The Legislative Yuan has passed new legislation adding four national holidays and making Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors.
That would create a confusing national identity for Taiwanese and the government.
Taiwan Retrocession Day and the anniversary of the Battle of Guningtou, and Constitution Day are used by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to indoctrinate Taiwanese, feeding them propaganda to make them think they are Chinese. It is the same case for Teachers’ Day, which marks the ancient Chinese philosopher Confucius’ (孔子) birthday.
The “retrocession of Taiwan” refers to Japan handing over Taiwan proper and Penghu to the Republic of China (ROC) in 1945. To the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party, it is the only legal basis for the “one China” principle in international law.
On Oct. 25, 1945, the Japanese surrender ceremony took place in Taipei. The ROC’s Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) handed Order No. 1 to General Rikichi Ando, Japan’s last governor-general of Taiwan, saying: “Receiving the territory of Taiwan and the Penghu archipelago.”
After Ando signed the document, Chen delivered a speech proclaiming that Taiwan and the Penghu Islands had rejoined China.
That political show was the so-called “retrocession of Taiwan.” That was not valid in international law. A military occupier does not have the right to hand over the sovereignty of an occupied territory. It is a peace treaty that can determine the sovereignty of an occupied territory after a war. It is the principle of international law.
Ando, as a governor and an army commander, did not have the right to hand over the sovereignty of an occupied territory on behalf of his government.
Then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was aware of the invalidity of the “retrocession of Taiwan.” Therefore, on Jan. 12, 1949, he called then-Taiwan provincial governor Chen Cheng (陳誠) to inform him that until the peace treaty was signed, Taiwan was just a territory under the ROC’s trusteeship.
Most of the Allies, including the US, did not recognize that Japan ceded Taiwan to the ROC. Therefore, on Sept. 8, 1951, the Allies and Japan signed the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which states that “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.”
The statement of the “retrocession of Taiwan” is thus untenable. The “one China” principle that rests its legal basis on that statement is also merely political propaganda.
Designating Retrocession Day as a national holiday by passing new legislation would instill the narrative of “one China” in the general public, reshaping national identity. The international community would also be put under the impression that the Taiwanese government and its people accept the “one China” principle, and China would step up its “united front” efforts by saying that “Taiwan’s restoration to China was a victorious outcome of World War II.”
Hideki Nagayama is the chairman of the Taiwan Research Forum.
Translated by Fion Khan
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS