people accept the “one China” principle, and China would step up its “united front” efforts by saying that “Taiwan’s restoration to China was a victorious outcome of World War II.”
Hideki Nagayama is the chairman of the Taiwan Research Forum.
Translated by Fion Khan
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS